I don't care what firearm one has. Glock, AK, Thompson/Center Contender-Encore. They can, and will fail.
If I want the odds at 99% I will carry a quality built, and maintained revolver.
I am happy for the OP. He got what he wanted. It will probably work just fine.I'm surprised at the amount of negative reactions here. Guy buys a gun he wants, pays a price he's happy with, and gets a particular type of finish he prefers. What's going on in your lives that you're able to find downside in this?
No, it means "Fail. Zero useability". But the period and the last word failed... erh, fell off.I am happy for the OP. He got what he wanted. It will probably work just fine.
What ticks me off, is the wording of the product name for the coating. It implies, that his brand new Glock can not fail.
I guess that is what my rant is about.
If I offend anyone. Sorry.
What ticks me off, is the wording of the product name for the coating. It implies, that his brand new Glock can not fail.
You've piqued my interest. What is the risk involved from a finish failure?DBR wrote,
INMHO unless a plated finish provides a proven, reliable benefit it is not worth the risk.
As someone familiar with coatings like "Failzero", I prefer the factory Glock metal finish. The factory finish is very corrosion/wear resistant and holds lube well. I tested and sold the Failzero AR15 bolt and carrier I bought. It required lube and didn't hold it nearly as well as the milspec phosphate finish
Does Glock put the failzero over their normal metal finish? The reason i don't care for it on a Glock is because the normal finish is excellent.