FIrst I want to apologize for the glare. Couldn't get the natural light I needed.
The CW9 is brand new and will replace my RAMI as an everyday carry gun. The RAMI hasn't met the standards for a trim, and tall guy such as myself, and the controlls are difficult at best.
First thing I noticed that I can not represent for you guys is the EXTREME difference in weight. Obviously the RAMI is very heavy with its steel frame.
While the CW9 has a longer barrel (3.5 as opposed to 3) you will notice the over all length of the RAMI exceeds the CW9.....
[/IMG]
Obviously the single stack CW9 is much slimmer than the double stack RAMI....
[/IMG]
The CW9 comes with a factory single stack, 7 round magazine (9mm). While the RAMI comes with one doublestack 10 round magazine (9mm).....
[/IMG]
The nose comparison reveals the CW9 is consistantly slimmer than the RAMI on all fronts....
[/IMG]
The Frame on the CW9 is 100% plastic, while this model RAMI is Steel with rubber grips. Despite the simple grip, I find the CW9 gives a stonger and more secure hold on the gun....
[/IMG]
The RAMI with its 10 shot mag double stack mag leaves no room for my pinky finger despite my slender hands....
[/IMG]
The CW9 has a very slim grip, but I am still able to hold it tight, my pinky does not hang off the bottom of this grip...
[/IMG]
I enjoy the egronomics of both these pistols but prefer the CW9. The asthetics of both hands guns is pleasing. I find the DAO long and smooth kahr trigger safer and faster than the DA /Cocked and locked RAMI (RAMI has saftey but no decocker). I find the RAMIs controls difficult to manipulate, which worries me about preformance during a state of duress.....
[/IMG]
Both are great handguns, but the RAMI doesn't comapare in the features that I'm looking for.... I hope you enjoy the write-up guys!
7
The CW9 is brand new and will replace my RAMI as an everyday carry gun. The RAMI hasn't met the standards for a trim, and tall guy such as myself, and the controlls are difficult at best.
First thing I noticed that I can not represent for you guys is the EXTREME difference in weight. Obviously the RAMI is very heavy with its steel frame.
While the CW9 has a longer barrel (3.5 as opposed to 3) you will notice the over all length of the RAMI exceeds the CW9.....
Obviously the single stack CW9 is much slimmer than the double stack RAMI....
The CW9 comes with a factory single stack, 7 round magazine (9mm). While the RAMI comes with one doublestack 10 round magazine (9mm).....
The nose comparison reveals the CW9 is consistantly slimmer than the RAMI on all fronts....
The Frame on the CW9 is 100% plastic, while this model RAMI is Steel with rubber grips. Despite the simple grip, I find the CW9 gives a stonger and more secure hold on the gun....
The RAMI with its 10 shot mag double stack mag leaves no room for my pinky finger despite my slender hands....
The CW9 has a very slim grip, but I am still able to hold it tight, my pinky does not hang off the bottom of this grip...
I enjoy the egronomics of both these pistols but prefer the CW9. The asthetics of both hands guns is pleasing. I find the DAO long and smooth kahr trigger safer and faster than the DA /Cocked and locked RAMI (RAMI has saftey but no decocker). I find the RAMIs controls difficult to manipulate, which worries me about preformance during a state of duress.....
Both are great handguns, but the RAMI doesn't comapare in the features that I'm looking for.... I hope you enjoy the write-up guys!
7