Romney's "pro" gun stance isn't believable to me either.
and by "pro" I mean "anti".
CROWLEY: Governor, Governor, if I could, the question was about these assault weapons that once were once banned and are no longer banned.
I know that you signed an assault weapons ban when you were in Massachusetts, obviously, with this question, you no longer do support that. Why is that, given the kind of violence that we see sometimes with these mass killings? Why is it that you have changed your mind?
ROMNEY: Well, Candy, actually, in my state, the pro-gun folks and the anti-gun folks came together and put together a piece of legislation. And it's referred to as an assault weapon ban, but it had, at the signing of the bill, both the pro-gun and the anti-gun people came together, because it provided opportunities for both that both wanted.
There were hunting opportunities, for instance, that haven't previously been available and so forth, so it was a mutually agreed- upon piece of legislation. That's what we need more of, Candy. What we have right now in Washington is a place that's gridlocked.
CROWLEY: So I could -- if you could get people to agree to it, you would be for it?
ROMNEY: We have --
OBAMA: Candy?
ROMNEY: -- we haven't had the leadership in Washington to work on a bipartisan basis. I was able to do that in my state and bring these two together.
Sounds like he doesn't realize what the 2A is about, and wouldn't protect it against a majority of idiots that would do away with it if it was "bipartisan"
I'd rather vote for someone who has a personal Anti preference who does nothing about it...and O has done nothing about it....but will openly admit his opinion and even plans...so that I can counter,
Than someone speaking double-speak, who has actually successfully worked to limit his constituents' 2A rights.
The whole "against it before he was for it" really.....really turns me off. I would rather have a truthful opponent than an untruthful ally.