R12GS LMAO!!! Yeah, tell that to other half of the country that would see John Kerry elected to president. Sorry pal, but if you believe that somehow magically everyone in this country see's things the way you and the vast majority of posters here do, you have a long long LONG way to go in criminal law. Being a student doesn't make you an expert on what takes place on the the stand, take it from me, I'm usually on the stand at least once a week.
Being on the stand once a week doesn't make you an expert on arguing a case. There are several druggies, misfits, and miscreants that are in and out of both police stations and courtrooms on a weekly basis, that doesn't mean I'd take their advice on how to argue my case to a jury. Your experience notwithstanding, I don't believe that the majority of people in this nation are zombies that believe absolutley everything tossed at them by Hollywood or some desperado District Attorney for that case, trying to prove that punisher grips (with no other corroborating evidence) make this guy a cold blooded killer. I'm not saying that it isn't possible that somehow, if the stars lined up correctly, it it was his unlucky day, then perhaps, a
VERY good and clever DA totally disregarded the merits of a guys self defense case and wanted to prosecute the guy who shot and killed the crack fiend who entered his home in the dead of night. (very unlikely, but still possible) This lawyer would have to make the case that this guy who shot and killed in self defense was a "punisher" type of person. On top of that, he would have to get the judge to issue the instructions to the jury that he should be found guilty if the prosecutor has proven, beyond a reasonable doubt, that this guy with his punisher grips killed in cold blood. Are you serious??? This weak case is gonna get you convicted??? Like I said, I'm no lawyer yet, but I do study case law under some very competent attorneys and this would definitly meet their definition of a "silly case". If this was brought to trial, any semi-competent attorney would have a field day ripping the DA's case to bits because of some silly grips that were on the gun and no other evidence corroborating it. There has to be something else to back up the DA's assertion that this guy is a cold blooded killer. (journals, witness statements suggesting the same, tape recordings of him confessing to be a vigilante)
The justice system requires for the prosecution to meet the burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Any case that would hinge primarily on grips with no other corroborating evidence would be a loser.
That being said, yes, there is a possibilty of Mr. Punisher grips being railroaded by the system and ending up in jail for shooting somebody. That's a chance ANY and ALL of us take the moment we decide to excercize our second amendment rights and purchase a firearm for self defense. With or without punisher grips, there is a risk of prosecution for using our weapon in self defense. We must however take into consideration: A. the unlikliness of any of us non-LEO's having to use a gun in a life and death situation, B. Most self defense situations come to an end the moment a potential victim presents their gun, so there wasn't even a shot fired, and C. most people believe in the fundamental right to self defense (they would serve as jury).
I think it's definetly a little on the paronoid side to worry about some grips about a comic book character that might land you in jail.
I'm just saying, that the chances are so remote that these grips could bring with them some calamity that it's silly to even make an issue out of it. Now if this guy was wearing a whole punisher outfit, stalked the parks looking for bad guys, AND had these grips, then he might be in some trouble.