Another Taurus quality thread.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I really like buying used Taurus revolvers, most are fine and function as designed. The ones that don't go back and come home and work as designed at a fantastically low cash outlay. I take advantage at every opportunity. I heartily say thank you to all those detractors, whether you ever owned a Taurus or not.
Thank You!!!!!!
 
I've heard enough "bad" about Taurus that I don't discount the risk, but I've had a PT99 that was spot-on accurate and reliable, 2 PT-92 that were the same, and a Raging Bull that has (so far :rolleyes:) been accurate and reliable, even though I can't afford to feed it enough to really know for certain.
 
I have several Taurus handguns and like them as much as my S&W. They have not failed in any way. My 445 44 special is one of favorite carry guns, and the 357 magnum and model 85 38 sp is as good my S&W in function. My wife carries 32 H&R magnum snubby , and we both have several of their semi autos as well with no issues. Their customer service is better than most and a life-time warranty too. I like the company and their firearms.
 
I have own 3 taurus's, a pt940, a judge, and a 455 revolver in 45acp. I have had no problem with any of them and they all worked flawlessly. I just got the 455 and love it, one of my favorite's. I have never had a problem with any gun I have owned, at least not a big one, you know something I couldn't fix myself. Just to put in perspective I own a kimber cdp(had to get a new safety, oh their customer service rocks - the best), smith PC 629 hunter, and a desert eagle - all well over $1000 apiece and each one had a small problem that I was able to fix myself. Now the taurus's all under $500 and not a single thing I had to fix. I guess the point I am trying to make is any gun can have a problem no matter how good of a manufacture.
 
-My Wife bought her Taurus 85 new back in '93 or '94. We were at the range again about 10 days ago, and that .38 never missed a beat! I would have no regrets what-so-ever about using that revolver for CC. It shoots better than I can, and has never locked up like I've heard stories of others having happened. I gave it a little dance at the range when she was done shooting, and put 20 shots in a 5" circle on the target at the usual 21 - 25 ft self defense distance. It's been a while since we've been shooting, so after more practice those groups will probably shrink by about half...

L8R,
Matt
 
I have been lucky I guess. I have a Taurus PT1911, a PT 92 AFS, A 3" 38 special stainless (really good to shoot), a 4 inch 357 stainless mod 66 about 20 years old, a 38 Special +p Poly Protector, and a 4" 22 revolver. Unfortunately I have had not problems with them, (must have been lucky one of a kind buys?) I have several other handguns from Smith, Springfield, and a very old Charter Arms. I'm not married to Taurus but I have had exceedingly good luck with their products. I see/hear a lot of bashing about these, I believe that there is an element of gun snobbery involved? Not sure but I am lucky in that I can buy and shoot what I like.
just sayin
 
I had two Taurus that were trouble. A revolver and a semi. But I had a Smith semi and revolver go bad also.
 
I used to work at a gun store and we charged fifteen dollars less than other area stores for an FFL transfer. The only guns we ever had transferees come back with broken guns were two PT-92s ordered by two different guys several months apart. Both had broken locking blocks. When I was shooting for my CHL a woman couldn't get more than three rounds downrange out of her Millennium without a jam. I was thinking she was limp wristing it and mentioned it to the instructor. He took it and with her two mags...same result. I've been told by a now deceased gunsmith...I say that because he was a really good friend...was that Taurus and Rossi had heat treating issues. Makes sense with the two PT-92s coming back. Taurus and Rossi may very well have improved their metallurgy if that was actually a problem as all this happened more than a decade ago except for the CHL shoot.
 
To make a long story, shorter, my LGS sent it back to Taurus 3 times. I waited a month or two each time and it came back with no improvement. The LGS verified the problem and tried to get help through their Taurus rep. There was still no repair or replacement.


I'm curious if they decided not to do what really needs to be done with that particular problem due to cost.

Who paid shipping?
 
I have two older Taurus revolvers. I bought a first year SS 85 for carry and a 22lr version for practice. I finally had the 22 sent in as it would no longer reliable to fire a round. They put a new fireing pin in it and sent it back. Good as gold again. The 85 ss was a pocket pistol for 20 years and had a stock trigger no s&w could match, very smooth and fairly lite. After I retired it from CC I changed the hammer spring to a wolff RP spring to help my girls learn to shot DA centerfire. Visions of CC down the road. Trigger pull DA is 4 1/2lbs , SA is 2lbs. Reliable as heck. It has since then been used for 6 people to learn to shoot handguns and taken thru there class's. Only seen a couple s&w snubbies as good and they took a gun smith mess'n with them .

I read a claim the early Taurus 1911s were really good. Does that ring a bell to anyone?
 
I owned a Taurus 38 special revolver... I'm pretty sure it was the ultra lite model. I put just under 200 standard (250 round value pack) Remington rounds through it and the frame bent almost to the point to which I couldn't get the cylinder to come open. I called and emailed Taurus and they said to send it to them... After about 4 weeks they sent me an email stating that I had obviously used +P ammo in the gun and it was not rated for that and they refused to do anything for me... That was the last Taurus I ever bought and will never purchase another! Poor poor customer service experience ruined the brand for me!!

I think that model is rated for +P ammo. Is that correct? If so, they should have fixed it even then.
 
Updated Post #39

In Post 39 I said the jury was still out on my Taurus 941 22 Magnum revolver. Well a LGS finally has Speer Gold Dot ammo made for short barrel revolvers. I brought a couple of boxes and tested them with the gun. At seven long paces (7-8 yds) shooting unsupported two hand hold I put all 8 rounds into a 1 1/4" group hitting POA shooting double action.

It is a big understatement to say I am very impressed. At a gunshow I purchased a nylon holster for $15.00 and have been wearing it around the ranch. All I can say is the more I carry and use this little gun the more and more I like it. This is quite a change in my attitude from a few months ago when I was considering trading it for something else.

Just for the record I documented my experiences with the problems I had with the two 941s here on THR.
 
I have a 992 which has a conversion cylinder. It does 22 WMR and 22 LR. I replaced the open sights with a red dot, and I sanded the cylinder and frame to give it a near mirror finish look.
 
That is www.taurusarmed.net is anyone is interested.

Just for the record, I have over 41 Tauri in revolver and pistol guise. All of them work great and have no problems. Some go back to the middle 1980s.
 
I shot my son-in-law's 6" 357. The lock up was so poor it should have been spitting lead out the sides. Surprisingly it was very accurate with no spitting. I borrowed it for a CCW class with no issues. But I don't think I would want one unless it was properly tight.

I've always thought the SS PT92 was a good looker. They've been around a long time. Never got one into my mix of guns though.
 
I'm not insensitive to the experiences of others, and I think the old adage, "Where There's Smoke, There's Fire," is applicable. Caveat Emptor, and all that.

But I've owned a PT-99, two PT-92s, and have a Raging Bull in .44.

The only problem I had was with my first PT-92. I bought it used at Cabelas, and the guy at the counter did a conscientious job of hinting to me that the gun was traded in because the previous owner had problems with it.

After a brief examination, the "problem" was obvious: it needed a thorough cleaning. It was ever-loving filthy: oil, grease, lint, powder residue, etc. I had to wash my hands after examining it. I think the previous owner dipped it in used motor oil/transmission fluid for lube, and then tossed it into a rag-bag for storage.

Took it home, thoroughly cleaned it, and it ran like a champ. My BIL liked it so much I sold it to him. He takes it out shooting routinely, round count is probably 3,000+ by now.

I just got bored with my original PT-99, and traded it. My current -92 is a keeper.

I've only put around 400 or so rounds of .44 (spec. and mag.) through the RB so far, but some of it was Buffalo Bore. Heavy recoil, natch, but in a big, heavy gun with a ported barrel and a good shock absorbing grip. Get's lots of good comments at the range.

No problems out of the RB; some may qualify that with a "yet."
 
PT-22 has a nylon buffer pad in it. This is a one dollar part, that is not covered under warranty. Mine fell apart after cleaning one day. I called Taurus and ordered ten of them, at a dollar each, because shipping was over five bucks.

My credit card was charged upon placing the order.

After a month, I called, and was informed they were waiting for a shipment to come in.

After two months, I was told that they were still waiting.

After five months I was told that they had indeed received my buffers, but were too busy doing an inventory to send me my product.:scrutiny:

Six months later I received my buffers. My pistol sat, unfired, in a safe for six months because of a one dollar part.

This was about seven years ago.


About two years ago; The recoil lever on the left side of the pistol broke. I dreaded calling customer service again. This time a helpful young lady answered. I expected to be told that I would have to send in the pistol for repairs, since it involved dis-assembly. Nope. The young lady apologized for any inconvenience, and promised that I would have a new part in my mailbox within a week. It arrived two days after I hung up the phone.

Perhaps they have changed. I'm still not buying anything with their name on it.


By the way. That PT-22 is a great shooter. More accurate than it should be. Rarely ever has a feed or ejection problem.
 
I had a PT-22. It would not feed correctly. It would jam on every mag with many different rounds. It would even eject a live round rather than feeding it. Once the slide closed on a live round it was trying to eject, rather than feed. Bent it in half.

Not for me.
 
I have a bunch of Taurus's, all have been very good handguns, with exception to the only revolver of their's I own, a 608. that 608 is so horribly loose, and so far out of time, that I won't shoot it until I get it fixed. My Son bought it for me as a gift, and he knows nothing about wheel guns, so it's certainly not my fault that I own it.

But in all honesty, all my AL-ing Taurus's, PT99, PT111, 709's, and other's have been 100%. I have had to replace a couple small parts, but all I had to do was call Taurus, they shipped my parts to me within a week, no charge.

GS
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top