I agree and yes, Starline .45 ACP does have less case volume in their .45 ACP brass the reasoning is the .45 ACP +P brass comes in about 17 grains heavier resulting in less case volume. Actually about 2 grains less case water volume. The reason being that .45 ACP ammunition can be fired in a partially unsupported chamber. This is not the case in a revolver. A typical .38 special case has a case wall thickness of about 0.010" measuring a piece of Starline and Winchester brass side by side and I don't know of any manufacturers who specifically make .38 Special +P brass ant thicker than their standard brass I can't see where even if I double the case wall thickness the volume will change much looking at the .45 ACP example. Also, SAAMI Voluntary Industry Performance Standards for Pressure and Velocity of Centerfire Pistol and Revolver Ammunition for the Use of Commercial Manufacturers is not a binding standard like for example CIP (Europe's equivalent of SAAMI) which has legal authority. There is no +P, there is one pressure for .38 Special and across the pond they cannot manufacture what we call +P. The .38 Special CIP standard is 150 MPa, 21,756 psi. That is it. Anyway adding 17 grains of weight to a .45 ACP case only yields 2 grains of actual water capacity. while a good idea in a .45 ACP it makes no sense in a revolver cartridge.The SAAMI specs are for the outside dimensions of the case. Since the subject is about case volume, what matters is the internal volume. Manufacturers can do as they please with case volume.
You could also make the same argument for other rounds that have a +P designation - that their SAAMI external dimensions are the same, so the standard and +P must be the same inside. But, as noted, manufacturers can do as they please with case volume. And Starline does, Their 45 ACP +P has less case volume than their regular 45 ACP.
Illegal Possession of Hollow Nose or Hollow Point Bullets in New Jersey
Nothing surprises me anymore with states like NY, NJ CA and several other states. Actually I have heard but not researched that other states have similar laws. But note in NJ law who may carry HP bullet ammunition. Go figure huh?
Ron
When I entered LE in the late 70s, .38Spl +P rounds were out standard issue.Looking back when was the first mention of +P or even +P+? I want to say maybe early 90s?
The permanent wound cavity is no larger than the bullet.These are supposed to do as much damage as a hollow point.
in NJ or anywhere?The permanent wound cavity is no larger than the bullet.
I would not carry them. A prosecutor or plaintiff could have a field day with them. All downside, no upside.
Well that thread is closed so I will put it here. Someone has tried loading a 38 Special cartridge to .357 Magnum pressure:
Bullets are also used in incidents that are not lawfully justified. The finders of fact will with all of the evidence--all that did not disappear and that can be verified. Jury simulations show that mean-looking weapons can influence juries negatively--they go to state of mind.I can't stand these prosecutors. The whole idea of a bullet is to prevent someone killing or maiming me and I am supposed to pussyfoot my defending myself?
Gel tests show a wide temporary wound channel. That's not what one wants.They claim a big wound cavity.
I've replicated .38 SPl. black powder rounds using soft swaged 158gr LRN and a compressed load of FFF pyrodex. These were smoky and uneventful. Were in the upper 600fps out of a 4" gun.
These must be pretty tightly compressed with absolutely no airspace. Loaded up 12 of these, fired them. Cleaned the revolver for a solid hour afterwards.....and never had the urge to do so again.
While I have thought about it I have never loaded .38 Special with black powder but I bet the smoke effect would be pretty cool. The time spent cleaning not so much.
Don't quote me on this because it's been such a long time since ive heard the information, but re-enacters and cowboy action shooters use modern smokeless powder....and sometimes add a little something to the load to make it very smoky, corn starch or something like that....to simulate black powder loads. Using a powder like Unique with a lubed lead bullet is plenty smoky enough for me!
When I entered LE in the late 70s, .38Spl +P rounds were out standard issue.
Believe the Treasury Load was the first +P+ factory offering and was restricted for LE use only. The California Highway Patrol adopted the Treasury load (100gr JHP +P+) for their first issued revolver, the S&W M68
Oops, finger slipped to the 0 too fast…yes, it was a 110 JHPIt's my understanding that the Treasury Load was 110 grains.
Nine forties are great, but they are also out of production. Wish Smith would make another run of them...but they are surprisingly rappy to shoot. They do use moon clips, which makes a great speed load.Nice, found a picture. Like it! No lock!
View attachment 1064359
Hey Driftwood...where did you get your powder dipper? Presume you measure by volume. I made one of a .45 ACP case with a screw handle, but yours looks far more elegant.
Moon
They went shopping for a new cartridge, and a new gun, but not a revolver. While the new cartridge and gun were in the works (what would become the Colt 1911 and the .45ACP) they went back to their old SAA revolvers. There's some debate about whether or not the .45 Colt was actually more effective against the Moros than the .38 Long Colt--I've seen some sources that said nothing but 12Ga shotguns stopped them authoritatively.During the Philippine Insurrection that started in 1899, the 38 Long Colt proved ineffective at stopping Moro warriors who, it is said had wrapped them selves with vines to protect them from bullets. So the military went shopping for a new revolver that was more powerful than the 38 Long Colt revolvers it was currently issuing.
Sorry if this has caused this thread to drift.
They went shopping for a new cartridge, and a new gun, but not a revolver. While the new cartridge and gun were in the works (what would become the Colt 1911 and the .45ACP) they went back to their old SAA revolvers. There's some debate about whether or not the .45 Colt was actually more effective against the Moros than the .38 Long Colt--I've seen some sources that said nothing but 12Ga shotguns stopped them authoritatively.
It definitely has more impressive ballistics. The problem is that reports said even the Krag rifles, certainly far more powerful than any pistol of the time, came up wanting against the Moro attacks.And yes, a 45 Colt loaded with about 40 grains of Black Powder and a 250 grain bullet would have been much more effective against anything than a 38 Long Colt loaded with 18 grains of Black Powder and a 150 grain bullet.
I could not find that cutaway cartridge image when I started this thread, but just stumbled across it so figure I will post it. It may not be accurate but it is what got me started on this in the first place. So here it is, but I would think something is filling the gap because I would think it is not good for the powder to be loose inside the case.
View attachment 1066072
They went shopping for a new cartridge, and a new gun, but not a revolver. While the new cartridge and gun were in the works (what would become the Colt 1911 and the .45ACP) they went back to their old SAA revolvers. There's some debate about whether or not the .45 Colt was actually more effective against the Moros than the .38 Long Colt--I've seen some sources that said nothing but 12Ga shotguns stopped them authoritatively.
There are plenty of threads on this, im assuming we're not going to go here. Let's not ruin this thread with a "dangerous game" discussion that has no end.I think for bear one would do well to have a pump 12-gauge filled with rifled slugs and/or a high caliber rifle. For a handgun (I am thinking revolver), I am not sure what would be best but perhaps a 44? Would a 357 Mag be enough to stop a bear?
Illegal Possession of Hollow Nose or Hollow Point Bullets in New Jersey
Nothing surprises me anymore with states like NY, NJ CA and several other states. Actually I have heard but not researched that other states have similar laws. But note in NJ law who may carry HP bullet ammunition. Go figure huh?
Ron
Sorry, I suppose I get sidetracked too easily.There are plenty of threads on this, im assuming we're not going to go here. Let's not ruin this thread with a "dangerous game" discussion that has no end.
Thank you for that information. I was NYC born and grew up there. Living in Ohio now. My wife and I make yearly trips back to the big apple and I actually sanitize the truck before we go back. Making sure there is no ammunition or even reloading components, let alone a gun along for the ride. Not so much for NJ but for NY. Anyway thank you for the informative read.I travel and carry through New Jersey often, yes hollow points are a no no in that state. Hornady Critical Defense or Critical Duty with the nylon nose piece is not considered a hollow point, that is the get around. If you are carrying a snubby where expansion is a sometimes deal a good SWC or Full Wadcutter is an option. If you reload RimRock makes a very nice 158 grain SWC with an extra wide nose, nice sharp shoulder and excellent frontal area.
https://rimrockbullets.com/xcart/tsh-38-357-mag-158-gr-swc-wn-per-200.html