jimbo555
Member
J.Edgar Hoover carried a 32 Colt revolver if that means anything!
J.Edgar Hoover carried a 32 Colt revolver if that means anything!
Try getting them to explain why you can get equal expansion and greater depth of penetration with a 158 gr. JHP in .357 Magnum, yet the 125 gr. JHP in .357 Magnum with its higher KE is a better stopper.
The 147gr Federal HST expands more and penetrates less than the 124gr +P GDHP. This is just further evidence that bullet construction and momentum are far more critical than energy in terminal ballistics.And for those that don't know, it was Martin Fackler's theories dominated by penetration that led the FBI and other LE agencies to choose the 147 gr. JHP 9mm load in the late 80s. These rounds failed to provide adequate expansion and in some cases innocent bystanders were struck by overpenetrating bullets.
I keep referring to M&S because it's the only data that covers real world gun battles and not just testing theories in ballistic gelatin.
Of course they threw out shootings where more than one shot was fired. How else can you compare one load/caliber directly to another load/caliber.
The 147gr Federal HST expands more and penetrates less than the 124gr +P GDHP. This is just further evidence that bullet construction and momentum are far more critical than energy in terminal ballistics.
We'll leave out that M&S so-called data set is seriously flawed, fails under scientific scrutiny, and was very likely fabricated.
In regard to "QUANTITATIVE AMMUNITION SELECTION" I remember a test done sometime back that showed JHP rounds that did not expand in gelatin would frequently expand in water, which brings into question "how reliable is shooting into water" a good gauge of bullet expansion?Well said.
It is good see that there are others who "get it"... I mean, besides Shawn.
In regard to "QUANTITATIVE AMMUNITION SELECTION" I remember a test done sometime back that showed JHP rounds that did not expand in gelatin would frequently expand in water, which brings into question "how reliable is shooting into water" a good gauge of bullet expansion?
"Through comparative analysis, the dynamic equivalence (in terms of respective density and internal speed of sound) of water and calibrated 10 percent ordnance gelatin as ballistic test mediums will also be established."
"Water can be used as a tissue simulant and causes just slightly more bullet deformation than gelatin or soap; the Firearms Training Unit of the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation uses it as a screening mechanism to decide which bullets expand well enough to merit further scrutiny."
"Because water produces dynamic forces on transient projectiles that are nearly identical to those produced by calibrated ordnance gelatin, it is an excellent tissue simulant. Water is insensitive to ambient environmental conditions, requires no calibration in order to produce valid test results, and can be used with little difficulty. Ballistic tests conducted in calibrated ordnance gelatin require rigorous environmental control to ensure a valid test outcome and can cost in excess of $400 per test shot. The ease of use and low cost of testing in water make it an attractive option for those individuals seeking a valid, cost-effective ballistic test medium."
The 147gr Federal HST expands more and penetrates less than the 124gr +P GDHP. This is just further evidence that bullet construction and momentum are far more critical than energy in terminal ballistics.
We'll leave out that M&S so-called data set is seriously flawed, fails under scientific scrutiny, and was very likely fabricated.
FWIW, the 357 magnum attained its lethal performance reputation long before there were jacketed hollow point bullets on the market. The 158gr round nose lead bullet gave way to to the 158gr semi jacket hollow point during the mid to late 60s as I understand it. The 125gr SJHPs were developed during the mid 70s. I entered LE after returning from Vietnam and the only ammunition we carried was the Remington 158gr SJHPs.
First you complained that 9mm 147gr JHPs overpenetrate and don't expand enough. Now you're complaining about one of the largest expanding 9mm loads of any bullet weight not having enough momentum. What else do you want?In the case you cite, the 124 gr. Gold Dot +P has both higher energy and momentum compared to the 147 gr. HST.
Actually, you're so awe struck with the energy numbers of exterior ballistics that you've been blinded to any rational discussion of terminal ballistics.I'm starting to think that some of you guys haven't been at this very long or haven't developed the skills to accurately shoot the higher energy loads, and in the case of the 165 gr. Golden Saber, it has considerably higher momentum to that of a subsonic 180. I enjoy good mathematical data as much as anyone else and can perform all of it. I just don't awe at it
FWIW, the 357 magnum attained its lethal performance reputation long before there were jacketed hollow point bullets on the market. The 158gr round nose lead bullet...
so awe struck with the energy numbers of exterior ballistics...blinded to any rational discussion of terminal ballistics.
I think that pretty well sums it up for most people. I hear far more arguments for the "best" based on velocity/energy figures than anything else.
To me, it's a little like using the top speed as a basis for the selection of a new pickup truck
You, like M&S, are correlating the incorrect variables. Every year in North America ice cream sales are at their highest in the months of June through July. During those same months, drowning deaths are also at their highest each year. Clearly consumption of ice cream leads to drowning if you ignore that recreational swimming is also at its highest during those months.You're putting incorrect words in your own mouth. Today's 147 gr. JHP in 9mm expands much better than the 147 gr. JHP in 9mm of the late 80s that didn't expand. I've said that if you bothered to read the post in its entirety. But at 326 Ft/Lbs I'm not gonna count on it to work as well on some adrenalin charged criminal as it does in gelatin, are you? As far as I am cocerned any rational discussion of terminal ballistics should at least consider actual gunfight performance in the M&S data and not just on theoretical models or examining perps corpses that where shot multiple times with whatever.
Which simply proves that the majority of the people who voted are uneducated or undereducated on terminal ballistics of handgun rounds.I also think y'all should look at the poll numbers. The overwhelming majority believe that energy in handgun rounds does matter!
I have said it repeatedly now that this is where ballistic gel testing can be useful. M&S also use ballistic gel testing that correlates to their one shot stop data.
And while it may be a crapshoot it's far more telling than energy numbers.Ballistic gelatin...or any other homogenous medium...is mainly useful in comparing the performance of different bullet/cartridge combinations at various ranges.
I'm going to vote no, because I lean towards the "bullets make holes" school of thought so I'm more worried about the average penetration and expansion of any given defensive round than I am about the energy level of the round when comparing bullet A to bullet B.
But, that doesn't mean I discount energy levels entirely. I just don't know how much of a factor they are.
__________________
I'm going to count on it to perform (expand and penetrate) as well as it does in gelatin covered by four layers of heavy denim cloth.But at 326 Ft/Lbs I'm not gonna count on it to work as well on some adrenalin charged criminal as it does in gelatin, are you?
This is a great example of folks not understanding the physics. First, velocity does not equal energy. Second, once a barrier - like a large mammal for example - is encountered it's momentum, not energy, that allows the projectile to penetrate. This is because energy is conserved only in plastic collisions, and not in elastic collisions. That's why momentum is far more important than energy when discussing the terminal ballistics of projectiles in a self defense context.Once expanded, a bullet relies on bullet weight and remaining velocity (energy) to continue penetrating.