Change of feature in Centerpoint scopes sold at Walmart...good, bad or no consequence?

Status
Not open for further replies.
are you trying to tell me that a 500.00 leupold scope is only worth 50.00? if so is a 1500.00 nightforce only worth 150.00 and the high end scopes also only worth one tenth of what they sell for? i only speak of my hunting expearence of over 50 years and never haveing a hunt ruined because of a defective scope. buy what you want and good luck with it. eastbank.
might have exaggerated a bit but not much. I say expensive scopes way overpriced. if I go on a hunt somewhere I take 2 rifles one as a spare if you climb rocks bang against one or drop it scopes easily gets bent even if you paid 5K for it
 
no crickets here. very easy to explain leupold policy. they sell their scopes for 10 times what they are worth to finance their warranty. also ripping off the US govt with their $5000 scopes helps a lot. nothing is free you pay for all the coverage when you buy the scope. very easy to understand. how can they stay in business with this "generous" policy unless it is paid for by purchasing the scope? for $89 I paid still get lifetime warranty but who cares being I did not pay $500 for the same scope so I could trade it in 30 years from now. scopes will be obsolete 30 years from now anyway in their current form
^This is a bad argument. I still use my grandfathers Leupold M8 scout scope thats been mounted on a DeerSlayer since the 70's and leupold will still back it up. Thats a good company. Theres a reason why things cost what they do and its not always a scam. Now theres nothing wrong obviously if you like centerpoint. Use them enjoy and defend them if needs be. But its gonna be tough to convince anyone Leupold is basically scamming their customer base.
 
Last edited:
....
the reason they give you a "free" repair and all that is because they charge 3 times as much for the scope and the repairs are figured in. nothing is free. fenwick rods etc is all the same you but one rod but pay for 3 so when it breaks you get another that you paid for lol. many companies do the same thing
Have you ever used a fenwick? So in you estimation is any "top" company in the sporting good world worth paying for?
 
^This is a bad argument. I still use my grandfathers Leupold M8 scout scope thats been mounted on a DeerSlayer since the 70's and leupold will still back it up. Thats a good company. Theres a reason why things cost what they do and its not always a scam. Now theres nothing wrong obviously if you like centerpoint. Use them enjoy and defend them if needs be. But its gonna be tough to convince anyone Leupold is basically scamming their customer base.
OK tell me how leupold can back up a 40 year old scope and stay in business without charging for all the warranty when the scopes are sold. it is not a scam it is a way to do business
^This is a bad argument. I still use my grandfathers Leupold M8 scout scope thats been mounted on a DeerSlayer since the 70's and leupold will still back it up. Thats a good company. Theres a reason why things cost what they do and its not always a scam. Now theres nothing wrong obviously if you like centerpoint. Use them enjoy and defend them if needs be. But its gonna be tough to convince anyone Leupold is basically scamming their customer base.
ok tell me how they can stay in business if you send a scope back to them that was $100 40 years ago and fix it at todays rate or send you a new one? only way is to charge enough on new scopes to cover repairs. I paid $89 for the CP but did not pay enough to get a new one 40 years from now or have it repaired 4 times. it is not a scam on leupolds part it is the way they can afford to fix from 0-40 year old scopes
 
OK tell me how leupold can back up a 40 year old scope and stay in business without charging for all the warranty when the scopes are sold. it is not a scam it is a way to do business

ok tell me how they can stay in business if you send a scope back to them that was $100 40 years ago and fix it at todays rate or send you a new one? only way is to charge enough on new scopes to cover repairs. I paid $89 for the CP but did not pay enough to get a new one 40 years from now or have it repaired 4 times. it is not a scam on leupolds part it is the way they can afford to fix from 0-40 year old scopes
You didn't answer the question though is there any top companies worth paying for or are they all over priced, no better than economy counter parts?
 
....

Have you ever used a fenwick? So in you estimation is any "top" company in the sporting good world worth paying for?
I talked to many reps and they told me that. the top stuff is worth paying for if you use the warranty a few times you know like closing a car door on the pole or stepping on it while in the boat :evil: My friend went peacock bass fishing in the Amazon and I almost forced him to take an ugly stick I had along with his gear. those fish are savage fighters and he along with the others broke their poles and he was able to use the ugly stick to catch 7 big bass. lent it to the other guys with the guides giving the rest ugly sticks. all of them had $200-$300 poles. then you have to ask yourself if the product was so good would you need that warranty. if you feel that is the way to go then that is your choice
 
when leupold offers their repair or replace warrenty on their scopes it also lets the customer know they are planning on being around in the future and will take care of their products (if you dropped one of your rifles on a hunt, leupold would take care of the scope).i,m glad to see more scope makers offer good warrenties, if in fact they will in the future with out making you jump thru hoops to use the warrenty without a receit or being the original owner and not a short warrenty(only certain things covered or offering a new scope at a reduced rate). this is not going any where, you like what you like and i like what i like, so i,m done on this matter. eastbank.
 
I've used 3 or 4 of the 4-16 CP's on several 22's and they have all worked fine. Eye relief is critical at 16X but they return to zero just fine, no reticle movement with magnification change, and even the newer model with the lower profile target turrets does have a zeroable feature with the 3 tiny screws on the side of the turret body via small eyeglass screwdriver. Measured ~ 90 MOA turret travel, BTW.

Always liked the 7 mil reticle system they put in these optics too. Nice to have a little more without going overboard.
 
i have a older cp on a savage mark 2. it works great nothing wrong with them on a lighter caliber rifle. not everybody has a fortune for scopes. however when i put my banners side by side with my elites there is a big difference. those elites sit on the better rifles and i would agree on a big hunt you are better equipped.
 
I talked to many reps and they told me that. the top stuff is worth paying for if you use the warranty a few times you know like closing a car door on the pole or stepping on it while in the boat :evil: My friend went peacock bass fishing in the Amazon and I almost forced him to take an ugly stick I had along with his gear. those fish are savage fighters and he along with the others broke their poles and he was able to use the ugly stick to catch 7 big bass. lent it to the other guys with the guides giving the rest ugly sticks. all of them had $200-$300 poles. then you have to ask yourself if the product was so good would you need that warranty. if you feel that is the way to go then that is your choice
So there no quality difference between a CP and a Leupold or any "high end" scope in your opinion? So wheres that leave the Leupold line up? Are the vx-1's, 160ish and up, equal to the vx-6's, 800ish and up?
 
So there no quality difference between a CP and a Leupold or any "high end" scope in your opinion? So wheres that leave the Leupold line up? Are the vx-1's, 160ish and up, equal to the vx-6's, 800ish and up?
of course leupold is better then CP. but do you think it is right they sell a $5500 scope to the military? how much do you think it costs to make a good scope?
 
of course leupold is better then CP. but do you think it is right they sell a $5500 scope to the military? how much do you think it costs to make a good scope?
I have no idea what goes into military scopes so I can not comment. I am sure some one here does though. The military doesn't have to buy them and I am sure there is a lot of competition for those contracts. Do you know for fact they aren't worth 5 grand? I can tell you from my personal experience the VX-1's are awesome, 3-9x40 going for 160ish dollars is a deal. Vx-1s are my best scopes but would like a vx-3i either 1.75-6 or 2.5-8 (numbers might be a bit off) maybe next year.
 
i have a older cp on a savage mark 2. it works great nothing wrong with them on a lighter caliber rifle. not everybody has a fortune for scopes. however when i put my banners side by side with my elites there is a big difference. those elites sit on the better rifles and i would agree on a big hunt you are better equipped.
I agree with this also nothing wrong with a centerpoint either. maybe not made in the U.S. but crossman employ's plenty of people here in the U.S.
 
I agree with this also nothing wrong with a centerpoint either. maybe not made in the U.S. but crossman employ's plenty of people here in the U.S.
I am pretty sure UTG made the adventure series 4x16 the OP mentioned. they have discontinued it and now crosman makes a version
 
I bought the 4-16 4 years ago maybe longer and it was crossman then. I don't think UTG made them unless your saying they were made by UTG for crossman.
 
I have no idea what goes into military scopes so I can not comment. I am sure some one here does though. The military doesn't have to buy them and I am sure there is a lot of competition for those contracts. Do you know for fact they aren't worth 5 grand? I can tell you from my personal experience the VX-1's are awesome, 3-9x40 going for 160ish dollars is a deal. Vx-1s are my best scopes but would like a vx-3i either 1.75-6 or 2.5-8 (numbers might be a bit off) maybe next year.
More than a handful of military contracts are categorized as "sole source" contracts which allow for the normal competitive bids to be tossed based on compelling needs, etc. Though they can be beneficial, these types of contracts can end up being a bit expensive.
 
I have a couple of Leupold scopes and plan on buying a couple more. Great scopes at a good price with a real company holding up a real warranty.

But the potential cost of future warranty work is paid for up front by every customer. It only needs to raise the cost of the scope 5-10% because most people won't ever send in their scope for warranty.

I've never used a center point scope but with inexpensive scopes it's a crap shoot. Some brands, models, or individual examples work very well for the price while others don't. With manufacturing costs dropping they continually get better through.

I have a utg scope that is better than a walther scope but another utg scope that is junk. I have a bushnell elite that is fantastic and a xlt that is mediocre and never tracks well.

However, brands like leupold make consistently great products.
 
Last edited:
I bought the 4-16 4 years ago maybe longer and it was crossman then. I don't think UTG made them unless your saying they were made by UTG for crossman.
no I meant the CP adventure series scope that is no longer made was made by UTG for CP. so it seems crosman has put out their own version which is different and I guess UTG is out of it now
 
More than a handful of military contracts are categorized as "sole source" contracts which allow for the normal competitive bids to be tossed based on compelling needs, etc. Though they can be beneficial, these types of contracts can end up being a bit expensive.
Well when you have a captive audience.....
 
Well when you have a captive audience.....
after some time of doing some reading on Leupold military scopes, Mark 4's and other higher end scopes and knowing they have scopes that can be had for under 200 dollars that carry the same lifetime warranty your stance on Leupold being some how unethical doesn't really hold water for me. Obviously your milage will vary. A vx-1 made in oregon going for 160-180 on line, that carries a lifetime warranty, backed by a company that has been around a while with a reputation for customer service seems real fair to me. Just my opinion of course. And I will still maintain nothing wrong with being a fan/user of Centerpoint, Crossman employs plenty of Americans also.
 
after some time of doing some reading on Leupold military scopes, Mark 4's and other higher end scopes and knowing they have scopes that can be had for under 200 dollars that carry the same lifetime warranty your stance on Leupold being some how unethical doesn't really hold water for me. Obviously your milage will vary. A vx-1 made in oregon going for 160-180 on line, that carries a lifetime warranty, backed by a company that has been around a while with a reputation for customer service seems real fair to me. Just my opinion of course. And I will still maintain nothing wrong with being a fan/user of Centerpoint, Crossman employs plenty of Americans also.
you are welcome to your opinion but mine is they are ripping the taxpayers severely
 
you are welcome to your opinion but mine is they are ripping the taxpayers severely
can you site an article with price and scope model. I'm wondering which scope you think is over priced? I looked into other scopes and Leupold seem to be inline price wise with all the competitors when you try to compare features and what not.
 
can you site an article with price and scope model. I'm wondering which scope you think is over priced? I looked into other scopes and Leupold seem to be inline price wise with all the competitors when you try to compare features and what not.
in a quick search I found one at optics planet a Leupold MK 8 - 3.5 x 25 x 56 x 35mm M5B2 for $4700 and I am not sure if that is the one I was referring to for the military which is more
 
in a quick search I found one at optics planet a Leupold MK 8 - 3.5 x 25 x 56 x 35mm M5B2 for $4700 and I am not sure if that is the one I was referring to for the military which is more

So why is that not worth $4700? Mark 8 is alot of scope. Have you compared the leupold Mark 8 with schimdt & bender, swarvski or night force? There are other manufactures selling 3000+ dollar scopes. Way outta my league but I am not going to say they are not worth the asking price.
 
So why is that not worth $4700? Mark 8 is alot of scope. Have you compared the leupold Mark 8 with schimdt & bender, swarvski or night force? There are other manufactures selling 3000+ dollar scopes. Way outta my league but I am not going to say they are not worth the asking price.
there is nobody going to tell me it costs maybe $3000 for them to make that scope or anyone else for that matter. I mean really how much can it cost to make a good scope? I had $150 bushnells hold zero for 30 years. if some have to much money and are trying to get rid of it they can have at all the 5K scopes they want
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top