Would you make this trade?

Status
Not open for further replies.

aHFo3

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2008
Messages
560
Location
Redmond, OR
I have been looking for a Pre-Safety Marlin 1895 45/70. I would use it for various purposes from plinking to hunting.

I have the opportunity to trade my like new (only a turn line) Ruger Bisley Super Blackhawk hunter 44 magnum for a Marlin 1895 from 1974 that is unmodified, 95% condition.

I already have a S&W 29-2 and a lever to go with it, so I won't be without a 44.

After buying the Bisley Hunter, I wished I had picked a standard, blued Bisley instead. Eventually I'll get one of those - especially since I have some Grashorn Stags that will need a revolver to beautify.

Is this a good trade? Am I missing anything?

Thanks!
 
I would do it. I have a 29-5 and a complimentary rifle and been looking for an older Marlin 45-70 so naturally I would say do it! :)

Ron
 
If you already don't like the bisley parsay, and your already looking to replace it in the future..... why not trade?
 
The real Marlin is gone. You have to ask this question?:)

Better know how to reload. That's where this caliber shines.
 
IMHO, the Ruger is worth more. I'd rather have a later Marlin with Ballard rifling for use with cast bullets, safety or not.
 
Given what you've said, especially about regretting the Bisley Hunter and replacing it eventually... I'd do the trade.
 
The Ruger is still in production and the quality is being upheld. The older Marlins were much better quality than the current production. Yes, I would trade.
 
Thanks for the input everyone. CraigC, thanks for bringing up the cast bullet blindspot that I had overlooked. I haven't experienced leading with my microgroove 1894C. It seems as though proper sizing of the cast bullet is crucial in the microgoove barrels.

I won't be making the trade until after Aug 12. We live 3 hours apart. The other guy and I have a gentleman's agreement to be patient until then.

I'll post pics when I get it.

Thanks again!
 
I think that Ruger Bisley's are ugly as hell. I have a Remlin 45-70 that is one fine rifle.
I would jump on that trade like a chicken on a June bug!
 
If this is a 1974 model it should be a bit different from modern guns. The 1895 was discontinued years ago and a modern version came back in 1972 or 1973 I think. These had 22" barrels, straight grips, no recoil pad, but a curved butt plate, and the front sight was in a dovetail cut directly in the barrel instead of on a ramp. I'm not sure exactly when they changed to the pistol grip, but I'd certainly go for one like I described.

Like this one:


http://i797.photobucket.com/albums/yy255/nightravin13/Gun Album/Gun001.jpg


They are the best looking in my opinion. I've had 2 over the years, bought the first in about 1975 and owned at least 1 from then up until aout a year ago when I sold my last one.
 
The trade won't take place until mid-August, but if the other guy keeps his word, it will happen.

It is the 22" barrel, straight grip, curve butt, dovetailed front sight model.
 
Is it sacrilegious to want to make it into a pre-safety guide gun?

I already have my grandpas modified Winchester 1886 45/70 with a 25" barrel, so I was thinking an 18" marlin would be fun. I just hate the safeties.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top