High-end .22LR rifles

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have a couple Rem. 541-S', but I just couldn't stand that gaudy plastic finish on their cheap looking plastic for end capped stock, so I put mine in a decent hunting stock,

View attachment 773658

I wanted it for "go" not "show" lol, and it's VERY accurate, I've shot a lot of small game and pest with my 541...

DM
Is that a Rem 581 LH stock?

Years ago, I saw a 541S in a factory birdseye maple stock and it was georgous! Didn't have the money to spare, but I'd have bought it today.
 
It is a factory stock, but has much more color and contrast that any other Chipmunk I've seen. Which is reason I bought it, as I can't resist pretty wood.
Beautiful wood for sure. I have the same affliction--I can't pass up a pretty stock.
 
Last edited:
I bought a chipmunk rifle new for my 6 year old son 25 years ago. My father had been chief engineer for 40 years of gun design, he pounded on table tops and yelled at 150 engineers and draftsmen. My father yelled at me for buying a gun designed by amateurs with a firing pin galling in the bolt body. My wife, a software engineering manager and no stranger to bossing people around, grabbed the Chipmunk and took it back to the store.
My son, now a software engineer at Google, owns no guns, but one of his sons may legally inherit my guns .. if I can live another 17 years, like this 1934 Winchester 52 with G.Titherington barrel, Wright-Allen trigger, and Weitek Vaver rear sight.View attachment 774171
Nice 52! The star on the cheek piece is quite interesting.
 
Is that a Rem 581 LH stock?
Years ago, I saw a 541S in a factory birdseye maple stock and it was georgous! Didn't have the money to spare, but I'd have bought it today.
Yes it is, I much prefer it to the butt ugly shocks that came on the 541-s rifles...

I have several of the 500 series Rem. 22's...

DM
 
I don't know if this rifle really qualifies to be here so if it is not appropriate for this thread let me know and I will remove it.
It is a Kimber 82G that I refinished. I don't have the scope on it anymore; I went back to the aperture sights and use it for small bore prone matches.
i8qsjqz.jpg
CyEO3Ap.jpg
 
I don't know if this rifle really qualifies to be here so if it is not appropriate for this thread let me know and I will remove it.
It is a Kimber 82G that I refinished. I don't have the scope on it anymore; I went back to the aperture sights and use it for small bore prone matches.
View attachment 774298
View attachment 774299
DavidABQ, nothing at all wrong with an 82G. It looks like a fine rifle, and here it belongs. Thanks for posting it!
 
Our 82G on the range. Trigger job by Nemo on RFC, about 6oz break. Harrell tuner. New striker spring, lots of work on finding the right action torque (Kimber 82's are very sensitive to action torque I have found). Problem was, my wife was outshooting the rifle, so we got her the Myers action.

IMG_20121006_081323sm.jpg
 
tuj, my better half has yet to out-shoot me, but only because I'm careful about which rifles I'll let her shoot!;)
 
Here's something I thought some of you might like to see. There are any number of single-shot Anschutz match rifles floating around, but if you want to use one in something like PRS rimfire or small-bore silhouette competition, you might be at a disadvantage with a single shot. Gunsmith Mark Chesebro, of Chesebro Rifles, has developed a process for converting single-shot Anschutz rifles to magazine-fed repeaters, using a mildly modified CZ-452/455 magazine. Chesebro modifies the receiver as necessary, then installs his shop-made aluminum mag well, ready for the slightly altered CZ mag. This is the barreled action of my 54 match rifle (pictured in the first post of this thread) converted to a magazine-fed repeater. You can see the notch cut in the back of the CZ mag for Chesebro's mag release lever in the second pic.
SANY1576.JPG SANY1581.JPG
 
Here's something I thought some of you might like to see. There are any number of single-shot Anschutz match rifles floating around, but if you want to use one in something like PRS rimfire or small-bore silhouette competition, you might be at a disadvantage with a single shot.

I was always told that the single-shot actions were the best for accuracy because they are stronger/stiffer than a repeater with its magazine well. Is this modification for the 54 or 64 series rifles? Very interesting.. I suppose if one really wanted an Anschutz repeater, they do have a Fortner bolt model made for biathlon. I personally can't afford an Anschutz biathlon rifle, but I could afford the Russian gun; the Izhmash 7-2.

When I got into position shooting, I also went with the Russian counterpart, the CM-2. It's very accurate (not as much as the bench guns, but still very good at 50 yards), but where it really shines is the trigger. It's a nice two-stage with a clean and fairly light break, but still stiff enough that you aren't going to accidentally bump it and fire like the Jewell triggers.

IMG_20140401_152219sm.jpg
 
I've heard the same about single shot actions being more accurate, but the goal here--as I understand it--is to take a single shot rifle and make it competitive in shooting disciplines that favor magazine-fed repeaters. (BTW, I didn't have this one built--I bought it this way.) The Chesebro conversion is for the match 54 action only.
 
I suppose if one really wanted an Anschutz repeater, they do have a Fortner bolt model made for biathlon. I personally can't afford an Anschutz biathlon rifle, but I could afford the Russian gun; the Izhmash 7-2.

When I got into position shooting, I also went with the Russian counterpart, the CM-2. It's very accurate (not as much as the bench guns, but still very good at 50 yards), but where it really shines is the trigger. It's a nice two-stage with a clean and fairly light break, but still stiff enough that you aren't going to accidentally bump it and fire like the Jewell triggers.

View attachment 774338
Thinking this over, you make a great point here. Anschutz does not make a match grade repeater, except for the Fortner-actioned Biathlon series. Their target guns are all single shot. Some of their sporters are quite accurate, but they don't come with Anschutz's best match triggers. The vaunted 54 MSR mated a repeating action with the wonderful 5018 trigger, but these are hard to find and expensive when you do find them. Now, take the 14xx series single shot target rifles. They come with a heavy match barrel, and many come with the superb U9 trigger, adjustable from 5.5 ounces down to 2 ounces. Take one of these, have Chesebro do the conversion to it, and you have a repeating rifle with a great barrel and a splendid target trigger (this is just what the previous owner of my rifle had done). It is not a cheap solution by any stretch, but it is still cheaper than the Anschutz Fortner-actioned guns.

Anyway, post up some pics of those Russian guns. This thread needs a little more life!
 
  • Like
Reactions: tuj
I've only got one photo of the 7-2, although it's a ton of fun to shoot. You can cycle almost as fast as a 10/22 once you get the hang of the bolt. It's pretty slick. To scope it, I got an cantilevered AR scope mount and put it on backwards to get the right eye relief.

Izhmash_7-2.png
 
I've only got one photo of the 7-2, although it's a ton of fun to shoot. You can cycle almost as fast as a 10/22 once you get the hang of the bolt. It's pretty slick. To scope it, I got an cantilevered AR scope mount and put it on backwards to get the right eye relief.

View attachment 774409
Very interesting rifle, but one I know nothing about. I assume it has some sort of toggle bolt action? Does it shoot as good as the CM-2?
 
Yes, the 7-2 (there is also a 7-3 and 7-4) is nice. The 7-4 is an actual biathlon rifle with biathlon stock that holds your magazines, adjustable cheek riser, etc. There was a group in Canada that was importing them for their athletes. All of the 7-X rifles have a deeply recessed target crown and use a toggle-bolt action. For the 7-2 I have 5 and 10-shot magazines. The 7-3 and 7-4 of course have the diopter-style open sights while the 7-2 just has a small rail on the receiver. Which is perfectly fine by me, because my eyes struggle to shoot diopter-style irons.

The 7-2 trigger is very nice for casual shooting. It is not particularly heavy, but it is a two-stage design and feels very natural to shoot. The 7-2 rifle is the one I'll pick up if I'm bringing someone new to the range and I want them to have fun shooting steel. The trigger on the CM-2 is more refined, lighter and more crisp. As far as accuracy, I have never really tested the 7-2 on paper, but from shooting steel at 50-100 yards, if you miss it's your fault, not the gun's. I did some paper target-work with the CM-2 and it shot very well. Not as good as some of the amazing groups in this thread, but very consistent 5-shot groups from the bench.
 
Yes, the 7-2 (there is also a 7-3 and 7-4) is nice. The 7-4 is an actual biathlon rifle with biathlon stock that holds your magazines, adjustable cheek riser, etc. There was a group in Canada that was importing them for their athletes.
Thanks for the info. I sometimes lurk on a Canadian gun forum, and the Russian rifles are very popular there. Apparently the laws regarding importation from communist countries are a bit different there.
 
DavidABQ, nothing at all wrong with an 82G. It looks like a fine rifle, and here it belongs. Thanks for posting it!
Thank you. The 82G was not an expensive rifle but it shoots well and after refinishing the stock is looks much nicer than the OEM finish they put on it at the factory. Almost as much fun to shoot as my Anschutz 1712.
 
A truly high-end .22 rifle--not mine, of course, for I can't afford a $25,000 rifle--for your enjoyment. Metal work by Jack Belk, stocked by Maurice Ottmar, engraved by Eric Gold, this incredible custom Springfield .22 was built in 1993 for the American Custom Gunmakers Guild's rifle raffle No.9.
acgg-22-left.jpg
acgg-22-right.jpg
acgg-22-midover.jpg
acgg-22-cased.jpg
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top