Big Brother takes over MN high school

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hmmm...
The no hats thing is a good idea, but for other reasons mostly. It is distracting, but so are girls, low riders and exposed bellies. ;)

I went to a Catholic school and we all dressed the same. You know, it worked. The ID thing - well, like DL said, it will get them ready for the corporate/government jobs most of them will have.

I see this policy getting almost ZERO resistance. We spend 1/2 the state budget on schools and EXACTLY ONE bond referendum was voted down last cycle. Luckily it was my district. :p In Minnesota, we love to spend money on schools. We can't spend enough. Problem at school? Spend more money...
 
I asked that you not get your panties in a bunch. I guess that went unheeded.

Do you really think comments like this are going to help lead to an intelligent, civil discussion? Telling people what to think and how to act doesn't sit well. In this kind of forum it's trolling.

1) Public schools ARE government owned. If you send your kids there, expect them to follow GOVERNMENT rules.

They're publicly owned. THat means they belong to the taxpayers and are there for the taxpayer's benefit. Personally I don't think that accostoming children to being observed by cameras all day, and having their freedoms excessivly restricted is in the public interest.

As other poeple have mentioned all these rules about hats and zero tollerance rules about anything resembling a weapon didn't exist 20 years ago, and schools were considerably safer then. Our society is crushing the concept of personal responsibility. When I was in school it was safe for kids to carry knives on their belt, because none of them would consider using one as a weapon. Fights still happened, but not ones with serious or deadly injuries.

We keep getting more rules. However we keep failing at teaching young people to be personally responsible for their actions. It doesn't help that school administrators use zero tollerance policies because they don't want tohe responsibility of having to make reasonable judgements and taking steps to help correct bad behavior. Instead they just toos the student out of school for a while.

A computer can teach a child information often better than many teachers. The advantage of a teacher is that they can help build character in students, and engage the students in discussions which make the students not just learn the information, but to learn why those lessons are important.

2) Wearing hats is a big distraction. Hats are almost always related to gangs in one way or another. Hats cover eyes and block others' view of the teacher/board. They are sometimes just a pain in the neck as no one can stop laughing about the dork in the rooster tail hat. No hats, simple rule. My school doesn't allow sunglasses indoors either. Keeps the stoners sober.

Yea, I'm sure that kid wearing the red hat with a big number 8 on it is a member of the bloods or some crap like that.

If you can't see the student's eyes because their had is down in front of them, they obviously aren't paying attention. The problem isn't the hat, it's that the student isn't paying attention. You can tell that regardless of if they are wearing the hat or not.

If the hat is blocking the view of other students, or is overtly distracting, then having them remove it is reasonable. Banning all hats is just being lazy so you don't have to exercise any judgement.

3) Minors don't have the same rights. All the civil libertarians can scream and moan all they want, they still can't change the truth.

They are human beings, and they have rights. The have less rights because they are minors and they are placed in the care of adults. That means that the adults are taking on the responsibility to do what's in the student's best interests because the students are not considered to be mature enough to make good decisions.

Somewhere along the line we quit trying to infringe upon their rights as little as possible, and started treating students like inmates that cannot be trusted in the slightest.

4) IDs are a big pain. I know. I wear one all the time I'm in school, more to show an example to the kids since all the faculty recognizes each other.
But, you know what? I don't know all 1600 kids. If some punk from the rival school, or one of the local bangers who dropped out 2 years ago decides to drop in and cause trouble I can pick him out because he's the fool with no ID.

Only if he's really stupid, or you're paying really close attention. It's pretty easy to make something that looks like the school ID and wear it to get into the school. Unless you stop each kid to verify their ID people can still slip past if they want to cause trouble.

IDs may be necessisary in a really large school, and they may help in a few circumstances. The fact that we may need IDs in schools shows that we have some much more basic problems in society. Our society is suffering from moral decay that we all need to work to address.

Another benefit is I know who I'm dealing with when I have discipline issues in school. A few weeks ago, I busted 4 girls for drinking at the dance. I didn't know a one of them and had to confiscate ID's (and keys, since they were in the car). No IDs means everyone is named Jim Bob, AFAIK.

Since I assumed you called the police, all you needed to do was ask for a copy of the police report, which I suspect your administration would want anyway.
 
I was taught as a young'un that removing your hat indoors was a sign of respect to the master of the house. For school, this extended to respecting your teachers. My military experience has only reinforced this idea. It's all about respecting the organization and those that have come before you.
 
Public schools are to train kids to be used to zero privacy, abrogated rights, irrational and arbitrary rules, and total survailence. Once kids who have adapted to said conditions graduate from school are they going to say, "Hurray, I'm 18 now I have privacy, 4th amendment protections, and the right to freedom of expression." or are they going to say, "Help protect me from people with knives by putting security cameras on every corner and having random frisks to catch people with weapons. (Don't call this paranoid stuff, its already occuring in London and Sydney.)

That about sums it up, unfortuneately.

Home schooling, outstanding idea. One which will probably be crushed by the statists and the NEA. Or at least they will try. I allways love the arguments about kids that are home schooled not learning 'social skills'. You know, stuff like
wearing your pants around your ankles, and smoking meth ;) 'Social Skills'.
 
Do you really think comments like this are going to help lead to an intelligent, civil discussion? Telling people what to think and how to act doesn't sit well. In this kind of forum it's trolling.

Then I guess I'm a troll. At least this troll is right.

Personally I don't think that accostoming children to being observed by cameras all day, and having their freedoms excessivly restricted is in the public interest.
Not in the public's best interest?!? What would you know? Have you been in an inner city school in the last 5 years? If we DON'T watch them, will we be accountable for all the drug deals, sex in the halls, murders, gangbanging, etc.? Remember, they're YOUR kids. I didn't raise them to be like this. I just try to keep them alive and educated. At a 1:40 ratio, we NEED cameras to watch them all.
As other poeple have mentioned all these rules about hats and zero tollerance rules about anything resembling a weapon didn't exist 20 years ago, and schools were considerably safer then.
A good comment on the decline of the family. I can only play the cards I'm dealt. I'm sure in Beaver Cleaver's days everything was rosy. We ain't in Kansas anymore.
Instead they just toos the student out of school for a while.
While I can't answer to such a blanket statement, I will say that eliminating the one bad egg and allowing the 20+ in my class to be able to learn is worth the loss.

A computer can teach a child information often better than many teachers.
False statement. I'd like to see the research on that one.
Yea, I'm sure that kid wearing the red hat with a big number 8 on it is a member of the bloods or some crap like that.
You must live in a really whitebread society if you don't understand the connections between shoes, jackets, hats, jerseys and GANGS. Almost everything is gang-related nowadays. Keeping it out is everyone's concern.
Banning all hats is just being lazy so you don't have to exercise any judgement.
Easy to say. Try saying it to 3 students each class, 4-7 times per day, 180 days per year. On the low end, that's over 2100 times that I have to ask a student to remove their hat. Since their manners are not what you think they are, I have to cajole, argue, and often take disciplinary steps to have that hat removed in my class. Sure, if everyone wore a non-offensive, non-sexually explicit, non-gang related hat in my class, the rule would have never come into being. The truth of the matter is--we have the rule for good reasons.
Somewhere along the line we quit trying to infringe upon their rights as little as possible, and started treating students like inmates that cannot be trusted in the slightest.
I agree. However, when they act like inmates and commit crimes when not under constant adult surveillance, what would you have us do?
Only if he's really stupid, or you're paying really close attention
Aren't most criminals? And, for the most part, I am.
The fact that we may need IDs in schools shows that we have some much more basic problems in society. Our society is suffering from moral decay that we all need to work to address.
Amen! And the reform starts at home with the family, something which many of my kids don't even have.
Since I assumed you called the police, all you needed to do was ask for a copy of the police report, which I suspect your administration would want anyway.
You assumed wrong.
 
Goet,

You make many very good points.

In some schools it's possible that such measures are necessisary. I wish there were a better solution, obviously you wish there were too.

You must live in a really whitebread society if you don't understand the connections between shoes, jackets, hats, jerseys and GANGS. Almost everything is gang-related nowadays. Keeping it out is everyone's concern.

Yes, for the most part I do. However, zero tollerance and constant survailance aren't limited to the inner city schools. There are many, many examples of how suburban schools that don't have the level of problems that inner city schools have taking the same approaches.

Rather than properly addressing discipline problems they have zero tolerance policies and don't bother to consider intent or the circimstances around incidents.

There's definatley been a decline in our society in the realm of respect. However, it doesn't halp matters when the authority figures that students deal with on a regular basis aren't willing to take the time to handle discipline properly and justly.

Teaching is a difficult job. It's also an extremely important job. Good teachers often significantly change student's lives for the better.

Of course it's hard to do much when the students come to you with little concept of discipline or respect. I think that the decline of the family and decline of our youth may very well be the biggest problem America faces right now. It's also likely the hardest to solve.

You seem to be in a bad situation in the school in which you work. I guess all I can ask is that you do what you can. It's important work.
 
"a 21-year-old man entered the school during the morning rush with a knife, which some students thought was a gun."

What the heck are they teaching these kids? Don't these kids watch hollywood movies for crying out loud?? "It looked dangerous so I assumed it was a gun." Sheesh.
 
A few weeks ago, I busted 4 girls for drinking at the dance. I didn't know a one of them and had to confiscate ID's (and keys, since they were in the car).
Let me get this straight - they were in a car, you didn't know them, so they probably didn't know you either . . . and yet they just handed over their IDs and keys to you when you asked for them?

I'm certainly not going to defend teen drinking, especially if coupled with teen driving, but it seems that teens today are more . . . compliant . . . than they were in my day.
 
No offense to Armoredman or others intended, but Goet, you aren't a teacher, you are a prison guard. The conditions you describe, gangs, violence, etc. won't be fixed by treating everyone like prisoners, but I'll concede that treating little monsters like princes won't work either.

atek3
 
Let me get this straight - they were in a car, you didn't know them, so they probably didn't know you either . . . and yet they just handed over their IDs and keys to you when you asked for them?

They had a choice and they made the best decision. Besides, you're assuming, probably incorrectly. Who's to know they didn't know me as "atoritay". I just didn't know them.

I would also hope that teenaged girls on school property are VERY willing to follow the instructions of authority. Not being "compliant" would have landed them in the pokey for a few hours.



Goet, you aren't a teacher, you are a prison guard.

Sometimes it feels that way. Fortunately, the few that are bad can easily be removed if the community will allow it. We're trying. Then I can take the 60% effort spent on classroom management and turn it into teaching time. I really have a lot of smart kids in my classes. They just often get stifled by the loudmouths and punks.
 
Sounds like the school district does not have any practical ideas to stem the problem, so they implemented some superficial rules to make it look like they are doing something.

Kinda reminds me of the 1994 AWB. Didn't accomplish anything, but made a few folks feel good.
 
To a boy with a hammer, everything looks like a nail. To anything but a competent bureaucrat, everything looks like an opportunity for a regulation.

There's some real advantages to the ID badges, though. The combination of an ID badge, a badge scanner, and a password can make it more difficult for one student to use another's computer account. (Kids are almost as sloppy about password security as mid-level corporate types.)

And it does make it easier, in the overly large schools, for teachers and administrators to sort out those who belong there from those who don't.

Each to his own; I'm not particularly in favor of promiscuous use of ID cards, but I don't see a lot of harm in ID cards for students.

The hat stuff, though, is just plain silly. Not wearing hats in class? Fine -- but in Minnesota, students with two brain cells to click together will be wearing headgear to school during the cold months, and writing a rule that forbids that is just plain braindamaged.
 
I'm pretty sure the classrooms are somewhere above -20 F, thus negating their need indoors.
 
Hmmmm. ID cards bad, cameras bad......

I suppose all of the critics here volunteer a couple weeks in their local schools, attend school board meetings, are involved in PTO/PTA, assist in after- and before school activities, support bond issues, know the names of all your kids's school friends? Oh, sorry, forgot - you are home-schooling, so the problems are'nt really anything you really know much about then, are they? I also forgot how easy it is to point fingers instead of working at a solution.

I was taught not to wear a hat indoors - since when did it become a civil liberties issue?

Teachers Lead the Way
 
We(have to include the wife in this) have 6 children and we homeschooled.

Our oldest is a civil engineer and our youngest is the computer wizard for the school district. The in-betweens are also successfull breadwinners and contributors to society.

From what I gleened from all of this is that the students were wearing hats in class. Well from home training and respect they should know better than that. When you wear a hat and are entering a persons home ,classroom, office, etc. you remove such headgear.

Sounds like some lack of respect and over-reaction taking place here.

Adult/parental discipline and supervision goes a long ways.;)
 
From the front lines.

A rare post from the Ten Dollar Man who is only too familiar with the school district in question. Regarding the following....

Have you been in an inner city school in the last 5 years? If we DON'T watch them, will we be accountable for all the drug deals, sex in the halls, murders, gangbanging, etc.?


Eden Prairie H.S. could hardly be further from an inner city school. Unless inner city schools are able to successfully get the voters to approve funding for an espresso bar. (Now called a coffee shop...
lunch )

They are looking for another $20 million or so this fall for more 'technology' improvements. Should be able to afford a few measly cameras.
 
One important point:

* Eden Prairie, with its ID badges and zillion cameras, IS a whitebread suburb.


Goet, you are dead wrong. You acknowledge that it is one bad apple per 20 students that spoils the educational experience. Then you advocate treating ALL of the students like inmates.

That's exactly what the gun banners advocate. One gun in 5,000 may be misused -- so let's ban them all.

If you're a teacher, you must know that producing graduates that can think for themselves, that know right from wrong, and know how to live in a free society is a bit more important than any inconvenience you may experience in maintaining order in your classroom.

Good teachers set classroom rules at the beginning of the year. Students that do not follow those rules get sent to the principal. After a while, even the thickest of high schoolers figure out what behavior is and is not tolerated.

Oh, and I do know a lot about both inner-city and suburban schools. I spent 12 years in school, personally.

Oh, yeah, and my wife is a teacher.

My sister, too.

Yup, my mom as well.
 
Matt, the "Good teachers set classroom rules at the beginning of the year. Students that do not follow those rules get sent to the principal. After a while, even the thickest of high schoolers figure out what behavior is and is not tolerated." bit sounds good, but it doesn't jibe with the reality I've heard from some teachers in some schools.

My views are affected by news items about assaults on teachers in classrooms, or a failure of a principal's office to back up a teacher when the teacher tries to maintain order in the classroom. Also, by teachers' stories of hallway or restroom behavior involving drugs and sex. I dunno. It all seems endless and futile.

The arrogance of teeny-bopper twits and the "Me! Me! Me!" BS so common nowadays would not have been tolerated for one moment when I was in school. We were there to learn math and English and all that stuff, not worry about "rights". (We didn't know we had any, so we didn't miss them. The teachers didn't act as though we needed rights; they were themselves mostly fair and courteous.)

I guess I blame parents and the atmosphere of a PC permissive society and the legal system which seems to put "rights" above education.

Face it: How can any system which thinks you can "give" respect or "allow" or "encourage" self-esteem be worth a hoot? When the concept of facing challenges and earning respect and building one's own self-esteem is out the window, is there any hope?

In the meantime, the taxpayer foots the bill for badges and cameras and security guards.

Art
 
I drove a school bus for one school year, I also helped maintain them as well. I drove for a yuppie mostly white low crime suburb area.

As a bus driver I had a lot of responsability since I had to make the kids go to school and make them get off at the proper stop. I had to control them while on the bus as well. Of course this never worked well since I had little to threaten the kids with. I could send them to detention, most of their buddies were there already. I could make the principal ride the bus, he had little to threaten the kids with. It opened my eyes to the current public school system and made me realize how messed up things are.

Oh, and teachers have the same trouble with what to threaten kids with. I had one kid who made sure he got suspended before a long vacation so he could spend more time with some friends who went to another school with different days off.

My biggest reason for being against id badges, cameras, armed gaurds, and all the other stuff is that it costs money.

What the school system needs is parents who raise a kid properly and then the school system can educated them into a well rounded person.

I know there are problem areas and all sorts of odd situtations. While everything can not be dealt with in the old ways, there sure are better ways to do things than mandatory drug testing, ids, cameras, metal detectors, and all the other expensive "solutions" that generally have not solved the problem.

Oh, my hat comment about wearing them outside being against the rules came about because I figured the school would want cameras in the bus drop off and parking lots and everywhere. Yeah it gets cold, but when has common sense been something the school folks were afraid to make against the rules?
 
You must live in a really whitebread society if you don't understand the connections between shoes, jackets, hats, jerseys and GANGS. Almost everything is gang-related nowadays. Keeping it out is everyone's concern.

So, by logical extension, we should ban not only hats, but also shoes, jackets, and jerseys. Is there any article of clothing that couldn't be a gang symbol? Maybe they should all just go to class naked? :what: Nah, that probably wouldn't work.

Yes, I know that's sort of the argument for uniforms. Uniformity supposedly eliminates the self-expression and social differentiation of personal clothing choices. Does it really work? It may abate them. But I've heard from former students of schools with uniforms, that the creative mind of the motivated student always finds a way to sneak in some self-expression, even within the narrow boundaries of a uniform dress code.

For the record, I think it's reasonable to make the kiddies doff their hats in the classrooms at least, out of respect to the teacher. But the fact that a particular hat might be a gang symbol doesn't seem like a compelling argument for banning all hats everywhere in and around schools.

The school's regulation seems quite Orwellian. (Yes, I know that word gets used a lot, but only because it's so applicable these days.) The whole "no hats allowed because we need to see their faces at all times on the 125 cameras" thing seems unreasonably intrusive. Are they also going to require that no one slouch and look at the floor, or make a habit of scratching their forehead while walking within view of the cameras? It's an unreasonable search.

Highly recommended reading on the subject of public school tyranny, including Zero Tolerance policies: ZeroIntelligence.net

-twency

________________
"The parent who complained, Karen Young, doesn't want fish-shaped toy guns in her house because she accidentally shot an ex-boyfriend one time when the gun she was beating him with went off."
 
Mien Gott - if someone had told me in high school, Which was 19 years ago, that I could not wear a HAT, I would have laughed in thier face and walked on! What crap! Our son is going to a private religous school.

I SERIOUSLY doubt that any religious private school allows hats to be worn within its walls.

I spend 12 years in Catholic school and a friend spent 16 in a pentecostal school. I bought my first hat EVER when i turned 19. He had one for little league and let me assure you it never even made it onto school property. To this day i can feel the sharp edge of a ruler should i venture indoors with one on.

The very idea that some kind of "junior liberty" exists at private school is silly. The reason private schools turn out such good kids is because of DISCIPLINE. And part of that is not being allowed to wear hats and not tollerating any kind of out-of-line behavior. The reason Public Schools are failing isnt because of TOO MANY rules. It's because of too few.
 
This high school sounds just like the one I attended on the North side of Indianapolis. When I graduated in 1998 we had the following "security" measures...

*Photo ID which we were required to provide whenever requested by faculty. It was also used to check out books from the school library.

*Hundreds of security cameras both inside and outside. They were in every hallway intersection and on every corner of the building.

*24 hour armed security patrol. They roamed the halls intimidating students to be in class on time. One of their primary functions was to check incoming cars during school hours. I guess they were looking for students coming in late.:confused:

*A holding cell used to detain and interrogate the tardy students.


As students, we took all of these things in stride. I realized quite early on that I was not in a position to change the Big Brother mentality of my school. So I learned how to sneak around the restrictions and do as I pleased. I turned out alright. :scrutiny:

Needless to say, whenever I have children, I'll make it a point to know whether or not they'll be subjected to such monitoring and control in whatever school I send them to.
 
But the fact that a particular hat might be a gang symbol doesn't seem like a compelling argument for banning all hats everywhere in and around schools.

Maybe not to you. But, then again, you don't have to spend the whole day with kids raised by other people.

Look at the outcry on this board! Imagine dealing with the same outcry accompanied with LESS courtesy and discipline--and from minors with LESS rights to boot.

What the school system needs is parents who raise a kid properly and then the school system can educated them into a well rounded person.

I guess I blame parents and the atmosphere of a PC permissive society and the legal system which seems to put "rights" above education.

Wise words.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top