AR 9 using the Endomag conversion

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rangegod

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2002
Messages
258
Location
South FL.
This is a report on my observations and results using a standard AR lower with Endomag converted Pmags to assemble a 9 mm PCC.

I currently have four “Glock Mag” compatible 9 mm carbines. These include the KT Sub 2000, the Ruger PC Carbine, a Micro Roni with a dedicated Gen 3 Glock 19 and a 10.5” AR built on a PSA Glock LRBHO lower. Of these, the only one that I am not 100% happy with is the AR.

First, although it has been basically 100% reliable feeding ball ammo from Glock, KCI, Magpul and ETS mags, the LRBHO has only worked semi-reliably with the ETS mags. This is not a major problem as many 9 mm AR’s do not even feature a LRBHO. In addition, to prevent breaking the bolt catch, the bolt over travel must be reduced by either spacers in the buffer tube or a longer PCC specific buffer.

The second issue is of much greater concern. This is because I do not trust the gun to safely feed and fire HP ammo. Early on when working with this gun, I realized the design required the cartridge to make a large unsupported jump from the mag to the chamber. I found with HP’s it was easy for a bullet nose to catch the chamber edge and misfeed. It could also however, due to the heavy spring and buffer used in the PCC, drive the bullet deeply in to the case during the feeding cycle. This, as I learned from experience, can cause extreme over pressure and a case head failure, with many (trust me) unwanted results. One might say, just don’t use HP’s, but this seems like a terrible limitation on a defense carbine which can share your carry gun mags and ammo.

Enter the Endomag. Simply put the Endomag conversion allows you to convert your standard (Gen 2 or 3) Pmag to a 9 mm mag. Installation take only seconds and the mag’s original configuration can be restored just as fast. Just remove the mag floor plate, remove the spring & follower, then insert the Endomag conversion (one piece) and reinstall the floor plate. I ordered a 3 pack of the conversions a few week ago and last week received my new PSA SBA3 lower ($179.99 on sale!).

To test proof of concept, I mounted my 10.5” 9 mm upper on the new lower after installing a heaver buffer and buffer spring borrowed from my KS47. At the range this morning I ran 100 rounds of HP’s (50 Berry 115 gr TCHP, 50 Win 115 gr HP) and 45 ball rounds. I am happy to report 100% feeding and function. The Endomag provide an excellent feed ramp built into the longer Pmag body. They also provide very positive actuation of the AR bolt hold open catch (maybe better than the standard mags). Feeding was extremely smooth and positive. Loading the mags is also easy as the rounds can be pushed in from the top just like the standard 5.56 rounds.

Overall I think this is a very viable option for someone who wants to build a 9 mm PCC without the expense (and some of the drawbacks) of a dedicated pistol caliber lower.

Sorry this got a little long.
 
I have ordered a box of them and put one mag together, didn’t work with the upper that runs on Colt mags (with appropriate lower). Haven’t had time to play with them further though.

I do like the concept.
 
OP,
Thanks for a good review

Gunny,

Thanks to the link to your older post that I somehow missed I especially liked the clear photos that answered some of my questions about the ejector.

Everyone,

I posted questions about AR9s in a new thread to avoid drift

-kBob
 
I'd like to build a 9 mm ar but with ny i don't want a compliment one. Fixed mag would be a pain with 9mm. I'll get a ruger pcc when I have the money. The endomags look nice, I think I saw there lifetime warranty on them. Good luck with yours.
 
I'm running the endomag with an SBR. I built my upper on a cmmg guard bolt/barrel kit using a standard upper (no widened ejection port) It has run great for me thus far. I think I've had 1 misfeed in 500 rounds or so, but I've been running short stubby cast lead reduced power rnpf 124 grn handloads through it, so any jams could easily be from that. The cmmg radial delayed blowback system + endomag means I can use a standard lower with standard carbine buffer and spring and convert from 9mm, 6.5 grendel, 223, and 300aac with just an upper and mag swap. No fooling with springs and weights and mag blocks. And only 1 tax stamp!
 
I don't have one, but I believe the ejector is plastics. How does it last? I think I saw a YouTube that the ejector smashed only after a few mag full of shooting.
 
I don't have one, but I believe the ejector is plastics. How does it last? I think I saw a YouTube that the ejector smashed only after a few mag full of shooting.

Yeah not for me because of this reason, how long can plastic last as an ejector?

That and if you drop the mag with a chambered round it stays in the bolt even if cycling the charging handle as at that point there is no ejector, be careful not to forget that.
 
Last edited:
Yeah not for me because of this reason, how long can plastic last as an ejector?

That and if you drop the mag with a chambered round it stays in the bolt even if cycling the charging handle as at that point there is no ejector, be careful not to forget that.

Yet another reason to run the cmmg version. Cmmg has an ejector in the bolt and you don't the one on the endomag. Cmmg has liscenced the endomag and now sells it with the banshee instead of running a dedicated Glock lower.
 
I went the MEAN Arms EndoMag (I have 3) route so I could use standard Magpul AR15 magazines. I have the FM Products 8.5" Colt style upper paired with a standard PSA AR-15 lower and the fit between the two was precise. The function between the components has been flawless. I have not had to "tweak" one thing at this point; no failures to feed, fire or eject with 500 rounds through my setup. The 500 rounds are split between the three EndoMags; there is no noticeable wear on the ejectors at this point.

I load my own 9mm rounds so I shoot mixed brass and the setup runs very reliably with my loads; 124 grain FMJ from RMR; pushed by 5.0 grains CFE Pistol with the COL set a 1.130".
 
Endomag update and some observations. I put another 175 rounds (320 total) through my PSA 10.5”, 9 mm AR yesterday with zero issues. After my initial testing, I installed the Kaw Vally 7.5 oz. 9 mm length buffer and their extra power PCC/.308 buffer spring. This combination makes for very smooth operation by, slowing the action to increase dwell time and preventing violent ejection, while reducing bolt over travel to prevent damage to the bolt stop catch.

During the week since my initial post I have seen several comments from this, and other forum members and continued to research many online reviews. There seems to be a common theme to most of the problems encountered. This can basically be stated as “tolerance/clearance” problems.

Due to all the various upper, lowers and 9 mm bolts available on the market, there are literally hundreds of possible combinations of parts. This makes some tolerance conflict between parts inevitable. Most of these issues can be identified and/or resolved by following the manufactures instructions to test mag fit on closed bolt and checking (and maybe correcting) bolt/feed lip clearance on the closing bolt before installing the conversion kit. Instead I watched one on line reviewer prove Einstein’s definition of insanity by destroying three mags in succession, while expecting different results.

As to the plastic ejector, after 320 rounds (over 200 on one mag) I can see no signs of any ware. This was a surprise and force me to think about the engineering (something I don’t do much of since retirement). The ejector’s sole purpose is to initiate the pivot of the case off the extractor hook. This change in force vector and the velocity imparted by the bolt throws the case clear of the action. Although it is counter-intuitive, the ejector is in reality a relatively low stressed component. The amount of force require to initiate the case pivot off the extractor is minuscule and applied for only a millisecond. In addition, the mass of the empty 9 mm case striking the ejector is very low. This makes damage to the ejector during normal operation of little concern. Damage by tolerance conflict is another issue as discussed previously.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top