Cutting Recoil Springs

Status
Not open for further replies.

mister2

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
261
Location
AZ
Cutting springs has always been discouraged by most people in the know, but I came into a 1911 that already had one in it, so here are my questions.

The recoil spring wire diameter is noticeably heavier than the stock 16# spring, but it is also shorter. In effect, the spring seems lighter when the cycle begins, peaks at full recoil and then returns to rest. FWIW, it also had a FLGR. It has run flawlessly, other than an infrequent premature slidelock. And yes, it did not have it, but I did put in a buffer. There is no doubt this Norinco has seen many, many rounds downrange. It continues to run very well. Subjectively, it seems to recoil less than other 1911s I’ve shot, but I chalk that up to the heavier weight of the FLGR and the buffer. But maybe not.

Does the heavier, but shorter, spring move the pressure curve towards full recoil, thus saving the frame from battering (relatively) and easing up faster (because it’s shorter) as the slide goes into battery , thus again saving the frame (relatively)?
Does it affect felt recoil since the slide impact against the frame is decreased by the higher spring pressure at that moment?
Is this (heavier, shorter) an old armorer trick from the past that’s gotten dusty with the easy access to a wide assortment of springs in various weights and buffers?

Thanks in advance.
 
Clippin' Springs

Howdy Mister2,

Trimming the length of recoil springs used to be about the only way we had to fine-tune'em when the slides outran the magazines. That, and sliding the spring over a suitably-sized rod, and letting it roll against a belt sander to reduce the wire diameter.(UGH!) With the widespread availability of Wolff magazine springs, those times have thankfully come to an end. I still occasionally run into identical NIB Colts with recoil springs of different free lengths and numbers of turns...so it's a good liklihood that somebody is fine-tuning springs somewhere along the line.

Basic rule of thumb for this practice is that if you have to remove more than two full coils, it's time to step down to the next lower rate and start over.
Best to just invest in a three-pack of Wolff mag springs and be done with it though. Those things are money well-spent, and are a lot like that rabbit that keeps on goin' and goin' and goin'...

Another rule of thumb when dealing with coil springs is that 32 coils of smaller wire is better than 28 coils of heavier wire. The springs drive their component
for a given length, and the longer you can keep driving it, the better...even if
it means reducing the total load at full compression.

Also...reducing the slide velocity and frame impact with a heavy spring is often counterproductive, because the magazine timing becomes more critical as the slide's speed on the return to battery goes up. There's another very good way to accomplish that, and that's with a firing pin stop with altered geometry on the bottom. It accomplishes that by utilizing more of the mainspring's loading to delay the slide, thus dissipating some of the slide's momentum at the very beginning of its travel.

Hope this helps.
 
Hello, Tuner. What you said all fits the apparent history of this Norinco. Its slide's been hardchromed, and hotrodded a bit. I'll post a pic of a clever way the previous armorer adapted a beavertail. But it's worked well with a variety of magazines, so I'm not touching anything on it for now. Well, I DID add a buffer <ducking>.

I should add that when I first took it apart, the original FLGR had a flange that had been beaten down to half the original thickness.

We're (1911 owners) fortunate we have Wolff and the other manufacturers to provide aftermarket support, kinda like the Chevy small block. Ever try modding a Buick nail-valve Special?

Good to hear from you again.

Thanks
 
Funny you should mention that,
I've got a pair of 401/421/425 heads on the seat and guide machine now,and a 215 for an F85 in the floor to build as a matter of fact.......................
Glad they only want stock rebuild work on them though!
 
The 401 heads (or whatever they are) are for another shop.
Because of the odd shape and depth of the chambers,they can't get the spindle on their 30K Serdi machine down into the chambers to cut for seat inserts or face the seats!
So all I'm doing is that part.
As for angle milling,they probably already are,knowing how those production shops "slam bam thank you ma'am" do stuff.

Now the little 215 could use all the help it can get!
I may trick it up a little bit.Anybody know where I can get some bling for it?

I have a spare one of those myself,that I want to put into one of my TR 4's when I finally have time,assuming it isn't a pile of rust by then,ha ha.
 
Last Buick I saw at the strip was a Wildcat 425 in a M38 Jeep. Scary fast, but kept snapping the prop shafts because of the driveline angle. Anyways, good luck with your all-aluminum B-O-P 215. Turbo, right? Seems appropriate in a TR-4, after all, engine and marque eventually owned by British Leyland.

How'd springs get to this? Oh right, you were shimming those nail valve springs....
 
As promised , here are pics of beavertail adaptation for Norinco. Perhaps no other hammers or beavertails were available, so whoever worked on this notched the BT.

View1.gif

The hammer's bobbed so it fits the indentation perfectly at full cock

View2.gif

Bottom view

View3.gif


MR2
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top