Stinger, I know this has been a major frustration for you, and since I have the Lee 4 die set, resizer/expander-powder drop/seater/crimp die here, I loaded a dummy round to see if there is maybe some illumination I can bring to you. Understand that I am loading this on an RCBS Rockchucker IV.
Step 1-Install the shell holder, raise the ram to the top of its stroke and screw in the full length resizer until it touches the shell holder. Screw the lock ring down finger tight. I resized a W-W case, once fired and took a measurement. Case length is now .891". Case mouth is .467". Case wall thickness is .012".
Step two-raise the ram and screw the expander down until it touches the shell holder, then lower the ram and screw the die out (CCW) one full turn, and tighten the lock ring finger tight.
I put the resized case in and ran it up into the die at this setting. It flared the case mouth just a little bit, but not enough to where the bullet base will completely enter the case. I turned the die very little-like maybe 1/32nd of a turn and ran the case up again until I got a .472" measurement on the case mouth.
As I do not have any Raniers handy at this time, I used a Midway generic plated 185 grain flat nosed bullet which measures .450" at the base. This was enough for the bullet to just sit square on the case mouth without tipping to one side or another. Case below the belling is still at .467" O.D. Just to see what would happen, I turned the expander die in slightly more and ran the case into it, and came up with a .475" reading. I then ran the empty case back into the seating die and it came out with a .472" reading.
Step Three-Raise the ram, and screw the bullet seating die down until it touches the ram, then lower the ram and unscrew the die 3 full turns. Finger tighten the lock ring, then back out the seating screw until you see the first thread on it. I ran the empty case without the bullet all the way into the die. The case mouth did not change in diameter-still at .472". I then ran the case up with the bullet and turned the seating screw in short increments until I got an overall length of 1.260", which for this application works well for my Gold Cup, Government model, Combat Commander and Officers Model. The area behind the bullet is still at .467".
Step 4-although I did not need to, I set up the Taper Crimp die by raising the ram, screwing the die in until it touched the shell holder, finger tightening the lock ring, and backing out the the adjusting screw 3 turns. Ran the cartridge into the die fully, then turned the adjusting screw until it touched the top of the bullet. I felt a very slight resistance when I ran the cartridge into this die, and I can see where the very edge of the casemouth was barely kissed by this die.
Lee states that for a light crimp, to turn the adjusting screw 1/2 turn for a light crimp and a full turn for a heavy crimp. I did this, and on measurement, a half turn crimped the case mouth .001", to a measurement of .471". Another half turn took the case mouth to .470". All other dimensions remained the same.
So, it being 0115 hrs and nothing better to do, I decided to test with the same style bullet with seating and crimping in the same operation. I found absolutely no dimensional difference between the two rounds. Both have the same measurements, except one. I chambered both rounds thru my Combat Commander, and found that with a light taper crimp, the cartridge length remained the same. However, when a heavy taper crimp was applied, I experienced some bullet setback after 3 attempts to chamber. BTW, the cartridges loaded from the magazine very smoothly-no hesitation or bobbling whatsoever. I used a shooting star mag for the test.
I've never been a big fan of heavy taper crimps in a 1911 style pistol unless the chamber dimensions demand it. If you consider that the case mouth sets the headspace while in battery, I'd like to have as much of that skinny piece of brass contacting the end of the chamber as possible. I did notice that on the heavy taper crimp that the case mouth is visibly digging into the bullet, and I don't see that as accuracy enhancing.