Funny how this always boils down to a big fan club of open tip expanding bullets, vs something military.
I don't have kids and in my HD "plan" in the onset my wife goes into our bedroom closet/armory and I go through the house with the AR. SO with that said and some personal exp I use good ol green tip m855........ lately TAP has been getting my favor but I can't afford to shoot it as much as I shoot monthly so I just stick with the green tip. Please keep in mind firing an AR in the house without ear pro is pretty horrible in it own I threw up afterwards.
Please do not kill any trees.
A lightweight carbine is the first firearm I'd grab if it came down to it. Right now it's loaded with M193 but I'm open to other rounds. It's just what I know
For those who are using M855 (Green Tip) , I'd probably switch to something else. In Iraq , it was revealed pretty quickly that M855 doesn't really work well when shooting at someone who isn't wearing any body armor. In some cases, it took over 5 rounds to bring one of them down. Most of the insurgents were high on speed, PCP and Cocaine and it would sometimes take a head shot to stop them.
After switching to M193, it proved to be a much more effective round against drug crazed individuals not wearing body armor. The same kind of individual you're likely to encounter in a home defense situation.
“In 1980, I treated a soldier shot accidentally with an M16 M193 bullet from a distance of about ten feet. The bullet entered his left thigh and traveled obliquely upward. It exited after passing through about 11 inches of muscle. The man walked in to my clinic with no limp whatsoever: the entrance and exit holes were about 4 mm across, and punctate. X-ray films showed intact bones, no bullet fragments, and no evidence of significant tissue disruption caused by the bullet’s temporary cavity. The bullet path passed well lateral to the femoral vessels. He was back on duty in a few days. Devastating? Hardly. The wound profile of the M193 bullet (page 29 of the Emergency War Surgery—NATO Handbook, GPO, Washington, D.C., 1988) shows that most often the bullet travels about five inches through flesh before beginning significant yaw. But about 15% of the time, it travels much farther than that before yawing—in which case it causes even milder wounds, if it missed bones, guts, lung, and major blood vessels. In my experience and research, at least as many M16 users in Vietnam concluded that it produced unacceptably minimal, rather than “massive”, wounds. After viewing the wound profile, recall that the Vietnamese were small people, and generally very slim. Many M16 bullets passed through their torsos traveling mostly point forward, and caused minimal damage. Most shots piercing an extremity, even in the heavier-built Americans, unless they hit bone, caused no more damage than a 22 caliber rimfire bullet.”
Fackler, ML: “Literature Review”. Wound Ballistics Review; 5(2):40, Fall 2001
That's why they have 30rd mags.quoted from a post by DocGKR from another site
That's why they have 30rd mags.
quoted from a post by DocGKR from another site.
i will use a better defense round
So a hollow point or open tip is about all you need? I figured it would take some sort of frangible or ballistic tip.
regarding m193, it is fine, but you should read the links on page one. There are a lot of people doing gel tests. The M193 does fine, but there are a lot better bullets for home def and duty.
The MK262, MK318, BH 50gr TSX, Honrady 75gr TAP and many quality 62-64gr soft points all perform much better in gel. There is a reason why many departments and agencies are going to these types of ammo.
I personally like the idea of a heavy OTM. It penetrates cloathing well, less penetration of walls, much more energy, much better cavity and it cavitates much quicker.