oldbear
Member
akv3g4n
Thank you. Yours was the only response, so far, that attempted to answer my question.
Thank you. Yours was the only response, so far, that attempted to answer my question.
Boy i would love to point out which party thinks its the governments role to tell people who they can marry, what to do with their bodies, forces terminal patients who wish to choose their own fate to suffer needlessly, throws people in prison for drug violations that hurt nobody else, violate seperation of chruch and state, condone torture, tell people how they can have sex and now even how to wear pants but i won't.
For the most part they don't want you to have guns either, they just let the D's carry the ball on that one. Both have the same end game, just different priorities for how we get there.Boy i would love to point out which party thinks its the governments role to tell people who they can marry, what to do with their bodies, forces terminal patients who wish to choose their own fate to suffer needlessly, throws people in prison for drug violations that hurt nobody else, violate seperation of chruch and state, condone torture, tell people how they can have sex and now even how to wear pants but i won't.
JustinJ said:Are you proud of typing right now as you are expressing your first amendment right? Proud to be breathing per your right to life? Maybe its a different definition of the word "proud" but not being proud does not equate to being ashamed. I just believe pride should be reserved to exceptional or meaningful accomplishments. For example, one should be proud of their work to preserve gun rights but not of the simple act of buying a gun. One can even be proud of an impressive gun collection because of the effort that went into amassing it but i don't understand being proud of doing something as simple as buying a gun or any other tool.
Yeah! Let's leave any moral integrity and any responsibility to a higher authority out of government! We can't legislate morality, so let's just do as we please. Heck, if murder wasn't against the law, I know some people who would be GONE! Who is ANYONE to tell anyone ELSE how to live? In God we no longer trust!
He is a Libertarian. The big government type so long as it is the one stomping on anothers rights.
His brand of Libertarianism is what is killing the 3rd party movement. There isn't a tent big enough for me to get under it with him.
A gun is a tool, and so is bill maher.
I'd love to point out which side wants to blame every gun owner for what a very small portion of the population does and calls you a heartless monster if you disagree.Boy i would love to point out which party thinks its the governments role to tell people who they can marry, what to do with their bodies, forces terminal patients who wish to choose their own fate to suffer needlessly, throws people in prison for drug violations that hurt nobody else, violate seperation of chruch and state, condone torture, tell people how they can have sex and now even how to wear pants but i won't.