Simple question. What information (mis-information) source do you feel has taught you more?
I starting reading gun mags before the internet even existed but I feel that I have learned more in the past 5 years on various gun forums that in all the years I spent reading gun mags.
On the net, you can ask a spcific question and get an answer. Gun mags just tell you what they want to, you have no input.
On the net, you can get 20-30 responses so you don't have to take just one person's word for something.
On the net, you cross check any info to see if it is legit by looking it up. In the days before the net, all we had were books and more gun mags.
On the net, nobody is paid to tell you which product to buy. There is still plenty of bias but it is not paid bias.
I starting reading gun mags before the internet even existed but I feel that I have learned more in the past 5 years on various gun forums that in all the years I spent reading gun mags.
On the net, you can ask a spcific question and get an answer. Gun mags just tell you what they want to, you have no input.
On the net, you can get 20-30 responses so you don't have to take just one person's word for something.
On the net, you cross check any info to see if it is legit by looking it up. In the days before the net, all we had were books and more gun mags.
On the net, nobody is paid to tell you which product to buy. There is still plenty of bias but it is not paid bias.