9/11 Was an Inside Job

[ResearchGuy]

http://911research.wtc7.net/index.html

9-11 Research
An Attempt to Uncover the Truth About September 11th, 2001
We all know the official story of September 11th: four jetliners were hijacked by groups of four and five Arabic men armed with box cutters, who proceeded to fly three of the four jets into the Twin Towers and the Pentagon. Subsequently the World Trade Center Towers, weakened by the impacts and fires, collapsed into piles of rubble. Later in the afternoon 47-story Building 7, also weakened by fire, collapsed. (Or did you miss that detail?) The FBI had compiled a list of hijackers within three days, and it was so obvious that Osama bin Laden had masterminded the operation from caves in Afghanistan, that there was no need to seriously investigate the crime or produce evidence. The "retaliatory" attack on the Taliban would soon commence.

Is this story true? Its central assumptions have never been seriously tested. There are numerous red flags in the official story, which requires a long series of highly improbable coincidences. Questioning that story is an act of responsible citizenship.

9-11RESEARCH DEBUNKS NIST'S WTC REPORT

NEW: Building a Better Mirage: NIST's 3-Year $20,000,000 Cover-Up of the Crime of the Century -- NIST's Report sidesteps the very question it purported to investigate: what caused the total destruction of the World Trade Center's Twin Towers? Version 1.0, just published, critiques NIST's Final Report.

... RESPONDS TO MAINSTREAM PRESS ATTACKS

RECENT: Scientific American's Dishonest Attack On 911Research

RELATED: Popular Mechanics Magazine Targets 9/11 Skepticism

... AND CONFRONTS EFFORTS TO SABOTAGE 9/11 TRUTH

NEW: Revealed OR Concealed?: A Critical Review of 9/11 Revealed -- A book purporting to speak for the 9/11 Truth Movement pushes long-discredited hoaxes.

RECENT: A Critical Review of Morgan Reynolds' Why Did the Trade Center Skyscrapers Collapse? -- Former US Labor Department chief economist sandwiches bad science between rehash of demolition evidence.

RELATED: The Pentagon No-757-Crash Theory: Booby Trap for 9/11 Skeptics -- The flawed Pentagon no-jetliner theory is the most successful idea used to keep 9/11 Truth marginalized.

 

[springmom]

Yup.

And I'm the Easter bunny.

Springmom

 

[TexasRifleman]

Hey ResearchGuy, your fly is unzipped......

What happened Justin? You wanted to see the fur fly after all?

 

[Justin]

I'm just a jerk that way.

Also, I don't want to poach on Art's territory.

 

[molonlabe]

Getch red hot AFDB while they last. There are rumors the guberment is going to ban alumunum foil folowed shortly therafter by automobiles, booze, guns, ammo, knives, and large pointy sticks.

http://zapatopi.net/afdb/

 

[Old Dog]

His first post, too ...

 

[Technosavant]

Oh, really?

You know, I guess you are right. I will completely forget everything I have learned thus far about it on the authority of some guy on the internet who makes his FIRST post to a firearms board, and it doesn't even have anything to do with guns!

Good thing I wasn't over at Sarah Brady's site, I guess.

 

[taliv]

coincidentally, i almost posted this most excellent bit of tinfoil hattery a few hrs ago, but decided it was off topic.

enjoy


(I remain undecided myself)


edit: btw, that link goes to google video... it's about an hour long. worth the watch, if for nothing more than the video archives of the towers collapsing. it is a compilation of most of the professional and amature videos of the event

 

[Fly320s]

Hey, molonlabe,

Can I get mine in a double, with gold plating?

 

[telomerase]

There are rumors the guberment is going to ban alumunum foil

Well, they did double the price of aluminum by keeping scrap aircraft off the market in 1946... forcing people to use the more expensive tinfoil for hats.

 

[Sheldon J]

Attack of the tinfoil hat Bush haters

This has been gone over in great detail and not just on the internet where you can put any nutcse theory out for others to laugh at. Even 60 minutes covered this finding no truth to the issues and they hate Bush. :banghead:

 

[nfl1990]

RELATED: Popular Mechanics Magazine Targets 9/11 Skepticism

That article pretty much disproved EVERY conspiracy theroy related to 9/11.

 

[Hkmp5sd]

Isn't it truly amazing that the same people that believe our government is a bunch of idiots that invaded Iraq only to find no WMD, can on the other hand, pull off a virtually impossible operation convincing hundreds of millions of people worldwide that terrorists flew airliners into buildings, collapsing them and killing thousands?

 

[lostone1413]

Hard to really say. Seen alot of people that aren't dummies say that it would be impossible for the towers to fall the way they want you to believe. Guess it gets down to if you trust your goverment and the cooperate elite who really run the country.

 

[Standing Wolf]

It was a conspiracy, I tell you, a gosh-darned no good evil un-American conspiracy.

You know: the kind we like best.

 

[palerider1]

please dont start another conspiracy theory like the Kennedy assasination. some people have too much imagination. take 9/11 for what it is.

 

[Phaetos]

Go away troll!

 

[c_yeager]

Yes, Bush and company staged 9/11 to justify a war in Iraq. It was the most complex and intricately planned operation in the history of the world. Then in the midst of the turmoil in Iraq someone just forgot to write "WMD" on the side of a crate and plant it in an abandoned warehouse in Iraq. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.

Good conspiracy theories arent supposed to fall apart untill you start stabbing at their soft underbelly of details and facts. This one is laughable on it's face, and frankly, anyone who buys it is standing underneath all of the UFO people on the ladder of mockery.

 

[Wllm. Legrand]

Well, well, well....

If some of you smarmy, sarcastic, "smart guys" who have not researched the issue beyond that of what you read in the "mainstream media" (a venue that seems to be replete with faults, by the admissions of most persons) can explain the numerous inconsistencies, statistical impossibilities, and best of all, WHY BUILDING # 7 FELL when it did not suffer significant damage, then do so. Until then, throw out your ad hominum "tinfoil hat" garbage accusations. It really is quite amusing to read the posts of people who don't believe the government in so many things, yet believe the crappola that dispensed from day one about the 9/11 conspiracy. Yes, it was a conspiracy. Do you believe the unbelievable that the government tells you or is there perhaps another explanation that may cover all, or at least more, of the availble facts?

Until you know what you're talking about, why dont' you spend less time in front of a t.v. and read up on the subject. I have. As with so may things that are "common knowledge" or things that "everybody knows", the official explanation for 9/11 is Bravo Sierra. I used to belive in the fairy tales and the official line about the "Civil War" and Saint Abraham Lincoln, too...but with effort ignorance doesn't last forever.

It's unbelievable the things you have to believe to accept the official story as true.

 

[rock jock]

Well, well, well....

If some of your smarmy, sarcastic, "smart guys" who have not researched the issue beyond that of what you read in the "mainstream media" (a venue that seems to be replete with faults, by the admissions of most persons) can explain the numerous inconsistencies, statistical impossibilities, and best of all, WHY BUILDING # 7 FELL when it did not suffer significant damage, then throw out your ad hominum "tinfoil hat" garbage accusations. It really is quite silly to read people who don't believe the government in so many things believes the crappola that dispensed from day one about the 9/11 conspiracy. Yes, it was a conspiracy. Do you believe the unbelievable that the government tells you or is there perhaps another explanation that may cover all, or at least more, of the availble facts?

Until you know what you're talking about, why dont' you spend less time in front of a t.v. and read up on the subject. I have. As with so may things that are "common knowledge" or things that "everybody knows", the official explanation for 9/11 is Bravo Sierra. I used to belive in the fairy tales and the official line about the "Civil War" and Saint Abraham Lincoln, too...but with effort ignorance doesn't last forever.

It's unbelievable the things you have to believe to accept the official story as true.

No significant damage, huh? I guess what we saw on TV was just a model plane. I love people who couldn't even explain an overturning moment dismissing the straighforward explanations of PhD structural engnineers.

 

[Wllm. Legrand]

And?

 

[Hkmp5sd]

Until you know what you're talking about, why dont' you spend less time in front of a t.v. and read up on the subject. I have. As with so may things that are "common knowledge" or things that "everybody knows", the official explanation for 9/11 is Bravo Sierra.

I have read (and still have in my personal libarary) about 50 books on 9/11, including several that debunk this conspiracy junk issue by issue. How many do I have to read before I can make an educated conclusion?

BTW, how does building #7 collapsing affect anything? If is was still standing, the government would still have acted in the same manner. Why was it necessary to collapse that single building to aid the conspiracy? The government would have invaded Afghanistan if none of the buildings had collapsed.

 

[Wllm. Legrand]

No significant damage, huh? I guess what we saw on TV was just a model plane. I love people who couldn't even explain an overturning moment dismissing the straighforward explanations of PhD structural engnineers.

What in G*d's name are you TALKING ABOUT?

Bldg. 7 was not struck by any plane. You DO know that three buildings fell that day, don't you?

 

[Wllm. Legrand]

I have read (and still have in my personal libarary) about 50 books on 9/11, including several that debunk this conspiracy junk issue by issue. How many do I have to read before I can make an educated conclusion?

BTW, how does building #7 collapsing affect anything? If is was still standing, the government would still have acted in the same manner. Why was it necessary to collapse that single building to aid the conspiracy? The government would have invaded Afghanistan if none of the buildings had collapsed.

The above quote makes as much sense as reading Sandburg's biography of LIncoln and still believing the "Standard Model" for the Civil War.

The collapse of bldg #7 not be significant? Brother, I've got bridge in Brooklyn to sell you, in that case.

I am not postulating any specific theory, but am saying that the official conspiracy theory that is pure crappola. Oh..and yes, I guess Oswald DID do it by himself. Yeah, that's the ticket....

I imagine people who probably haven't had even a high school physics class can believe the official line. The simple, concise, packaged official story line is bunk. I'm all for Occam's Razor, but not on this.

 

[seansean]

I SWEAR I'm not trying to start a flame war, but....as someone who is a NY'er, and has been in just about every part of WTC 1, 2, and 7, multiple times, (I had a job as a messenger),I don't buy the official story either. Never did. This guy may be a troll, but he's right about 7 world trade. It collapsed, and it wasn't hit by anything. Gerald Posner is THE guy the MSM likes to trot out to debunk anyone who questions the official story...his theory is that diesel fuel stored in the basement of wtc7 caught fire somehow, weakening the steel and making the building collapse...not a plausible explanation to me. I don't claim to know what happened, but it didn't happen the way the U.S. gov SAYS it happened, IMO. Don't even get me started on the lack of air defense, considering the amount of bases with intercept aircraft on the east coast. Somethin' ain't right, that's all I'm saying.