JustinJ
Member
justinj, my last post is to the OP. i never said its a traditional akm variant (read my last post carefuly)
I misread. My mistake.
ok justinJ, then convince me why i should buy an arsenal/saiga over the m10? keep in mind off the shelf as it comes and price range, from the dealer. and really dont care if its made in russia...PLEASE, as for short sight radius....not again, i have a couple of pistols with short sight radius and have no problems shooting with them. i have no problems shooting my m10 also, heck i got an akm variant with a 6" sight radius and still hittin at what i aim at.
A better question is why pay more for an m10 than any other wasr. In regards to why Arsenal, first reason is quality. I've handled the m10 and saw nothing to impress me over other Romanian AKs. I see nothing more than a Romanian with short sight radius and excessively heavy quad rail. I'm not saying they are junk but from a quality perspective the Russian and Bulgarian guns have them beat, hands down. Yes, the romanians are far cheaper so each must decide if they are willing to pay for higher quality. Just don't tell me the m10 offers more. Arsenals can also be had with side folding stocks which are far more comfortable and a much better quad rail. Not to mention proper magwell dimples. The fixed stock m10s come with Tapco stocks. Nuff said about that.
Also, you said they are accurate. Compared to what? Are you implying they have greater accuracy than any other AKM variant?
There is no question that a longer sight radius improves practical accuracy. Some guns give up the sight radius for reduced over all length. My issue with the m10's reduced radius is that it gives it up for what? Cool looks? Yeah, AK47s aren't terribly accurate to begin with by why hinder it further?
You may not see the value in a gun made by Izhmash, the maker of Russian military AKs, but many of us do which is obvious by their retained value.
Again, i'm not trying to trash the m10 and i'm glad you like yours but IMO Arsenal makes a superior gun.