Fletchette
Member
Flechette the difference between a teenager having sex before their emotionally equiped to deal with the conseqences,and a adult who prays upon unsuspecting children to sexually grattify themselves is a TOTALLY different ballgame and im sorry to see you dont differentiate the two.
Ajax,
Don't be sorry, I DO differentiate between the two; it is the law that does not. This is the point that I am trying to make (and a point that many of you seem incapable of acknowledging) - many of the people on these lists are not really a danger to society - they merely did something (like urinating off a balcony or dated an underage girl) that got them labelled as "sex offenders". I simply do not believe it is ok to murder these people because they are on the list.
Flyboy said:
However, I still don't think that means we need lists; rather, it means we need longer prison terms, up to and including life without parole.
If he's still a danger, he shouldn't be out of prison! If it's not in prison, he's served his time, and should be free to enjoy the rights of any other free man.
Bingo! I agree exactly! If they are truly a threat to society (forced rape of a six year old) lock him up for good. I'd even support an execution for such a crime (by a jury, not a lunatic). Public urinators and cheerleader mooners should not me murdered and should not be on any "list".
A Cleaner said:
My final comment, without rhetoric is this: The list is a good thing. It informs everyone around these criminals to be on guard. This information is no less relevant to neighbors of a rapist or pedophile than a criminal history report is to a potential employer.
Let me post a question. Should we execute all criminals convicted of second-degree murder? Should all second-degree murder convicts be given life without parole? Think about it.