Styx
Member
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2014
- Messages
- 3,282
I understand that point. I'm not disagreeing that in your case it could be life threatening. I agree with you that a push or being punched or kicked just once can possibly result in death or serious injury. I can't say that I typically feel bad when a violent hot head who initiated an altercation got what he deserved whether it was a good shoot or not. We are on the same page there.As was clearly stated in my post, i ain't a healthy younger male. If I am attacked and get knocked to the crowd the same way I was in my story, I would be unable to stand up on my own let alone defend myself against a continuing attack.
My point is in most states (I'm not sure about TX law and case law), if there's no continuing attack that puts your life in danger, you can not legally shoot someone. I understand you and others might disagree, but personal opinions do not trump the law and how most L.E. , D.A.s, and the general public sees things. By all means shoot if you feel your life is in danger, but just be prepared to potentially be disarmed for the duration of a trail or for life, and being jailed unarmed with murders, rapist, drug addicts, etc. It's a choice and a risk you'll have to make for yourself.
I know that if you were pushed and was seriously injured by the fall, and then decided to shoot someone who was not active continuing to attack you, I'd have to wrestle with the the fact that whether I wanted to do the right thing legally by convicting you or letting you go because I might think the victim got what he deserved if I were a juror. I'd likely side via the letter of the law, and then would suggest the lightest sentence. I believe most other citizens wouldn't think twice about convicting you in this day and age.
Last edited: