Absolutely not. It's the worst 2A infringement in history (at least the 34 act only taxed certain guns, not banned them from manufacture or import). It's a sad day down the slippery slope if the ban does not sunset for good. Write your critters folks. The bill is on the Senate floor NOW.
And wait a sec - if it costs anyone money, then it was either:
a) Done at their own peril, if they purchased the gun since 1994, when they knew or should have known that the law was set to sunset; or
b) If they owned the gun prior to 94, then it's inflation of value was all artificial anyway, and it's value will merely revert back to what it was, it's acquisition cost, and thus there's no real cost to the owner, only a "lost" opportunity cost created by an artificial price increase due to an unconstitutional law that never should have happened.
With all due respect, what the heck are you talking about? In my mind, the loss of freedom forever, and setting the precedent for a revolution that will destroy our great nation, is many thousands of times the magnitude of the loss of a few dollars that weren't really earned anyway. And if the loss is due a post-ban purchase, then that's the free market, and everyone was on notice that the ban had a built-in sunset provision. Your sentiments cause me much consternation and
--Dan