Advice on high-capacity 9 mm?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 25, 2005
Messages
553
Location
Kentucky
I am in the market for a high capacity 9 mm Pistol and I am looking for advice or at least the opportunity to bounce my thoughts around. :banghead:

First, a little background so you will have some idea on my thinking on this:

I used to own a S&W 915 and it was a quite decent gun. In several years of use (a couple of thousand rounds) I never had a malfunction and accuracy was quite good. I also entertained the thought of getting a Marlin Camp Carbine to go with it since the Marlin can use the same magazines as the S&W, though I never did get around to buying one. The one thing I didn't like about the S&W was the magazine safety, which I felt was fragile.

Last year I traded the S&W off for a factory-reconditioned Sig P226. Partially this was "upgrading" and partially (or at least that's what I told myself at the time) it was so that my high capacity 9 mm would have the same manual of arms as my carry gun, a Sig P225. My 226 was a superb gun. My pistol shooting scores in the informal 3-Gun matches at the local gun club went up immediately. The only thing I didn't like about the Sig was that the only readily-available carbine with magazine compatibility was the Kel-Tech Sub 2000 - I just don't like that much plastic in my guns.

Back in December I parted with the P226 for personal reasons (long story), and now I am looking to replace it. Unfortunately, I can't afford a new Sig. I still have magazines for the Sig and I still have a few magazines for the S&W.

I really like the idea of being able to acquire a carbine that could share magazines with whatever pistol I choose, although I'm not absolutely wedded to this concept. I could still get a Marlin and just acquire some of the longer 20 and 30 round magazines so that there should be no issue with mixing up two different types of magazines.

I don't really like Glocks or Springfield XDs, though I'm not trying to knock them. I just prefer a gun that allows me a second strike on a dud round without having to work the slide. I also am not a fan of polymer-frame guns, though I might get a Kel-Tec P-11 at some point as a car gun (but that's because they are cheap and can use the S&W mags I have left over). I may eventually get one or the other of these, but I'm not interested in one at the moment.

To further complicate my thinking, an acquaintance on another board got me thinking about the CZ 75 series. They are very good guns, great ergonomics and priced extremely reasonably. Also, a decocker model is available, though the decocker is placed differently from the Sig 225. Downside is that there are no carbines that use the same magazines.

Sigh. Choices, choices.

I would like to hear your thoughts on this.

Thank you.
 
Hmm...maybe a used Sig? I'm sure other members can point you in the right direction for one. I'm pretty sure I've seen many people list places you can get refurbished or slighty used ones at pretty reasonable prices.
 
I have a Sig and a CZ. I would say go with the CZ. Feels better in the hand, just as reliable, mine has better accuracy. and last but not least, it costs a lot less.

Jack( just my 2 cents, and worth every penny)
 
Janos Dracwlya said:
I don't really like Glocks or Springfield XDs, though I'm not trying to knock them. I just prefer a gun that allows me a second strike on a dud round without having to work the slide.

I understand your concern, but how often, really, have you encountered a dud? And, if the FTF is really a dud round, you're gonna need to rack the slide anyway.

But, if you want a nice DA 9mm, how about the original SW99? I had one and it is a great gun. Don't know if there are any new DA's (true DA first shot), but, if not, you should be able to find a nice used one.

K
 
CZ SP01...18 round mag....ledgendary CZ ergonomics, reliabilty, etc. Regretfully, you are correct - no carbines take CZ mags that I am aware of.
 
I believe you can still find Ruger Police Carbines that use the same magazines as the Ruger 9mm.
 
Bernardelli P-1 or P-018, either with 17+1 capability and fairly low cost.

Tanfoglio and Bernardelli have teamed up to manufacture hi-capacity 9mms.

976608995-1.jpg


Tanfoglio (EAA Witness) is a high-quality, low cost weapon with durability.
 
The Ruger P95-series gets a lot of good press. The limited amount of shooting I've done with one has been a unilaterally pleasant experience. Accurate, reliable, and the Army just picked up a bunch of them for their motor pool people.

Good luck on finding what you want/need,
mark(psycho)Phipps( HAHAHA! )
 
I 2nd Baretta, especially with some hogue wrap around grips. Friends and fellow shooters never cease to comment on how comfortable my 96 is with that setup.
 
Yep, that's how mine was. I put a couple thousand rounds through it. Not a single failure of any kind. Beretta's are very refined and well built. Simple to take down for cleaning. Reliable. Comfortable. Perty too.

I had a stainless Brigadier Inox 96. I wish I hadn't sold it. Now I'm just another 1911 freak. Damn that thin carryable profile and nearly travel-less trigger :mad:
 
I've seen a lot of used Beretta 92's selling for under $400 recently. Since they usually have quite a bit of finish wear I suspect they're police trade-ins. As long as they work they'll do fine for your needs. If you're actually not that money-strapped then I say a used or CPO SIG would be even better.
 
I'm a die hard Ruger man,but when it came time to buy a 9mm, I went with a CZ75B. It was the best pointing gun I ever picked up, and for a 16 round cap gun, it fits in my hand great. CZ's are dead nut accurate guns!
 
Many thanks for everyone's advice.

I am going to a big gun show this weekend in Louisville, so I will keep all of this advice in mind.

I notice that nobody suggested going back to a S&W. Do they have a bad reputation?

Thanks again.

Janos
 
S&W are just kinda meh. That, and even though they have new owners, selling out to Bill Clinton was barely forgivable. But I do think that was when their owners were in England, so what would you expect.

I think S&W makes some fine 1911's with their Scandium line. I got a chance to shoot one at the range and was impressed. Moreso with those than with Para-ords new 1911's, which I was not impressed with. Felt sloppy.
 
MarshallDodge said:
I would think once you have had a Sig you would never go back. I had a Smith 5906 and while it was a good gun my Sig was more accurate and had a better trigger. My buddy purchased a used P226 from these guys and it was a good gun with holster wear: http://www.kyimports.com/tarus.htm#sig

Thanks for mentioning KY Imports, Marshal Dodge.

I'm familiar with them, though I've never been to their store. They have good prices on Sigs (and just about anything else they carry). I am actually hoping they will have a booth at the show Saturday.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top