45 vs 9MM 1911

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have 4 1911s in 9mm S&W,Ruger lightweight comander,RIA and a Springfield RO all function very well and are as accurate as I can shoot. The Ruger needed a slightly heavier recoil spring to improve feeding.
 
In 9mm I've had good luck with metalform and, of course, Wilson Combat.
Isn't the RIA TAC 9 a double stack? At least I think that is what the OP is talking about. https://www.armscor.com/firearms/ria/tac-series/tac-ultra-fs-hc-9mm/

I don't think either Metalform or Wilson Combat offer mags for that gun.

That's pretty much my point in post #25 above. You can probably count double stack 1911/2011 makers on one hand and not all double stack mags work in all of them. STI/Staccato is probably the best of breed, and I don't believe their mags work in the RIA guns.
 
There is a certain undeniable and satisfying feel to shooting a 45-caliber 1911.

Nevertheless, I have had two basic Government Model Colts in 9mm and they have been as reliable, accurate, and fun as any of my 45s.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Demi-human
In any gun other than a 1911 I prefer 9mm over 45. But to me a 1911 in 9mm just isn't right. Or any other cartridge except possibly 38 Super.

I freely admit this is purely personal preference, but you did ask for opinions. That is mine. But do what makes YOU happy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Axis II
I have a Springfield Range Officer in 9x19. It shoots fine.

I prefer a 38 Super over the 9mm in a 1911 but I do reload.
I thought about getting something like super or 45 because I do load but I am trying to keep cost down.
 
I have 10 1911's currently in 45, 9mm, 38 Super and 22lr.
From 3.5" to 5," Rock Island to Wilson Combat.

Love to shoot them all.
 
Jesus man. That’s like buying a muscle car with a V6 or decaffeinated coffee or wearing a skirt and calling it a kilt. :p. :)

In all seriousness I just like 1911’s in .45. There are plenty of awesome 9mm choices and I am sure a 9mm 1911 would be great but there is just something about that platform and .45 that just needs to be for me. This isn’t a caliber/ballistic thing just a gun nerd thing.
I agree 100% it’s a traditional thing but again I am cheap and need to cut cost anywhere I can.
 
Isn't the RIA TAC 9 a double stack? At least I think that is what the OP is talking about. https://www.armscor.com/firearms/ria/tac-series/tac-ultra-fs-hc-9mm/

I don't think either Metalform or Wilson Combat offer mags for that gun.

That's pretty much my point in post #25 above. You can probably count double stack 1911/2011 makers on one hand and not all double stack mags work in all of them. STI/Staccato is probably the best of breed, and I don't believe their mags work in the RIA guns.
Either that or the rock series which looks like the GI but black.
 
Isn't the RIA TAC 9 a double stack? At least I think that is what the OP is talking about. https://www.armscor.com/firearms/ria/tac-series/tac-ultra-fs-hc-9mm/

I don't think either Metalform or Wilson Combat offer mags for that gun.

That's pretty much my point in post #25 above. You can probably count double stack 1911/2011 makers on one hand and not all double stack mags work in all of them. STI/Staccato is probably the best of breed, and I don't believe their mags work in the RIA guns.

My TAC 10mm is single stack.

https://www.armscor.com/firearms/ria/tac-series/tac-ultra-fs-10mm/

I do see the only TAC single stack they have 9mm is a compact, sure.
 
One should not poo-poo the 9mm in a 1911. Since they are now coming out of a 5" barrel, they equal (or exceed) the muzzle energy of a 45. With much less recoil.

A 230 grain bullet at 860 fps produces 378 ft. lbs muzzle energy.

115 grain bullets run at 1185 fps from a 4" barrel = 359 ft. lbs muzzle energy. Add an inch to that and you gain around 50 fps. Now at 1235 fps from a 5" barrel = 389 ft. lbs muzzle energy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nettlle
Isn't the RIA TAC 9 a double stack? At least I think that is what the OP is talking about. https://www.armscor.com/firearms/ria/tac-series/tac-ultra-fs-hc-9mm/

I don't think either Metalform or Wilson Combat offer mags for that gun.

That's pretty much my point in post #25 above. You can probably count double stack 1911/2011 makers on one hand and not all double stack mags work in all of them. STI/Staccato is probably the best of breed, and I don't believe their mags work in the RIA guns.

I think the RIAs use Para double stack mags.
 
I thought about getting something like super or 45 because I do load but I am trying to keep cost down.
It all depends on how you value your reloading time. I enjoy reloading as a hobby unto itself.

Under normal times, my reloads, 38 Super and 9mm, are better than the junkie surplus 9mm ammunition available and are cheaper than any quality 9mm ammunition.

As I said in my first post, a 9x19 M1911 will serve you well. I'd just prefer 38 Super.

I'm a M1911 junkie. I have M1911's chambered in 7 different cartridges, 45 ACP, 40 S&W, 357 SIG, 38/45 Clerke, 38 Super, 9x19, and 22LR.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bannockburn
I've had Colts in 9mm Commander and .45 in Mil spec, now recently bought a Springfield 9mm Ronin 4.25 model. The .45 is a great shooter but if all you want is paper punching...I'd say 9mm. A full size 5" 9 would be a great all-day shooter I think, I went with a Commander size again because it was available and a good price. Two friends have RIA's in .45 and these are quality pistols as well.
 
I have Ruger lightweight CMDs in 45 acp and 9mm - recoil with the 9mm is noticeably less.
 
I have a RIA 1911 GI Standard .45ACP, it's accurate and it goes bang every time. No complaints and great value for the money.
 
I have RIA 1911's in 9mm and 45acp.

They are accurate and reliable.

9mm 1911's are fun and I've never had any trouble with them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JR24
It amuses me how much some folks seem to equate manliness with the .45 ACP.
I have Ruger lightweight CMDs in 45 acp and 9mm - recoil with the 9mm is noticeably less.

Lightweight 1911s, especially in a CCO or Officer is really where the 9mm shines. Nice compact carry package with 8 or 10 +1 that shoots smooth and easy with that fine, fine 1911 trigger.

Whereas lightweight .45s, while nice, are a good bit slower with the recoil and not nearly as pleasant to shoot at the range.

If I want a lightweight 1911 for carry, I want 9mm or .38 Super.

If I'm going lightweight in a .45, I'm going for a polymer over a lightweight 1911, after years of owning, carrying and shooting both.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bannockburn
Never had a Colt Government in 9mm. though I have had a number of Colt Combat Commanders and Commanders in .38 Super. The gun is easily converted to 9mm. with just a simple barrel swap and 9mm. magazines with a spacer inside of them. Works just fine and I get to use less expensive 9mm. ammo for range time.
gd9AjQ0.jpg
 
The .38 Super is a great 1911 caliber to shoot, almost bought one when I had my Commander in 9mm, but being unfamiliar with it at the time I shied away. The mistakes we make, Huh?
 
JR24
Lightweight 1911s, especially in a CCO or Officer is really where the 9mm shines. Nice compact carry package with 8 or 10 +1 that shoots smooth and easy with that fine, fine 1911 trigger.

Whereas lightweight .45s, while nice, are a good bit slower with the recoil and not nearly as pleasant to shoot at the range.

If I want a lightweight 1911 for carry, I want 9mm or .38 Super.

I definitely will go along with that but I would also have to say that my Colt Lightweight Government .45 is easy to carry, handles and balances nicely, and is pretty decent at handling recoil (though I like to run 185 and 200 gr. handloads through it instead of the usual 230 gr. FMJ ammo).
pIxb2Mq.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.