Absolutely not.
I expect the highest level of professionalism from sworn police officers. Period. At all times. No exceptions, ESPECIALLY in tactical cases where they are deployed with a specific task.
This slimebag starts off by disarming a policeman and killing him and his dog with his own gun. Then he wounds another officer. Who is he? Billy the kid? Tarzan? Carlos Hathcox? Arnold Schwartznegger? No. He's a junked-out crackhead with a stolen pistol on ground he doesn't know with no backup. He's one layer thick. I bet he didn't have a cellphone or a waterbottle, much less a plan.
Then a professional SWAT team tracks him 24 hours and shoots him 68 times out of 110 rounds?
Tell me, when does the professionalism kick in?
Any special reason we are paying and training folks do do what any drunken lynch mob could pull off without crossing the threads on their bottle of vino?
I don't care if someone scalps the pope. If we, as citizens, send out the police to get him, I expect him back intact for trial or professionally killed by an expert if he refuses, not shot to rags by a bunch of badged avengers.
I'd doubt the story of a team that came in with the facts as they stand now. Is this their training? Is this some tactic taught in SWAT school?
Exactly as I said, I would have their badges and guns on my desk if I was the chief, not be bragging about how much ammo they shot.
Police departments were formed to be professionals. I fully expect folks who put on the badge and swear to uphold the LAW to BE the professionals they swore to BE at all times and under all conditions, no excuses.
This was a ragged unprofessional business from start to end.