Jason, don't sweat the comments if that's what you were referring to... they certainly aren't aimed to be personal. We all like to point out each others misconceptions whenever we can. However, some employ different methods than others as you have just witnessed.
G-d knows I've been corrected a few times (even though I'm actually omniscient)
We all have.
The only personal experience I've had with the PA-63 is from firing a friends who collects ex-Soviet block firearms.
The one I was shooting seemed to be more accurate than my IJ-70 (commercial Russian makarov with cheesy adjustable sights) until the sharp recoil spoiled that.
I feel the PA-63 would excel as a CCW pistol for someone on a budget. The crap we were feeding this particular pistol didn't affect the dependability a bit. It was also considerably lighter than my IJ-70, another virtue that lends itself to carry.
Accuracy and dependability aside, the recoil may be the only vice, as Clipse pointed out (common with any lightweight blowback pistol of .380acp or greater caliber).
Eventually, I'll buy either an inexpensive PA-63 or CZ-52 as a glovebox pistol for my Wagoneer (my camping/hunting and snowday vehicle), though that 7.62x25 just has a magnetism about it.