Example of Corporate Responsibility

Status
Not open for further replies.

BSA1

member
Joined
Apr 20, 2011
Messages
7,492
Location
West of the Big Muddy, East of the Rockies and Nor
WARNING; THIS IS NOT A BASH TAURUS THREAD. IF IT TURNS INTO ONE I WILL ASK THE MODS TO SHUT IT DOWN.

This is also a long post which I hope the Mods will not object to.

What this is an excellent example of Corporate responsibility to admit to making a defective product and treating the customer fairly and quickly.

As many know TAURUS firearms have a reputation of poor quality control. My recent experience with a new Taurus M941 22 Magnum revolver is the case in point;

I purchased the gun new on April 3, 2013.

Due to the bad weather it was not until April 21st that we shot the gun for the first time. The gun had two serious flaws straight out of the box which were;

1. It was impossible to eject the empty brass after a cylinder full of 22 Magnum ammunition was fired. The extractor remained firmly frozen in place and it was necessary to remove each fired cartridge individually with fingernails. Curiously the extractor functioned smoothly and easily when empty and with unfired cartridges.

2. With SPEER GOLD DOT 22 MAG 40 GR. GDHP-SB ammunition the bullets were unstable and tumble as evidenced by the numerous keyholes from 7 and 10 yards and would not group it’s rounds with 4” spread of bullet holes fired from 7 yards and worse at 10 yards.

We fired a total of 50 rounds. The gun was oiled with REM-OIL.

Now for the responses I received from TAURUS Customer Service.

+1. I called the number listed on the warranty card. After being on hold for 30 minutes I talked to a representative. After the usual questions about what the problem is, if I tried different ammo (which I had not because of the shortage) and if I had cleaned the gun the rep. emailed pre-paid shipping label. She stayed on the telephone until I received her email with the shipping label and made sure I could open and print the label.

+2. I shipped the gun on April 23rd at no cost to me and received an email confirmation from Taurus on April 29th stating they had received my gun and repair would take about 6 weeks.

When I shipped the gun back I included the paper target showing the bullet holes, the empty plastic factory SPEER ammo box and 16 fired cases.

At the same time when I shipped the gun I sent a letter to Mark Kresser, CEO, Taurus International describing my complaint in detail and included a photocopy of the target.

+3. On April 29 I received a telephone from a Taurus Assistant who works for Mr. Kresser. As I was at work I could not answer my telephone and so she left a voice mail.

+4. The following day she called me again stated she had received my letter the day before. She said my gun will go on the workbench this week and she will be following up with the gunsmith as to the cause of the guns problem. She said she would call me back in 7 days.

+5. The next following day (May 1st) I received a telephone call from the same Representative stating that they were going to replace my gun. We made arrangements about how to have the gun shipped to the dealer that sold me the gun.

+6. On May 3rd I received a telephone call from Taurus Representative advising me they had received a faxed copy of my dealers FFL and they would be sending them my replacement gun in a few days. When I asked if the gun will be tested fired before they send it to me she replied “absolutely.”

Later that same day I received another call from Taurus providing me with the Fed-Ex tracking number for the gun.

+7. My replacement gun was received by my FFL dealer Monday morning May 6th. Enclosed was a 8 round test target shot at 10 yards with a 1 3/8” group. I noticed a couple of improvements right off the bat with the new gun; the muzzle had been crowned and the cylinder lockup was tighter when the gun was cocked.

There are several steps I took which I think helped in resolving my complaint so quickly;

1. I followed their procedure by calling first and getting authorization to return the gun for repair. It saved me money when they send me a pre-paid shipping label.

2. I provided evidence of my complaint by sending the test target which clearly showed the keyholed bullets holes and the large pattern the gun sprayed the target, the factory empty plastic ammo box and 16 fired cartridges with the gun. I put everything in the same box as the gun so they would not get accidently separated. The ammunition box had the factory codes on it so Taurus could check with SPEER if they suspected it was a ammo problem and the fired cases could be measured to see if the chambers were out of spec.

3. I also at the same time sent Mark Kresser a polite letter complaining about my disappointment with the gun. I did not use any vulgar language or make statements like I was never going to buy another Taurus product. In fact I praised the concept of the gun describing how my wife enjoys the lack of recoil and comfort when shooting it. I told him that I think the gun and caliber is a winner for concealed carry for women (which I do). I did include a copy of the letter I sent with the gun describing the problems with the gun and a copy of the target showing the bullet holes.

4. In this age of information superhighways it is very easy to research the name of a companies CEO and Executives. It probably took me all of minute to google it. Cut and pasting cut down how long it took to write a letter.

5. I can not find any fault with how Taurus handled my complaint. They quickly investigated my complaint and kept me well informed as what each step was going to be taken and the results of each step.

But all of this is for naught if in the end the gun doesn’t function properly and shoot tight groups. The jury is still partially out on this as it has been impossible to purchase any 22 Magnum ammunition designed for short barrel revolvers since I got the new gun and I am carefully hoarding my one and only box of Speer Gold Dot ammo. However the enclosed test target that came with the gun shows it shot well at the factory.
 
Last edited:
All that and you still haven't fired the gun?

You realize it may be no better than before, right?
 
Last edited:
All that and you still haven't fired the gun?

As the opening post pointed out, he hasn't fired the revolver because he wants to be sure it will be accurate with the ammunition he intends to carry, and for all practical purposes where he is that ammunition is not available - and that might be true of all .22 WRM ammunition in his area.

You realize it may be no better than before, right?

Unlikely, but possible. If that is the case he can take the matter up with Taurus again.

We live in unusual times.
 
I think Taurus has come leaps and bounds trying to change their perception by the public. Their warranty policy is pretty amazing in a world of disposable products. Any company can turn out a lemon, but it is how they take care of the customer when there is a problem that makes the difference.
 
A gun untested is a paperweight.

I understand ammo supply concerns, but that doesn't trump checking gun function, if only for one full cylinder.
 
Please read the title of the topic

David E,

The topic is not about how well the gun will shoot but how a major gun manufacturer handled a customer complaint about a defective firearm.

As my post was a long one I will reprint the portion that addresses your comment that "You realize it may be no better than before, right?";

"+7. My replacement gun was received by my FFL dealer Monday morning May 6th. Enclosed was a 8 round test target shot at 10 yards with a 1 3/8” group. I noticed a couple of improvements right off the bat with the new gun; the muzzle had been crowned and the cylinder lockup was tighter when the gun was cocked."

I understand ammo supply concerns, but that doesn't trump checking gun function, if only for one full cylinder.

"The jury is still partially out on this as it has been impossible to purchase any 22 Magnum ammunition designed for short barrel revolvers since I got the new gun and I am carefully hoarding my one and only box of Speer Gold Dot ammo."

As I have shot 100 rounds through the gun since I received the new one I know it will fire. BUT the ammo I have used is designed for rifles, not for use in short barrel revolvers. My experiences so far with that is a topic for another thread which I will post later.

Let's keep this thread on topic about how gun manufacturers, or any other corporation, responds to customer complaints.
 
Last edited:
BSA1, sorry to hear you had a lemon but I'm sure every manufacture has delt with qc issues before. Thanks for letting us know how Taurus dealt with your complaint. I thought you and they handled the situation very professionally. I also thought it was cool that they stood behind their product and replaced the gun!

P.s. my dad has two Tauruses, a PT92 and a 44 mag Silhouette, and they shoot and function great! Wish they still made the Silhouette!
 
Thanks for posting your experience. Sounds like Mr. Mark Kresser is trying to fix things, he's got my best wishes. :)

BTW, they could have shipped the handgun straight to you.
 
David E,

The topic is not about how well the gun will shoot but how a major gun manufacturer handled a customer complaint about a defective firearm.

If the new gun has problems, then how well was the complaint handled?

You left out that you fired 100 rds thru the new gun in your original post.

And none of us know if all the problems have been resolved until you fire some of your chosen defense ammo thru it.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for posting your experience. Sounds like Mr. Mark Kresser is trying to fix things, he's got my best wishes. :)

BTW, they could have shipped the handgun straight to you.
Why is that? (no ffl needed) I didn't even think about that, when Ruger replaced my SR9s extractor, they sent it straight to me...
 
Personally, I think a lot of Taurus's poor reputation is not all that deserved. While I don't personally own a Taurus, I have no reservation about buying one, as I have several friends who own one or more, and only one had any problem with his, and his problem was quickly resolved by the factory.

Thanks for explaining the proper way to handle the problem, some people tend to go off the handle, whether it be a gun problem or ammunition problem.
 
I think maybe since they replaced his gun (new serial number), they had to ship it to ffl.
 
Could they have destroyed the original gun, and put the same serial # on the replacement?

Would save lots of trouble in some states.

While I understand the OP is happy with the customer service, I don't think that lets Taurus off the hook for shipping the original gun in such poor shape to begin with.

For the price of guns, the consumer should not be the final inspection process, the factory should take responsibility for that. I find comments about how the guns have to "worked in" ridiculous. If they were machined properly at the factory with proper tolerances, that would not be necessary.
 
I wouldn't say Taurus quality is bad, just hit or miss. My wife and I have owned several Taurus firearms, all sold now. But never due to quality or defects, usually due to practicality. In my experience most gun makers will make it right, since one unsatisfied customer (especially in the firearms market) can easily turn into hundreds thanks to boards like this one.
 
Congratulations on such excellent customer service!

I'm waiting to hear how well it shoots now, though I understand your dilemma with the ammunition.

If you are near me on the East Coast (Virginia to South Carolina is my travel space), I can make arrangements to hand deliver a box of Winchester Super-X or CCI Maxi-Mag, either in 40 gr HP. I don't know how they would stack up against your preferred ammunition, but they'd probably be perfectly acceptable for function and accuracy check.

:)
 
My experiences with Taurus customer service are mixed.

#1. My PT-22 needed a new nylon buffer pad. I called and ordered a replacement with a credit card. (Not covered under the warranty) After a month, I called. I was told that they were out of the part and were awaiting a shipment from their supplier. I called every month, once a month, for four more months. On the fifth month I was told that the part had arrived, but they were too busy with an inventory to be bothered with shipping my part. After six months in the safe, my buffer finally arrived.

#2 Same gun broke a small part. I was reluctant to even call Taurus after my first experience. I was sure they were going to require me to ship the firearm back on my dime, only to wait months for it's return. I WAS WRONG. A very nice lady answered the phone, listened to my problem, then said the part would be in my mailbox within a week. Two days later I was installing the part.

Take what you want of this.

I know after my first experience I am reluctant to purchase any more of their products, despite the fact that that little PT-22 will eat any ammo I feed it and hit a plate at 25 yards.
 
Back in december, the trigger broke on my TCP... broke as in it snapped clean off. I finally got around to sending it in on my dime ($50). Repair service was fast and I had it back within 10 days. Here is where I will start to complain

I checked their status update site once and it just showed that repair was in progress. Next thing I knew, I came home to a gun sitting on my front porch. No email from taurus, no tracking number from fedex and they just left it on my porch!!!!!!!!!! First thing I noticed on the box was that the "special price" they gave me to ship it in may not have been so special. A tag from fedex was on the box listing the date it shipped, tracking number, same weight and a couple line items (shipping: 8.82, special: 7.60) with a total of $16.42!!! Of course when I asked taurus about this, they right away said no, we pay $50... bull.

Anyways, I took the gun to the range and put some light reloads through it. 45 rounds into the 4 boxes I was intending to shoot, the trigger went limp. The spring tension that pushed up the trigger bar was gone. I was getting ready to say screw it and pop the pins out to fix it myself, but upon tinkering around with it, out falls a random pin. Where did this come from? ooh, it was the pin that was holding the trigger in place. I put it back in and it just wants to fall out again. Trigger also has a very poor fit, lots of left to right travel.

back to miami again it goes... I loved this little gun and I want to one day be able to trust it enough to carry it again but thats gonna take a bit of time...
 
Personally, I think a lot of Taurus's poor reputation is not all that deserved. While I don't personally own a Taurus, I have no reservation about buying one, as I have several friends who own one or more, and only one had any problem with his, and his problem was quickly resolved by the factory.

Yeah, it is. But it's really good to see them trying to make things right. Let's hope it's a trend. Combine that with a trend for less defects in the first place (I know they'll never goto zero) and Taurus might be a good company.
 
I appreciate the story, but I still won't buy a Taurus. Just heard too many bad things. And when there are so many proven options out there why take the chance?
 
After 4 trips back to Taurus for bad timing, My old man's .22 Tracker seems to be finally working. It managed more rounds in 15 minutes than it had lifetime in the 2 years he's had it.

Glass half full, it's fixed... Half empty... the uncertainty of whether it was the change in work process at Taurus, or just the luck of the draw on the Service gunsmith who got it in order.

Buddy's .357 that is half sweat-rust on one side still running like a top as his "athletic" carry. Loose, but accurate and has never failed.
 
That's excellent customer service. I'm glad there are more companies like that out there.

Armscor / Rock Island Armory gave me similar service. I got a nickel 1911 Tactical that grouped horribly. I requested warranty service. The finish was also turning an odd black color, but that wasn't my main concern; I figured I just needed to clean it differently. They told me to box it up, and had UPS pick it up at my door.

When the gunsmith got to it, he took one look at it and called me to tell me they were just going to replace the whole gun. Apparently my sweat was causing a reaction with the copper under the nickel plating, causing it to turn black. Not everyone's sweat does this, but it happens from time to time. He gave me my choice of other finishes, and told me he was going to hand-select it and tune it up for me to make sure it shot well.

When I got the gun back, I was stunned, as the new pistol looked much nicer than my original. It's an excellent grey-black Parkerizing. It also shoots much better.

The finish issue wasn't even their fault, but they took care of me and the gun I wound up with is much better than my original in every way.
 
I think maybe since they replaced his gun (new serial number), they had to ship it to ffl.

No, they just have to update their files to reflect that the gun originally sold to (insert distributor/dealer) was replaced. When I had issues with my .17 HMR NAA mini keyholing, the completely new .22 WMR replacement was sent to my door.

As for the OP, that's an awful lot of legwork on your end that ensured good CS, rather than a standard for Taurus. Companies know by that kind of I-dotting and T-crossing that someone will be a pain in the keester if not handled well.

The fact that they sent you a flawed replacement also doesn't speak well to their "corporate responsibility"

I'll stick with companies like KT for my budget guns; They have sent me replacement parts at no cost with no questions, even when I volunteered the information that I LOST the part and had no problem paying.
 
I wouldn't say Taurus quality is bad, just hit or miss.
That sounds like the very definition of "bad" AFA Quality Control.
(Sorry, it's now Quality Assurance!) :rolleyes:

I have a relative that's a gunsmith at a local shop - visit him about 3 times a week just to catch up and chew the fat. Once, in 4 consecutive visits, I found him working on a NIB Taurus 3 out of 4 of those visits - guns had to be repaired before the shop owner could put them out for sale.

Within the last month I walked in the shop and heard the shop owner on the phone in a heated exchange with someone - he finally broke it off in 'em with the comment that hell, you folks have more of my inventory than I do!

I asked him who he was talking to?
I'll let you fill in the blank...

And I actually own a Taurus!

Don't ask... :D :banghead: :cuss:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top