Crazy Fingers
member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2008
- Messages
- 243
Are you kidding? Cheap and poorly made?
Guy, how long have you been around guns to make a crazy statement like that?
Geez...
I think the appropriate question is "how long have you been around guns?". Look at the quality of rifle you can get for $600. Nice machined parts, good fit and finish, even decent walnut stocks. That is something that requires skill to make -- decent metallurgy, decent machining (you actually have to create rifling, instead of a TUBE), a person finishing the stocks that has some semblance of a craftsman, among many other facets to building a quality rifle.
You can try to say all you want that the Saiga-12 is some kind of quality piece of workmanship, but you are wrong. It is a cheap, stamped modified AK receiver, full of cheap, stamped parts, with a metal tube stuck on it, and a plastic stock. It all fits together about as tight as a Jesse Jackson's mouth. It was made in the same factory that stamps cheap mass produced stuff for conscripted peasant armies. It's just cheap Russian stuff! That's why Saiga AKs are less than $400.
Don't interpret this as me saying that the Saiga-12 is not worthy of being owned; quite the opposite. I would really love to have one. I think they're a great platform for social situations. In truth, I have been looking for one for awhile.
But there is NO WAY in the world that it is worth $600. The materials are not there, the labor is not there, and it only that expensive from FEAR.