nvrquit
Member
Is this a Case...
... of Malum Inse or Malum Prohibitum?
Is the law in question possibly making the church a law breaker, valid? Why is the church, a religious entity, being decidedly investigated by a governmental agency when the government deems it unpalatable to allow almost any type of Christian entry into any public operation they control?
While I am not overtly religious and do not wish any others religion stuffed down my throat, I find governmental intrusion into church matters completely unacceptable. The fact that no governmental agency will, in most cases, ever be held responsible for individual or particular group protection, I also find it very offensive that the same governmental agencies would strip me or others of the ability to protect myself or loved ones(which may include fellow parishioners). If the chuch has opened the operation to outside entry(non-parishioner children allowed entry to the program), then I might see the government's case as valid. Otherwise, stay out of the church's business in attempting to protect the parishioners' children during their stay on church property.
Perhaps a closer review of the original intent of the nations founders should be performed, on several of the original Articles.
... of Malum Inse or Malum Prohibitum?
Is the law in question possibly making the church a law breaker, valid? Why is the church, a religious entity, being decidedly investigated by a governmental agency when the government deems it unpalatable to allow almost any type of Christian entry into any public operation they control?
While I am not overtly religious and do not wish any others religion stuffed down my throat, I find governmental intrusion into church matters completely unacceptable. The fact that no governmental agency will, in most cases, ever be held responsible for individual or particular group protection, I also find it very offensive that the same governmental agencies would strip me or others of the ability to protect myself or loved ones(which may include fellow parishioners). If the chuch has opened the operation to outside entry(non-parishioner children allowed entry to the program), then I might see the government's case as valid. Otherwise, stay out of the church's business in attempting to protect the parishioners' children during their stay on church property.
Perhaps a closer review of the original intent of the nations founders should be performed, on several of the original Articles.