Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

AN94 vs M16 .. which is superior?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by sharpshooter74, Apr 29, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. sharpshooter74

    sharpshooter74 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2007
    Messages:
    106
    you tell me
     
  2. PvtPyle

    PvtPyle Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    733
    Location:
    Draper UT
    Who knows. The AN-94 saw limited deployment at best and is now sidelined. On longevity alone, it's the AR.
     
  3. PercyShelley

    PercyShelley Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,075
    Indeed. Has anyone stateside gotten a really good look at the Nikonov?

    'Tis a mysterious rifle indeed, to say nothing of strange.
     
  4. Wes Janson

    Wes Janson Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1,962
    You mean have any civilians stateside gotten a really good look at the Nikonov? I'd be deeply shocked if elements of the intelligence community had failed to procure examples for research purposes.

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/91/Izhmash_Nikonov_AN-94_GP-34.jpg

    There's a lot of strange things about that rifle that I'd love to pull apart and figure out..from the muzzle brake to the iron sights, it's one hell of an oddity.
     
  5. offshorebear

    offshorebear Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2007
    Messages:
    32
    I don't know anything about it, but it sounds like an AK with an interesting pully action that doubles the rate of fire that gives it a 2 round burst without recoil. Thats cool, but it makes it a lot more expensive and probably less reliable. So to answer your original question, what do you mean by superior?
     
  6. Tony Williams

    Tony Williams Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2004
    Messages:
    666
    Location:
    UK
    It's an interesting concept, and in theory the two-round "recoilless" burst not only improves the hit probabillity at long range but improves the effectiveness at shorter ranges, by hitting the same target twice virtually simultaneously.

    It is a very complex device, though - very unlike most Russian kit - so although it ought to be reliable initially, there's room to doubt its longevity. Something of a wrong turning for the Russians, I think. There were other guns in the competition won by the AN-94 which looked more interesting - but Max Popenker knows more about that.
     
  7. ConfuseUs

    ConfuseUs Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2007
    Messages:
    471
    Location:
    I live on a plain by a few mountains.
    As far as reliability goes, I've read (in AK-47: The gun that changed warfare by Larry Kahaner) that the AN-94 has a much lower failure rate than the AK-47/74 series in tests. That may be an exaggeration, but who knows?
     
  8. Ash

    Ash Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    5,358
    Location:
    Anywhere but here
    That would be hard to believe.

    Ash
     
  9. nalioth

    nalioth Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2007
    Messages:
    5,841
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    Why is it that any military rifle produced behind the former Iron Curtain is an "AK"?

    The AN94 was designed by Mr. Nikonov. It is not an AK.
    The AEK971 was designed by Mr. Koksharov. It is not an AK.
    The Vz58 was designed by Mr. Čermák. It is not an AK.

    Using the logic I've been seeing, the Miini-14, the Kel-Tec Su16, the XCR, the AR18 should all be called "AR(15)s" since they all were made here in the USA and the AR15 is our most well known military rifle.
     
  10. sharpshooter74

    sharpshooter74 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2007
    Messages:
    106
    Wondering

    I wonder how the AN94 compares to the M16s when it comes to functionality, reliability, and accuracy. I heard a while back that these guns will be used to replace the AK74, for the Russian Army. With the Russian economy roaring back up, I wonder if they actually have the money to produce this, since they said it was initially expensive to make.

    So far, I can't find any useful information about the AN94 on the internet. Anyone have any links, or diagram of what the internals are like for this rifle?
     
  11. Ash

    Ash Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    5,358
    Location:
    Anywhere but here
    Aren't these operating on the long recoil principle? In any case, the pistol grip sure looks awkward - almost as an after-thought. They just grabbed a good old AK pistol grip and screwed it on.

    Ash
     
  12. PvtPyle

    PvtPyle Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    733
    Location:
    Draper UT
    I had the oportunity to examine an AN94 in Afghanistan that was taken from a Chechan fighter in Lawara. We had a rep from NGIC Ground Weapon Systems on the FOB and the weapon was sent back thru the armsroom to be sent back to NGIC.

    I did not get a chance to test fire it, but we tore it down and played with it. Interesting design but I was not too impressed. Neither was he. The pulley system seemed fragile and already showed signs of wear. I'll stick with the M4 or AK-74 thanks.

    But I did keep the magazines that came with it.... :^)
     
  13. Wes Janson

    Wes Janson Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1,962
    Perhaps you can answer then: why the odd placement of the pistol grip?
     
  14. Evil Monkey

    Evil Monkey member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2006
    Messages:
    1,486
    Both rifles have their pros and cons but I view them as two different classes of weapons.

    The M16 is an Assault Rifle

    The AN94 is a Salvo Rifle

    The AN94 uses an unorthodox operating system to achieve results that would otherwise be unlikely or impossible to obtain with a common operating system, such as the DI gas operated system found in the M16.

    So you really can't compare the two.
     
  15. Ash

    Ash Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    5,358
    Location:
    Anywhere but here
    Except that they are both, at least in theory, designed for general issue. In that regard, it is perfectly fair to compare the two. Now, if you want to compare the T72 with an M109A6 Paladin Self Propelled Howitzer, you have a point as they are intended for two completely different roles.

    Or, in small arms, comparing the M4/M16 to the APS underwater assault rifle as they are intended for two completely different roles and would be issued in completely different ways.

    Ash
     
  16. max popenker

    max popenker Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    1,108
    Location:
    Russia
    to sum it up quickly, the AN-94 is almost dead. From what i know there are NO current plans to make it general issue weapon, and the entire concept behind it, as well as the "Abakan" trials, have more questions to it than answers.

    I had a chance to hold AN-94 (but not fired) and its ergonomics is crappy at its best. The selector switch is too small, the rear sight is one of the worst designs i ever saw, and entire gun felt awkward in my hands. Not to mention its complicated design, of cause.
     
  17. Ash

    Ash Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    5,358
    Location:
    Anywhere but here
    There is a tendency to assume the newest is the best. Can we say the 1941 Johnson was better than the M1? The Colombian Madsen better than the #4 Enfield?

    Just because it is newer than a 60 year old design does not make it better. Sometimes, they got it right the first time. With the AK, they did.

    Ash
     
  18. Evil Monkey

    Evil Monkey member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2006
    Messages:
    1,486
    So max what's going on with the AEK-971 and AK-107/108 rifles? Are those dead too?
     
  19. Acheron

    Acheron Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2007
    Messages:
    367
    Location:
    New Hampshire for school, Texas otherwise
    Was the AN94 ever intended to be a front-line weapon? I.E. replace the AK74? I always thought it was aimed more at the SpecOps/Spetsnaz guys.
     
  20. Ash

    Ash Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    5,358
    Location:
    Anywhere but here
    According to Max, it was to be adopted as a replacement for the AK-74.

    "The AN-94 assault rifle had been officially adopted by the Russian Army and the Ministry of Internal Affairs in 1994 as a possible replacement for the venerable Kalashnikov AK-74 series assault rifles. "

    http://world.guns.ru/assault/as08-e.htm

    Ash
     
  21. PercyShelley

    PercyShelley Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,075
    Kind of a severe understatement. The AN-94 constitutes a complete break with traditional assault rifle design worldwide.

    I don't think it would be too much to say that it represents a substantial break with small arms development worldwide!

    Any pics or other observations of the beast PvtPyle?

    and what is the Russian Federation looking at to replace their AKs with if not the AN-94? Nothing?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page