You can get a CCW any where if your job is to protect the rich and power full and their money.
Standard operating policy for armored car crews is to do this (not the look tough part trying to prove something, just the carry in hand while escorting the bucks). I have to admit I have never seen one take a safety off, maybe if only because I have never seen anyone carry a 1911 or single action pistol on one of these jobs. Usually they carry double action semi-autos or revolvers that do not routinely have a safety engaged. It is rather ridiculous that it is okay in NYC for a security guard to safeguard the pennies with pistol in hand, but not okay for the citizen to even own a gun and carry it for self protection. Then agagin isn't that how it always is for the rich and moronic.Guy was walking like a tough guy trying to prove something.
Tecumseh said:Why not then start your own security company with your friends in California?
In Texas a Personal Protective Officer license is required. You can get it without being licensed for other security work. However your licenses has to be carried by a company, you can't carry it yourself. This means you have to start your own corporation if you don't want to work for someone else, which isn't a bad way to distance yourself from liability. You are allowed to then carry anywhere in the state of Texas so long as an assignment.
unny you asked... just last year i used to work at 223 Broadway near City Hall, Manhattan. I'm standing outside smoking, and this armored truck pulls over. Two security guards come out, grab some bags, and start walking. One of them, upholsters the weapon, takes the friggin safety off, and walks with gun in one hand, and bag in the other across the street. And I thought to myself... so it's ok to hold a gun in your hand in public if you're defending somebody else's money, but not if it's your life. God I hate that place. FL is so much better.
Anyways, the two guys went inside a bank and I can only assume one of them holstered the handgun once inside. But it really disturbed me. Guy was walking like a tough guy trying to prove something. Still sends chills down my spine when i think about that moment.
It is sickening that the use of a firearm is acceptable to defend a 3rd parties assets but not a 1st person's rights. Money money money