It perhaps is directed in the sense that it is the fallback when the original position, that Holder was involved in the orchestration of a gun walking plan, was shown to be indefensible using the evidence..
Or perhaps not. We wont know until the documents are reviewd. You seem to play the "perhaps its just someting else game" but never really answer 'why dont they just turn over the documents?'
The original premise of Holder orchestrating gun walking to promote gun control hasn't held water, and that much is suggested with the move to focus on an alleged cover up by Holder after the gun walking plan had already completed.
Uh... No. If we learn the 'what, when, whys, and hows, of the cover up, we are likely to quickly get to WHO orchestrated it as the cover up documents will point to WHO they are protecting.
Again, if there were no crimes and therefore, no cover up, Why dont they turn over the documents?
The "how" isn't going to be answered with the documents from after the operation.
And how do you know that? If they documents show Mr. XYZ ordered it... that going to point to 'how'. It seems that you're quick to dismiss the need for the whole truth supported by all of the documents.
And the "why" as being discussed in this thread is about finding the answers that the questioners are looking for,...
The answers the questioners are looking for is the simple truth. Again, if no crimes or cover up was committed... why not just turn over the documents?
.....see the above section and see the posts at the very beginning which claimed that it went all the way up even though the evidence hadn't supported their beliefs.
Absent the documents... of course people are going to speculate. There's a simple solution to end the speculation; Turn over the documents and let the truth get out.
They gave him the same treatment as the race baiters who read the first articles on Zimmerman and claimed that he shot Martin because he was black, then pointed at articles that came out later as their justification.
Lets stay on topic. This isnt related. Again, just relase the documents and let the truth be free.
They already had a meeting where they were briefed on the withheld documents, but any thing less than the complete documents was insufficient for their demands.
As it should be! Again, it seems you're quick to dismiss wanting the whole truth.
Holder didnt remember, or recall, or was unaware of, and handfull of very important things that later came out he did. How did that happen? Documents proved it.
He has proven to not be a good witness with selective memory at best.
They've only turned over something like 10% of the documents and the AG office has selected the documents of that paltry %.
I think America deserve the whole truth and nothing but the truth instead of selective memory and selective documents.
Beautiful false dichotomy. Anyone who doesn't agree to your position automatically has an agenda. Furthermore, the push to see a coverup wherever possible is not at all an agenda unto itself.
And anyone that disagrees with your position gets the 'perhaps it was something else' deflection and 'throw in some unrelated tangets to try rationalize it away' .
The push to see documents is nothing more than search for the truth. Regardless of political party, I support it.
I'll say again,
I think America deserve the whole truth and nothing but the truth instead of selective memory and selective documents.
This thread can keep going around in circles with unrelated diversions of analizing tactics of politics.
But were not talking politics.
So, please explain why you dont think America deserves the whole truth supported by all of the documents instead of proven selective memory supported by selective documents.