9/11 Was an Inside Job

[Hkmp5sd]

Actually, it looks like we may be in agreement on the Civil War, however...


As stated, if building #7 had not collapsed, what would be different today?? Are you saying building #7 collapsing PROVES that the twin towers were blown up instead of collapsing from damage?

Time for the old padlock.

 

[Kim]

I can not believe anyone would even consider this bunk. There is about 10% of the population that is paranoid schizophrenic and a certain number of those are off their medication. This is a fact.

 

[JohnKSa]

Then in the midst of the turmoil in Iraq someone just forgot to write "WMD" on the side of a crate and plant it in an abandoned warehouse in Iraq. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.

Yup, managed to fool the entire world about 9/11 in spite of the fact that it happened in plain view in one of the largest cities in the world, and then we couldn't even manage to plant a few WMDs in Iraq, a country over which (at the time) we had virtually complete military control.

Amazing how that works, huh...

 

[Wllm. Legrand]

I SWEAR I'm not trying to start a flame war, but....as someone who is a NY'er, and has been in just about every part of WTC 1, 2, and 7, multiple times, (I had a job as a messenger),I don't buy the official story either. Never did. This guy may be a troll, but he's right about 7 world trade. It collapsed, and it wasn't hit by anything. Gerald Posner is THE guy the MSM likes to trot out to debunk anyone who questions the official story...his theory is that diesel fuel stored in the basement of wtc7 caught fire somehow, weakening the steel and making the building collapse...not a plausible explanation to me. I don't claim to know what happened, but it didn't happen the way the U.S. gov SAYS it happened, IMO. Don't even get me started on the lack of air defense, considering the amount of bases with intercept aircraft on the east coast. Somethin' ain't right, that's all I'm saying.

That is EXACTLY my point.

p.s. I hope you are not referring to ME as the troll.

 

[bjbarron]

I SWEAR I'm not trying to start a flame war, but....as someone who is a NY'er, and has been in just about every part of WTC 1, 2, and 7, multiple times, (I had a job as a messenger),I don't buy the official story either. Never did. This guy may be a troll, but he's right about 7 world trade.

I was there too, and watched it from a highrise up by 40th and Madison. I see it a bit differently.

With the force those things hit the ground, and the way the debris spread out for blocks around, I'm just surprised that all the adjacent buildings didn't come down. Most of them had damage to the face toward the WTC, and at least one of them is still under repair and may need to come down even now. I took this picture in June.

This wasn't a controlled demolition like you see on the tube...this was a freakin’ nightmare. Look at the footprint....

 

[Wllm. Legrand]

Actually, it looks like we may be in agreement on the Civil War, however...


As stated, if building #7 had not collapsed, what would be different today?? Are you saying building #7 collapsing PROVES that the twin towers were blown up instead of collapsing from damage?

Time for the old padlock.

On the contrary. I'm not about to commit that fallacy. My point is that there are inconsistencies that obligate a critical thinker to reconsider the premises of those that dish out the offical line. When you encounter an inconsistency, re-examine those premises. It doesn't pass the smell test.

There are plenty of such inconsistencies.

 

[Wllm. Legrand]

I can not believe anyone would even consider this bunk. There is about 10% of the population that is paranoid schizophrenic and a certain number of those are off their medication. This is a fact.

Perhaps. And half the population couldn't tell you the sides in the WW I and WWII. Most couldn't tell you how water condenses out of the air. Most people are flippin' stupid nowadays, the younger, the more stupid.

Heck, most people believe that Germany was the "BAD GUY" in WW I. Just because a lot of people believe something does not make it so. Recent history is rife with examples.

Or does it need to be spelled out?

 

[Wllm. Legrand]

Time for the old padlock.

I guess I'm just new here...Whenever a contentious issue is discussed, one where sensibilities may be offended, threads are "locked"?

 

[seansean]

I was there too, and watched it from a highrise up by 40th and Madison. I see it a bit differently.

With the force those things hit the ground, and the way the debris spread out for blocks around, I'm just surprised that all the adjacent buildings didn't come down. Most of them had damage to the face toward the WTC, and at least one of them is still under repair and may need to come down even now. I took this picture in June.

This wasn't a controlled demolition like you see on the tube...this was a freakin’ nightmare.

I hear what you're saying, but damage is one thing, actual collapse is another. Where I'm at right now with this is, I just think there are valid reasons to doubt the official story. It's more than a tin-foil hat thing; The reason people mock this is that no one wants to believe our own govt. would ever do such a thing. But considering how many other lies we've been told about iraq and the WOT, is lying about 9/11 really so crazy? I don't think it is.

 

[Art Eatman]

"Whenever a contentious issue is discussed, one where sensibilities may be offended, threads are "locked"?"

First, go back and read the rules, and please understand that the primary purpose of this website is "to promote RKBA".

Some subjects are forbidden because experience since 1998 shows that they invariably--repeat, invariably--lead to high emotion and ensuing flame wars.

Some threads are locked because the subject is not "on topic" for the website.

This one ran as long as it has because I took BossLady out to dinner with friends and wasn't around at diaper-changing time. But now I am, so:

Nighty-bye.

Art