Best 9mm bullet for target?

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's also weight distribution, and consistency of the heel of the bullet that determines accuracy.
Sierra bullets are more accurate for a reason. Attention to details, quality materials, and near perfect execution of construction. Exactly why they're more expensive. You do get what you pay for.

Re: hollow points; By moving the mass of a bullet away from the center of axis, it improves the gyroscopic stability, and hence accuracy. Also by moving center of gravity rearward, it also enhances stability and therefore accuracy. It's the back of a bullet that steers it. If it wobbles, it'll veer off like a Greg Maddox curve ball. Only never the same way twice... Try playing with a child's top. Notice that it's wider towards the base (top). Small point on bottom to reduce contact surface drag... so it will spin longer, similar to hollow point rifle bullet, only also factoring in frontal drag from wind resistance.

Sierra has never pursued the pistol bullet self defense market, because thin jackets and soft lead cores make it easier to make an accurate bullet, but such tends to over expand and limit penetration. Not in vogue these days.
If I'm looking for an accurate jacketed pistol bullet, I use Sierra. Shot a couple of national records with them and won many matches.
For an accurate self defense load, controlled expansion; give me a Hornady XTP or Speer GoldDot.

I didn't imply that any of the characteristics of the 9mm bullets were unique to the 9mm. The .22lr does exactly the same thing. Ditto 7.62x51, only at dramatically longer distance. Just that it can happen before reaching a 50yd target with undesirable results.
When bullets go transonic, a multitude of things happen. Drag increases exponentially, also increasing wind drift, and instability. Meaning accuracy (actually precision, but also predictability of point of impact) becomes random or worse. And it's not just going transonic; witness the .38spl with 148gr wadcutters at 775fps m/v. Beyond 60yds, the bullets slow below the stability threshold for the typical 1/ 18-3/8" twist of a S&W revolver or 1/16" twist of a custom Douglas PPC match revolver barrel . Often even 50yd targets show wadcutters starting to "tip" or keyhole. By 85-100yds, the bullets are tumbling and won't reliably hit a silhouette target. But at 50yds, they'll shoot 24rds under 2".
Welcome to the wonderful and wacky world of pistol competition shooting.

Thanks for this great explanation, sir.
 
Most of my 9mm practice and match loads with 124s I keep subsonic. You can make 125 PF with a 124 (and of course a 147) and be subsonic if power factor matter to you.
What I find shoots best for me with a 124 is usually around 1030-1050fps.

You don't have this choice with factory ammo but as a reloader you do.

An important thing to remember is the MAX load is usually not the most accurate load, but on occasion it might be.
 
XTPs perform the best for me. I prefer 124 grain, but I have used 115s to good effect as well.

The price tends to add up quickly though. I use cheaper options for bulk reloading.

Back when they were cheap, the 124 grain XTPs ruled. I had great success with them in a number of guns. With the crazy prices since the Obama era, I'm searching far and wide. The HAP seems close and is about $0.15 each.

With some care in load development, you can usually find something to shoot in a given pistol for under $0.10 each. But the days seem to be gone where an affordable bullet could make every gun of that caliber sing sweet songs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top