Seems like everyone likes their Revolution, and I like mine as well-for the most part.
I have a Redfield Revolution 4-12x32 on an older Savage (pre accu trigger) in 243. It gets the job done but it has some weaknesses.
Pros:
Clear in most lighting conditions you're apt to hunt in. Repeatable crosshair adjustment. (I can basically drawn a square with my rifle at 100 yrds by adjusting the the windage and elevation, and it always comes back to zero.) Durable and waterproof. I haven't drop tested it yet, but I have used it in light rain.
Cons:
The BDC reticle is inaccurate to the point of being useless. I have the reticle with the circle around the cross hair and the dot half way down the vertical hair. You're supposed to zero at 200 yrds and use the bottom of the circle as your 300 yard hold and the dot is supposed to be your 500 yrd hold. It doesn't work out that way. The dot is closer to the 300 yrd hold. I generally just aim high and let 'er rip, as I would do with traditional crosshairs. This has been the case for basic cup and core factory (both Winchester Powerpoint and Remington core-lokt), factory copper solids (Barnes TSX and TTSX as well as Federal with the Barnes bullet) and my own TSX handloads.
I wish the tube was longer to have more adjustment front to back on the rifle. y rifle is an old school long action gun, and my scope rings are up agains the objective lens bell and the eyepiece bell. It is not optimal for my eye relief, but it works.
Other than that, it has been a good scope. I may eventually replace it with a Vortext, but not in the next few years.
The Redfield products were always a budget scope, but they the better of the budget scopes. Far ahead of the crap Tasco and Bushnell are turning out for not much more money. I also have a pair of Redfield Rebel 10x42 field glasses, and they give good service as well, although, they'll be the next optic I replace.