Mute
Member
Four against one. A 15 round magazine isn't going to make much difference.
A statement that demonstrates poor mindset. What choice do you have but to fight when attacked by six men already at close range? Not fight? If you are going to fight, are you not going to fight to win? No doubt, six against one is an extremely bad situation. But one thing is certain, you will not win if you expect to lose.Hate to break it to you guys, but if you are attacked by six men, already at close range, then it doesn't matter if you have 8 or 15 or 30, because you aren't going to be alive long enough to use them all anyway.
Not necessarily. A plan based on the other guy running away is a bad plan. If it were true, all anyone would need is a starter's pistol. A friend of mine coined the term "the vaginal enemy" to describe this assumption.Bad guys are like crows. Scavengers, not soldiers. They don't want a battle.
Clear disparity of force. 6 guys coming at you with the intent to harm you are more dangerous than one guy with a knife. Deadly force could easily be justified given the correct circumstances.i know this isn't legal/political, but if you had to use your firearm, how well would it go over if you took out six bad guys in the name of 'self-defense?'
i know this isn't legal/political, but if you had to use your firearm, how well would it go over if you took out six bad guys in the name of 'self-defense?'
I dunno, but when I carried a S&W I felt just fine with 5 rounds of .38 special (no reload).Do you feel comforatable with only 8 rounds of .45ACP?
Some things to think about: Who do you shoot first? How many times? Do you shoot until the first guy is down, or do you shoot roadhouse rules?