tyeo098
Member
Hopefully the 'war' will end with the pen, not with the sword.
But keep your sword ready.
But keep your sword ready.
The boy is a brat? What do you know about him except that he's SEVEN?
Agreed, but doesn't mean he's a brat. Just needs more supervision until he's more mature at his age than perhaps you or I.Yes, I wouldn't have advocated charging the kid with a felony...but there's a good example of a boy who wasn't ready for the responsibility.
More true than you know. Even a felony charge without a conviction makes military service difficult in at least two branches.Hard to say which is more asinine; laying a felony arrest on a 7 year old or ascribing a firearms violation to the activity involving a BB gun?
Doubtless, this kid will have this coming up for the rest of his life (lack of conviction aside) - probably already on a no-fly-list and doesn't know it yet.
Given the standards kids and boys in particular are held to today I can only thank God that my childhood isn't formally documented anywhere. My enthusiastic engagement in all things, mis-behavin' would have me saddled with a heck of a collar not to mention totally disallowed me for my past military career which ironically was augmented by my mis-spent youth on a very practical level.
I don't think we, as a society, want to go there. Just look at Syria today and see what awaits.
It also teaches people to consider the court summons as frivolous and should be ignored. Abusing the power of the summons just to scare people when they don't intend to prosecute earns contempt and disrespect for the system. The prosecutor is undermining his own authority with such actions.I wonder if maybe this wasn't someone trying to teach the child the gravity of gun ownership. The charges were dropped after all. If it was a lesson (similar to scared straight), I bet it worked. And I bet the parents won't be leaving him unattended with a gun for a very long time. Now had they actually tried to prosecute, I would be enraged.
The only way to get a charge for a summons to court is either the police referred (recommended) the charges to the DA, or the DA on his own took the case file and used the info provided to file the charge without a referral (not recommended). Over looking the words "BB" and "seven years old". There is no giant machine that automatically turns 911 calls into court cases. The DA made a conscious choice to charge a seven year old with a BB gun as a felony.I know I said this four posts ago but I am going to say it again. I would be surprised if the entire thing was NOT an accident. My guess is someone read 'shot car with gun' instead of 'shot car with BB gun.' As soon as the mistake could be corrected it was. Nobody in North Carolina is trying to charge the kid intentionally.
I think we will give NJ back to the Brits or sell it to Germany/China before we let the rest of the Country become like NJ. Not going to happen. Your current shame is not our future.BB Guns have been "firearms" in NJ for 40 years. Get used to it. It's only a matter of time.
Interesting choice of words, that. It's been a lot of years, and I've spent some time on the receiving end of "parental justice", but never had it explained to me like that, though....took responsibility, paid for the damage and administered parental justice.
This is where I part ways with the parents. This one is on mom, plain and simple....the backyard of their rural home shooting his BB gun. His mother stepped inside to put dinner in the oven – telling the boy not to run off.
And we are surprised by this...why, exactly?But Sam’s curiosity got the best of him — and he scampered out of the backyard...
Kid may have had poor luck, or poor aim, but there is another possibility, and it has to do with giving a kid a hammer, and wondering why he treats everything like a nail....and fired his BB gun at an abandoned house across the street. In doing so, he hit a car."
Not all airguns are created equal, depending on state. In mine, my Crosman M1 was not a firearm, my Sheridan 5mm pneumatic was.an airgun is SPECIFICALLY NOT a firearm....
No, not the country. A few states have been infected, but we will soon defeat the disease or cut out the cancer one way or the other. If you think the rest of the country is going to ban BB guns and hollow point bullets like NJ then you're the one with your head in the sand. The rest of us have been embarrassed by NJ for a long time.Have you been watching the news? My "shame" is becoming the country's reality. One state at a time. Sure Texas may be last, and who knows what will happen next, but if you think ridiculous laws and rulings like this are confined to places like NJ, then you've got your head in the sand.
Yea thanks for the explanation Joeshmoe. But I am aware of how the system works. His charges were also dropped before he even stepped foot into a courtroom.The only way to get a charge for a summons to court is either the police referred (recommended) the charges to the DA, or the DA on his own took the case file and used the info provided to file the charge without a referral (not recommended). Over looking the words "BB" and "seven years old". There is no giant machine that automatically turns 911 calls into court cases. The DA made a conscious choice to charge a seven year old with a BB gun as a felony.
Either through ignorance or stupidity. Same thing here.
Have you been watching the news? My "shame" is becoming the country's reality.
(That kid as well as mine will see the war that puts an end to all this nonsense._
(Well said. I hope as a young man I will be around to contribute when that time comes.)
(I don't think we, as a society, want to go there. Just look at Syria today and see what awaits.)