Many THR members carry while at home, some in OC holsters and some concealed, especially in pockets. Here's a thought- when you CC around the house, do you make sure to have your CHP/CCP/CCL/CWP and ID (e.g. drivers license) also with you at all times?
I ask this because of the what-if: What if you have reason to go outside, on the porch, in the yard, or even step off the property, and the fact that you are carrying becomes an issue?
That what-if was prompted by the posting about "knock & talk" on VCDL, quoted below.
If a LEO comes to the door, and you choose not to invite the LEO inside, but instead choose to converse on the porch or in the yard, what happens if the LEO becomes aware of your CC handgun?
Obviously, if you are OC, then you should not even step out of your door unless you are in a a state and locality with OC-friendly laws.
Craig
Link to
http://www.vcdl.org/static/index.html
and then about 1/3 down the page click on the link to
07/29/08 - VCDL Update 7/29/08 - Part 1
===
6. Beware of "knock & talk" tactic by police to gain entry
**************************************************
This "Knock and Talk" tactic is exactly what came up yesterday at the
'Heller' Victory Party. Knock and Talk can be incredibly dangerous in
the 4th (mid-Atlantic) and 5th (TX, LA, & MS) circuits, that allow
this. It's too easy for LEOs to convert a K&T into an Exigent
Circumstance warrantless search & seizure. Or consent exception. Or
'plain view' exception. Or community caretaker exception. And so on.
Gun owners are especially vulnerable. A VCDL member asked Senator
Cuccinelli what he thought about all this; he didn't really have an
answer.
See U.S. v. Jones, 239 F.3d 716 (5th Cir. 2001):
http://tinyurl.com/5td85e
[SNIP]
Federal courts have recognized the "knock and talk" strategy as a
reasonable investigative tool when officers seek to gain an occupant's =
consent to search or when officers reasonably suspect criminal
activity. This investigative tactic is not inherently unreasonable.
--
=======
I ask this because of the what-if: What if you have reason to go outside, on the porch, in the yard, or even step off the property, and the fact that you are carrying becomes an issue?
That what-if was prompted by the posting about "knock & talk" on VCDL, quoted below.
If a LEO comes to the door, and you choose not to invite the LEO inside, but instead choose to converse on the porch or in the yard, what happens if the LEO becomes aware of your CC handgun?
Obviously, if you are OC, then you should not even step out of your door unless you are in a a state and locality with OC-friendly laws.
Craig
Link to
http://www.vcdl.org/static/index.html
and then about 1/3 down the page click on the link to
07/29/08 - VCDL Update 7/29/08 - Part 1
===
6. Beware of "knock & talk" tactic by police to gain entry
**************************************************
This "Knock and Talk" tactic is exactly what came up yesterday at the
'Heller' Victory Party. Knock and Talk can be incredibly dangerous in
the 4th (mid-Atlantic) and 5th (TX, LA, & MS) circuits, that allow
this. It's too easy for LEOs to convert a K&T into an Exigent
Circumstance warrantless search & seizure. Or consent exception. Or
'plain view' exception. Or community caretaker exception. And so on.
Gun owners are especially vulnerable. A VCDL member asked Senator
Cuccinelli what he thought about all this; he didn't really have an
answer.
See U.S. v. Jones, 239 F.3d 716 (5th Cir. 2001):
http://tinyurl.com/5td85e
[SNIP]
Federal courts have recognized the "knock and talk" strategy as a
reasonable investigative tool when officers seek to gain an occupant's =
consent to search or when officers reasonably suspect criminal
activity. This investigative tactic is not inherently unreasonable.
--
=======
Last edited: