exsactly what they had moved to get away from!
The problem is that wherever you want to move - in general a whole lot of other people want to move there to.
In North Carolina, I have shot at several county ranges that were built right next to dumps. That's not an accident.
All over the country (at least where there are jobs), what was "boonies" a couple of years ago is now 'burbs.
I don't see that trend reversing in my lifetime. Maybe if gas get so expensive that commuting is out of the question. Then maybe we'd move back to the centralized city structure, with lots of boonies for hunting. But I don't see that happening.
I also don't see any right or wrong to it. People get to vote, and people vote for their (perceived) safety. If everyone I knew who hunted was as safe as with guns as the people I grew up around, I would be fine hearing rifle/pistol shots.
But there are a lot of hunters who are not very careful. As an example, I was raised with a pretty absolute rule that guns and alcohol do not mix. I also have good friends who went deer hunting with uncles where deer hunting meant "walking around the woods drinking hoping to find some deer so stupid it couldn't avoid 10 fat drunk men" - as he described it. My dad had a good friend shot (but not killed) just walking around the woods. There were hunters in those days that tool "sound shots" - shoot at a sound, and then go see if it was deer. When I was a kid, the local Izaak Walton club warned members not to carry (then popular) white waxed paper lunch bags. Evidently some folks got shot because hunters or "hunters" saw the white lunch bags flapping and figured it was white tail.
So while there are a lot of safe hunters out there, there also seem to be a lot of unsafe hunters out there. And safe weapons handling skills seem to me to be independent of where you were raised.
In general, I think hunted in populated areas seem like a back idea.
Mike