Federal Cartridge under legal fire

Status
Not open for further replies.
Correct me if I am wrong, but wouldn't a properly placed shot in the major bone sections like a shoulder etc drop him like a rock? Otherwise it would pass through like a light saber. It takes a lot a cajones to sue for stupidity. :banghead:
 
In South Africa, we had a name for hunters like this - we called them "kitty food"... :D

Seriously, there are all too many documented cases of lions being hit up to ten times by major-caliber rounds, that performed exactly as their manufacturers intended, and still taking several pounds of hamburger off some hunter's favorite posterior. They are really tough animals, and in a charge situation, with adrenaline flowing and the normal agressive instincts of the lion in hyperdrive, you're going to have to take out the brain or spine, or some major bone structure, to stop him reaching you. Once he's reached you, he's likely to die chewing on your favorite body.

There have been all too many professional hunters killed by lion, who did everything right, shot the lion repeatedly with hits that ultimately proved fatal, but still got chomped because the lion didn't know he was dead. That's what dangerous game hunting is all about, although this idiot doesn't seem to have realized it... And, by the way, a .458 is NOT a superior lion round, particularly in a deep-penetrating round like that described here. It won't have enough expansion to make a bigger hole and break bone and blood vessels as well as will a softer-point, better-expanding round. It's also a case of overkill, in that it will probably penetrate right through the critter and expend most of its energy on African dirt on the other side. Rather choose a bullet that will stay in the body and expend all those foot-pounds of energy where they'll do the most good (or harm, depending on your point of view!).
 
To those who say it isn't the lawyers fault. Wrong, now the question is how many did Mr. idiot lion hunter talk to before one took the suit?
 
Sounds to me like the ammo performed exactly as it should. It fired, it penetrated through and through. May have expanded, may not. Who knows? If it didn't, thin-skinned game on that bullet is a pretty good excuse...

I would have a real hard time finding for the plaintiff.
 
Gees, I was fishing with South Bend hooks last summer and didn't catch any fish; maybe I should sue the manufacturer. Or maybe it was the Shimano reel, excellent, two deep-pockets. Then again, maybe it was the boat, so I'll sue Lund, too.

These kinds of suits are so ridiculous they make me sick. And I'm a lawyer.
 
Scotsman goes to Africa to whack a lion.

Then comes to California, of all places for a lawyer! Supplies!! :D
 
What an idiot. Everyone knows that the best way to stop a charging lion is..............................





















TAKE AWAY HIS CREDIT CARDS!!!:D
 
I hate to say this about a fellow hunter, but it's a shame the lion didn't win this time.

Wonder what it will take to get tort reform?
 
Never hunted a cat that big before, but I would suspect a 12 gauge 3" slugs from a semi auto or pump would have done a better job.
 
Tort reform in the form of strict punitive damage caps is not needed. There are good reasons for allowing high punitive damage awards in _valid_ lawsuits. The problem is idiotic lawsuits that end up with juries who think Rosie, Oprah, etc. are moral demigods.
 
Wonder what it will take to get tort reform?
Common sense on the part of juries, since they are the ones who make the big awards, and on the part of voters, who elect the politicians who write the laws that lawyers use to advocate for their clients.

Oh, and the shakespeare quote? read the rest of the play, turns out the villains made the anti-lawyer comment as the first part of their plan to remove obstacles to lawlessness and oppression. That said, keep in mind even the worst law student to graduate is still a lawyer . . .
 
It was my understanding that a person hunting dangerous game usually has a guide who is also armed to back him up?

Lack of preparation.

This lawsuit is a complete joke. What part of "dangerous game" does this guy not understand? He took a chance. He got mauled. Cry me a river. Maybe he should switch to hunting ducks or pheasants.
 
Scotsman goes to Africa to whack a lion.
Actually, its Scottish professional hunter/guide gets chewed on by lion. Here is his photograph and website.
rolf2.jpg


In the main page of his website, is a picture of the African continent, with a lion in the middle. I wonder if thats the lion that chewed on him. :D
 
I think he should be suing his sneaker manufacturer... 'cause dang skippy he wasn't running fast enough!
 
They could test the bullets in court to see how well they work.

My suggestion:

Line up the plaintiff and his lawyers front to back, Fire one shot and see how far it penetrates, If the plaintiff and lawyers fall over dead, Bullet works as designed, case dismissed with prejudice.

If they survive, repeat.

Justice served.

Judge MasterBlaster has spoken.

:rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top