OP
OP
oldbear
Member
akv3g4n
Thank you. Yours was the only response, so far, that attempted to answer my question.
Thank you. Yours was the only response, so far, that attempted to answer my question.
Bill mahar's recent comments
- Thread starter oldbear
- Start date
- Status
jerkface11
Member
Yeah justinj that would be both major parties.
Arkansas Paul
Member
It's about freakin time somebody got it. I thought I was the only one here.
zxcvbob
Member
For the most part they don't want you to have guns either, they just let the D's carry the ball on that one. Both have the same end game, just different priorities for how we get there.
Bill Maher says the 2nd amendment is "bs" but has admitted he owns a gun for protection. If the 2nd amendment is such "bs," perhaps he should consider selling his gun. He would never do that. Nor would he put a sign in his yard that says, "This house is proudly gun free." Similar to some vocal, anti-gun types, Maher owns guns and some also have armed bodyguards to protect them.
Thus the story can be summed up as telling others to disarm, while keeps firearms for themselves and having armed bodyguards. They can have it, you should not. Never listen to this narrative.
Thus the story can be summed up as telling others to disarm, while keeps firearms for themselves and having armed bodyguards. They can have it, you should not. Never listen to this narrative.
SharpsDressedMan
member
"Boy i would love to point out which party thinks its the governments role to tell people who they can marry, what to do with their bodies, forces terminal patients who wish to choose their own fate to suffer needlessly, throws people in prison for drug violations that hurt nobody else, violate seperation of chruch and state, condone torture, tell people how they can have sex and now even how to wear pants but i won't."
Yeah! Let's leave any moral integrity and any responsibility to a higher authority out of government! We can't legislate morality, so let's just do as we please. Heck, if murder wasn't against the law, I know some people who would be GONE! Who is ANYONE to tell anyone ELSE how to live? In God we no longer trust!
Yeah! Let's leave any moral integrity and any responsibility to a higher authority out of government! We can't legislate morality, so let's just do as we please. Heck, if murder wasn't against the law, I know some people who would be GONE! Who is ANYONE to tell anyone ELSE how to live? In God we no longer trust!
Hopkins
Member
If Bill Maher is a libertarian his $1 million dollar donation to the Obama campaign pretty well sums up his true confusion.
JustinJ said:
I think that it's commonly held that if someone says that they are "not a proud Prius owner" or "not a proud banker", that it means that it is something that they wish to hide or are otherwise ashamed of. Bill saying that he is not a proud gun owner incinuates that he wants to distance himself from us and wants nothing to do with ensuring that his right to bear arms stays in place.
lilguy
Member
Hello! Bill Mahar is an attention grabbing entertainer. That's all, no threat.
USAF_Vet
Member
Is this the same Bill Maher who bashes conservatives for their "war on women" and then turns around and calls Sarah Palin a C***? Same guy?
Yeah, I care what he thinks or says.
A gun is a tool, and so is bill maher.
Yeah, I care what he thinks or says.
A gun is a tool, and so is bill maher.
Bianchi?
Member
Yeah! Let's leave any moral integrity and any responsibility to a higher authority out of government! We can't legislate morality, so let's just do as we please. Heck, if murder wasn't against the law, I know some people who would be GONE! Who is ANYONE to tell anyone ELSE how to live? In God we no longer trust!
My rights end where your rights begin. You killing me infringes (severely) on my right to life. Me smoking marijuana in no way infringes on your rights.
RetiredUSNChief
Member
A couple of items here:
1. He's an "entertainer". This is what he does for a living...making radical statements about his beliefs (and the beliefs of others) which draws a crowd and makes him popular.
2. At least he isn't pussy-footing around the subject with his stand on this issue. We know EXACTLY where he stands on this, and for that I'm very grateful. There are still far too many politician about which we cannot say this, one way or the other. Those are every bit as dangerous, if not more so, than those whom we know to be against the RKBA.
I find the following to be an interesting quote from the link:
"Why can’t they say about guns what the Democrats said about abortion — it should be safe, legal and rare.”" I've never come across any Democrat who ever said abortion should be "rare".
1. He's an "entertainer". This is what he does for a living...making radical statements about his beliefs (and the beliefs of others) which draws a crowd and makes him popular.
2. At least he isn't pussy-footing around the subject with his stand on this issue. We know EXACTLY where he stands on this, and for that I'm very grateful. There are still far too many politician about which we cannot say this, one way or the other. Those are every bit as dangerous, if not more so, than those whom we know to be against the RKBA.
I find the following to be an interesting quote from the link:
"Why can’t they say about guns what the Democrats said about abortion — it should be safe, legal and rare.”" I've never come across any Democrat who ever said abortion should be "rare".
Maher describes himself as a libertarian, but his expressed opinions bear no resemblance to actual libertarianism.
ive watched every single bill maher in the past 5 years and i continue to do so. he DOES own guns for self defense. he does not say things to be controversial, i actually think most of what he says is pretty un-contraversial... hes more "right" than a lot of people might believe because of the way hes portrayed on many right wing "news" stations. u cant find a show that brings a group of people on like that and talk about current issues. it doesnt exist. we happen to be learned at very little things as individuals.. gun legislation and guns in general is not everyones strong point..
if i get someone who doesnt consume or know anything about cannabis to start legislating on it, you'll get huge messes like the war on drugs and all that madness.. many of you wouldnt be able to legislate or have a proper opinion about a lot of things.... i blame our education systems that are so narrow-minded and subjective about everything
if i get someone who doesnt consume or know anything about cannabis to start legislating on it, you'll get huge messes like the war on drugs and all that madness.. many of you wouldnt be able to legislate or have a proper opinion about a lot of things.... i blame our education systems that are so narrow-minded and subjective about everything
ApacheCoTodd
member
Like so many others, he makes a living by inciting animosity through artificial controversy.
I prefer to not add to his fame or recognition and hope after enough others do the same he will fade into the irrelevance he so richly deserves.
He's just the current generations more vulgar, less intelligent Dick Cavet.
Or, the guy Jon Stewart wishes he could be but still make the same money.
I prefer to not add to his fame or recognition and hope after enough others do the same he will fade into the irrelevance he so richly deserves.
He's just the current generations more vulgar, less intelligent Dick Cavet.
Or, the guy Jon Stewart wishes he could be but still make the same money.
Tomcat47
Member
Good Point!
And a Gun is a Useful Tool.........
Bill Maher is a Useless Tool..........
Pretty Much Sums It Up!
mljdeckard
Member
He's a Libertarian who donated money to the Obama campaign.
I'll see your Bill Maher and raise you one Penn Jillette.
I'll see your Bill Maher and raise you one Penn Jillette.
I'd love to point out which side wants to blame every gun owner for what a very small portion of the population does and calls you a heartless monster if you disagree.
I'd like to point out which side stayed completely silent on their gun control stance until the election was over.
I'd like to point out which side blames guns themselves for gang violence that large cities are plagued with when they let criminals out constantly in the revolving door system in the states where they reside.
I'd like to point out which group thinks that 50% of the population that actually works should support the other half that doesn't.
I'd like to point out the side that screams about 30,000 gun related deaths (half of which are suicide) per year but is oddly silent about the fact that over a million human beings are aborted every year.
Last but not least, I'd love to point out which side has used the deaths of 20 school kids to advance a 20+ year old agenda that would not have prevented said tragedy.
Both sides are guilty of being ignorant and insensitive. Neither side is always right. This is a gun forum though and for me, gun rights trump all the other BS, which is one of the only reasons I refuse to vote for a certain side, who has totally alienated me and tons of other pro gun voters.
- Status
Similar threads
