stellarpod
Member
After buying a .204 Ruger barrel for my Pro Hunter I fretted for months over what scope to mount. Now, I'm an admitted scope snob, usually leaning towards Zeiss, Leupold Vari-X III, high-end Nikon's and even the occassional Swarovski. But, for this rifle I decided to try a low-priced scope in the Millett Buck Gold 6-25 x 56 Side Focus "Varmit Target Special" variety, as I ran across a pretty sweet deal on it.
I mounted this scope using a T/C Maxima No. 7429 steel scope base and Millett Angle-Loc weaver-style rings.
My problem arises in that the eye-relief (theoretically 3.3 inches average) is such that I cannot get the scope far enough forward to suit me. I'm a fairly big guy at 6'4". To my way of thinking I've only got two options if I want to use this scope on this gun: 1) buy a different weaver rail that cantilevers further forward on the barrel thereby allowing me to re-position the rings/scope, or 2) lengthen the pull of the stock with some kind of extension or recoil pad.
When I compare the position of the scope mounting holes to the trigger position it seems that the mount is substantially further rearward than on other rifles.
Questions:
1) Do any of you find the position of the mounting holes to be equally frustrating?
2) Have any of you found the length of pull to be somewhat short on this rifle? And if so, what did you do to relieve this condition?
Thanks for you replies.
stellarpod
I mounted this scope using a T/C Maxima No. 7429 steel scope base and Millett Angle-Loc weaver-style rings.
My problem arises in that the eye-relief (theoretically 3.3 inches average) is such that I cannot get the scope far enough forward to suit me. I'm a fairly big guy at 6'4". To my way of thinking I've only got two options if I want to use this scope on this gun: 1) buy a different weaver rail that cantilevers further forward on the barrel thereby allowing me to re-position the rings/scope, or 2) lengthen the pull of the stock with some kind of extension or recoil pad.
When I compare the position of the scope mounting holes to the trigger position it seems that the mount is substantially further rearward than on other rifles.
Questions:
1) Do any of you find the position of the mounting holes to be equally frustrating?
2) Have any of you found the length of pull to be somewhat short on this rifle? And if so, what did you do to relieve this condition?
Thanks for you replies.
stellarpod