Colt Commander

Status
Not open for further replies.
+1 on Scandium Commander as ultimate carry gun

and on Commanders in general. I like how they balance out in my hand; also by some trick of eye/hand index I shoot them better than a 5", and that is purely subjective.
Ed Brown beavertail, Novak sights, Esmeralda grips.
Cheers, TF
 
I got my LW Commander earlier this month.

A little story:

Several years back, I was with my wife at a gun show and I came across a stainless LW commander which looked similar to what Spinnerblade posted.

Now, my wife never nags, but she was downright urging me to buy it! (But, being me, I didn't listen...)
 
Ghost Tracker
But I AM considering selling a gun (or two) in order to finance what I consider to be an ideal carry gun. The Commander-length, scandium-framed 1911 S&W ...

ME TOO!!! She moves me :eek:

SW1911PD-1.jpg
 
Last edited:
1975 Combat Commander with King Hardball sights instead of no seeum nickle ones. I carried an identical gun as a fed agent (my own "back up")
practicalstuff041.gif

My favorite serious fighting pistol has Novak Nite sites, custom tuned action and those Esmeralda grips!
practicalstuff039.gif

My current CCW gun is this Smith rendition; scandium frame keeps the weight down!
P1010497.gif
 
I had a Colt Combat Commander back in the 1970s - I've been thinking
about getting one, again. I would like one with an alloy
frame for carry - I have a full size SW1911.

Couple of QUestions for yah Commander guys.

Q1 - Is the '70s Combat Commander with the satin nickel
finish rare or prized price wise?

Q2 - What about an extended ported barrel in the
Commander?
 
I have an opinion on the Colt Commander, LOVE IT! Mine is a Combat steel frame. I'll shake it up more, it's in 9mm and the extra weight doesn't bother me. Makes a great CCW. Currently it's wearing a flat Ed Brown mainspring housing not showed in this pic.

AaronPictures1107.gif
 
I'd stay away from the SC (satin chrome 70 series) Combat Commanders as the finish was not that durable and they are a bear to strip before you refinish. Yes they are a desireable premium collectors gun and go for about $900+ in 90%+ these days. A blue one is a hundred or two less and a worn but not modified (butchered) one can be gotten for $600 or so and makes a great gun to freshen.
I have a theory that the Commander 4.25 barrel with it's extended ejector makes for a more reliable gun (if everything else is in spec and good condition) than even the beloved 5", I know they cycle a little quicker and seem to get the brass away from the gun better IMHO.
 
I have a theory that the Commander 4.25 barrel with it's extended ejector makes for a more reliable gun (if everything else is in spec and good condition) than even the beloved 5", I know they cycle a little quicker and seem to get the brass away from the gun better IMHO.

I haven't found that to be the case...at least not consistently.

While the Commander in its original configuration is about as short as we can go and still get reliability that closely approaches the 5-inch gun without extra tunin' and tweakin'... it can still present some problems occasionally.

The main problem comes from people trying to overspring it. Coupled with the shortened runup, a faster moving slide can induce some funky magazine timing problems...especially when it's being driven 10% faster with a recoil spring that's heavier than it needs to be. I'll go ahead and say it out loud. 18 pounds is too much spring for a Commander or a 5-inch gun. 16 is a gracious plenty, and Colt has never...to the best of my knowledge...used an 18 pound recoil spring in any Commander.

If frame to slide battering is a concern, there are much better ways to control that...and I don't mean with a shock buffer. Those don't fare very well in most Commanders anyway, and further reduce the already too-short slide travel. They also absorb and eliminate the steel to steel rebound effect that helps accelerae the slide on its return to battery.

The reduced mass of the slide can also present its share of chinks by reducing the amount of momentum available to strip the next round and fully chamber it.

The extended ejector was a necessity with the shortened slide travel...not an enhancement. While it does hustle the brass out of the port, it comes at a price. Going on the dictum that you rarely gain anything without losing something else...this is a perfect example of that.

With the standard slide travel and ejector, the slide uncovers the magazine completely before the case hits the ejector nose. The rising round bumps the empty case, and helps get it on its way toward the port. It also supports it...except on the last round out...and keeps it from dropping low on the breechface should the extractor tension be a little weak. This is an aid to consistent ejection, both as to distance and exit angle.

I'll admit that the greatest majority of Colt Commanders and Combat Commanders don't give many real problems, and are are pretty easy to whip into submission when they do. Much easier than the Officer's Model class, and a casual walk in the park when compared to the Micros and the pseudo-Commander clones that use oddball recoil systems and such...but they can be problematical at times. Regardless of their near-sterling reputation...If things have to be "right" in a 5-inch pistol, they have to be "righter" whenever the slide loses mass and gains speed. The Commanders fit that category. I love'em...but they can be a little persnickety on occasion.
 
I finally got another Colt Combat Commander. NIB never shot got it cheap too!
 

Attachments

  • commander 2.jpg
    commander 2.jpg
    45.4 KB · Views: 18
Wow...some nice looking Commanders here! I'm looking at a Commander myself and I'm not sure if it's the steel or alloy frame. I plan on shooting it a LOT and wonder if the alloy frame would hold up so I'm curious to know if it would be a feasible plan to buy a steel 1911 frame to use so I don't wear the original frame out?
 
Well Tuner I agree on everything you said! However, on a well set up (I like the 16 pound spring too!) Combat Commander I have, and will continue to bet my life.The alloy frame feed ramps can be a real issue, especially with certain hollowpoints!
 
I have several Commanders. 6 Colts and a LB C7. I guess you could say I have a gaggle of them.:rolleyes:
All steel, no LW. They are my favorite carry guns, my favorite range guns, my favorite guns PERIOD!

The balance, the feeling in my hand when they clear the holster, the presentation to target - Man, ain't nothing like it!

I believe EVERYONE should have at least ONE Commander!:D
 
I foolishly sold my Colt Combat Commander (a model 80 with a few finish blems and ghetto grips). It was the latest of many but won't be the last unless I die soon. It's a matter of balance for me; the gun sits perfectly in my hands. I can shoot the Guv'mint Model a tad better, but as others have commented, it's nose heavy for me. I have no experience at all with the Commander light weight, but did have a shorty Kimber Ultra Carry. I didn't like the muzzle blast and flip. I never put a lot of rounds through it because of those factors and while it was reliable in the short term, I worried about that shortened barrel, recoil spring guide, etc. The friend to whom I sold it wasn't happy with it either and let it go.

As with every gun I've ever sold, except maybe the .32 Mauser 1934 (I think that was the model), a Llama .22 semi, and some long guns, I regretted the loss of that latest pony.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top