Rockwell1
Come on Ted either the 2a is your permit or it's not
TexasRifleman
Here's the clip of him explaining this. I'm with you, it is a bit hypocritical to get himself "special" treatment.
I think you guys might be missing the point here. I don't think he is claiming that he does not need anything other than the 2A to legally carry concealed today. Otherwise, why the extra certification. I think he means the 2nd Amendment originally gave us all we needed, and is all we should ever need, but as you know, political power grabbers intruded.
It is the answer to the notion that permits are a reasonable restriction. When either of you guys are debated about the reasonableness of carry permits, you correctly reply along the lines of "
nope, the 2A is my permit". Obviously, what you are really saying is that the 2A acknowledges your right to carry, not the permit. The law of the land is to the contrary, but originally, the 2A was all we needed. I know both of you guys hold this belief as do I. That is why I like that quote of his. It is really how I read the 2A, although I'll of course abide by the law and I have a permit.
Also, I'm not sure what you meant by the subsequent clip, explaining the first statement. It doesn't. Maybe you meant something else. IIRC and FWIH, he became a sworn LE agent back in the '70s so that he could carry in every state while on tour. One of the things he hated so much was touring through a state where he had to do so unarmed, so he jumped through the hoops he had to, to carry uninhibited in the manner the 2A originally protected.
I make a point of not responding to comments made about my sig line because it is always off the given thread topic, but hey, I had to do it sooner or later. It often attracts heat and I'm not unprepared to face it.