I also notice that the Supreme Court has become increasingly reluctant to take on gun cases. Maybe "gun weariness" has set in among the five members of the Court that ruled in the Heller and McDonald cases. Even the Justices are not immune to the pressures of public opinion.
At this point, I'm convinced they accidentally gave us a more favorable ruling than they intended (or rather, the current makeup of the Court feels this way). Not to mention, our side of the issue has so distilled and focused our legal arguments and support (see the "may issue" conflicting circuit court rulings stacked against each other on legal and logical merit, and it is very striking how poorly supported gun law justification is) that any publicly-accountable (by which I mean 'visible') court ruling will be unable to get away with a flagrant miscarriage like DC regarding Mr. Witashek's muzzle loader bullets.
That any SCOTUS case regarding the RKBA would be a foregone conclusion, is actually something of a reason for the courts to resist ruling on it there (and instead let lower courts like the 9th do the job like they are supposed to). The anti's and anti-judges won't force the issue of their restrictions for fear it would be appealed further up and get a less favorable ruling (see again the 9th's ruling on "may issue"
not be appealed to SCOTUS)
Obama calling for more control
Let him. I don't think he could successfully call a cab at this point. We're done listening, let alone "negotiating."
The answer is not exactly unknown
Knowing crime is commited by black people (which I assume is the thrust of the data) isn't exactly a
helpful piece of information, even if it is
interesting. We all know our system cannot be made to work legally along racial lines, so going down that road is pointless and fundamentally unconstitutional. When you look at why that particular demographic exhibits such unique criminal representation, you see a whole host of destabilizing factors that insist upon and amplify each other, resulting in an extraordinarily tough nut to crack as far as finding/implementing a 'cure' if there even is one.
I was watching Bill Maher at the gym before, "it was on" and he thanked them for dong more for gun control than Obama could.
Something tells me that's more of a dig at Obama's ineffectiveness on this issue than a denigration of those rude fools. Even so, look at what the alleged 'bans' in the restaurants actually do vs. the previous arrangement and you'll see the change is laughably insignificant (oh no, they banned them; and the only reason they weren't banned before was because no one had opened carried ever. We didn't carry open there before, and now we can't, and even if we could by law, we wouldn't out of politeness; such an enormous loss
). They got a behavior that wasn't, isn't, and won't ever be socially acceptable banned; big freakin' surprise, and bigger whoop.
TCB