CZ vs S&W

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have a HK USP45c and really like that gun, although it's definitely not the most accurate in my hands compared to some others I own. The USP, as well as the m&p were designed around the 40 s&w cartidge which is a good thing. The USP is an absolute tank of a handgun and few can offer a tougher gun than that. Personally for me the CZ's are the easiest to shoot accurately handgun design, particularly in 9mm. The P09 has picked up steam and has quickly became a really good gun with high capacity and great shoot ability. But again that's in 9mm for the most part. All of the problems I've heard of in the Cz line of gun have been around the 40s&w cartidge, from parts breakages to reliability. The p09 isn't quite as popular in 40 so I haven't really heard of to many problems with it particularly. I'm seeing p09's for sale in 40s&w for under $400 frequently and I think for the gun your getting its an absolute steal. I'm not interested in owning anymore 40's or I probably would have bought one. I have no experience with the px4 but people who own them seem to love them. The m&p is hard to beat with the warranty and aftermarket, but I sold mine because of the stock trigger and palm swells on the backstraps didn't agree with me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top