Gunnerboy
Member
Ive used a Sig226 and was looking at the cz the price of a cz is far more appealing but ive never heard of a Sig going wrong so how does the CZ75
stand up to the Sig 226 ?
stand up to the Sig 226 ?
Sig is the better gun hands down.
I have both and much prefer the CZ75 because I hate DA/SA operation. The P226 was one of my first handguns, before I leaned DA/SA doesn't work well for me.
The CZ 75 is a DA/SA gun. Unless you have the SA version.
From my understanding a guy named Ron Cohen screwed up Kimbers QC, and he is now doing the same at SIG as he is there CEO. That's what I've been told anyway. [/url]
I'm going to assume that both are comfortable in your hand. Under that premise why would you pay twice as much for the Sig?
The Sig is no more accurate than the CZ.
The Sig is no more reliable than the CZ.
The Sig's design is not any better that the CZ's.
The Sig does not have any more replacement parts available than the CZ.
The Sig is no easier to maintain or clean than the CZ.
With the extra 2000 rounds that you'll get with the CZ , you will enjoy the handgun more & you'll be a heck of a lot more proficient with it.
Pay twice as much - NO WAY!! At my LGS you can get a new SIG P226 for about $225 more than a new CZ 75. CPO P226s with warranty are LESS.
Oh you forgot --
SIG has better fit and finish than CZ.
SIG has better trigger than CZ.
SIG has better warranty than CZ.
Now that may not matter to some but to some it will and they are willing to pay for it.
Again each has to decide for himself or herself what will work best for them for their investment.