In 2002 we went to Las Vegas, I won some money and in addition to being able to buy my girlfriend (now wife) some jewelry and some clothes and myself a Ruger Mark I .22 LR target pistol. The next day my girlfriend, my best friend and I went and rented two submachine guns at a local shooting range. An H&K MP5 and a "Schmeisser" MP-40 and we bought 1,000 rds for both of them.
The MP-40 was my favorite.
The bolt lurch wasn't near as bad as some people say. Non-issue. That's just something for people to talk about I guess. Liked the trigger and the sights. The rear sight was just a screwed in notch type set for a 100 meters and then there was this additional flip up for 200 meters. The front sight was hooded and was the inspiration for the MP-44, STG-45 and then the Cetme and G-3 I guess.
Didn't like the MP-5 near as much. I obviously wouldn't turn one down if someone gave me one for free, but I much prefer the H&K 91 and/or the H&K 93 for H&K long guns.
The MP-40 felt much handier and much more alive than the MP-5 right next to it.
So that gun was pretty fun.
Unfortunately I've never had $43,500 for a fully transferable MP-40.
The MP-40 was my favorite.
The bolt lurch wasn't near as bad as some people say. Non-issue. That's just something for people to talk about I guess. Liked the trigger and the sights. The rear sight was just a screwed in notch type set for a 100 meters and then there was this additional flip up for 200 meters. The front sight was hooded and was the inspiration for the MP-44, STG-45 and then the Cetme and G-3 I guess.
Didn't like the MP-5 near as much. I obviously wouldn't turn one down if someone gave me one for free, but I much prefer the H&K 91 and/or the H&K 93 for H&K long guns.
The MP-40 felt much handier and much more alive than the MP-5 right next to it.
So that gun was pretty fun.
Unfortunately I've never had $43,500 for a fully transferable MP-40.