TrapperReady
Member
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2003
- Messages
- 2,732
learning first hand about it
That would mean that you've actually hunted. Reading about it is second-hand at best.
learning first hand about it
palerider1 said:Red Wind,
You contradict yourself my friend. you start out by saying
"After speaking with a hunter myself, and reviewing the facts, I can't deny that hunting is nothing short of wrong, and perpetuates the very problems it claims to solve!"
then you say in the same paragraph
"Please note that I am not against hunting,"
which is it buddy? are you not against something you feel is wrong? Go play somewhere else!!!!! I hunt and i always eat what i kill. I also go to the store and buy food which i eat. I believe that wastfullness is wrong, especially when a hunter is not a good enough shot to get a clean kill. there have been plenty of times when i have not taken that shotbecause i know i cant make a clean kill. There are some idiots that call themselves hunters. they will shoot at bushes that move thinking there is a deer in there. those are the people that kill other hunters. Responsible hunting is not only good, but it feeds some families, along with creating many long life friendships.
i think your barking up the wrong tree coming here and making your statements. if your going to try to make a point, please at least dont contradict yourself. I wont argue with an idiot..not trying to be rude, but take a look at what you wrote my friend.
palerider1 said:I think you are confused...........You have probably never shot a gun, or have even been hunting. please go away. did you read my post as to how you contradict yourself..............go away and come back after you have all of your facts straight. get your facts from the conservation department in your state instead of bleeding heart websites. you dont know what your talking about.
Irrelevant. Your starting premise was that hunting is evil, that it is wrong. Necessity has nothing to do with whether a thing is right or wrong.is hunting necessary?
Red_Wind said:Mostly I find it interesting that everyone thinks that I am so biased. . .then why am I here on a hunting site?
Red_Wind said::banghead: I am a bit disappointed that there are so many people convinced they are doing the right thing by going into the woods and shooting animals for pleasure or sport. After speaking with a hunter myself, and reviewing the facts, I can't deny that hunting is nothing short of wrong, and perpetuates the very problems it claims to solve!
Ok, THOSE are your own words. Unfortunately they have absolutely NOTHING to do with the debate you said you desired. So far virtually everything you have said ON TOPIC has been simply cut and pasted from other websites--NOT your own words.um now I am not using my own words? I apoligize if my writing skills far surpass your own. . .I can't help that I am at a college reading level *shrugs
Red_Wind said:Is hunting necessary? YES OR NO
palerider1 said:sorry to all the other THR members for my posts,,,,,it just aggrevates the piss out of me when you try to reason with a person like this. i apologize to all those (except the red one) for my negative posts. i'm done with this subject because one cannot reason or discuss anything with a person who just talks, thinking they know everything, but knows nothing, but never listens............... this college student is in for a rude awakening when he/she gets into the real world.....wish i was there to see it
trueblue1776 said:Yes, I have eaten dove when I had no $$ but a $2 box of 12ga shells.
So that week, yes it was necessary