SureLok
Member
Has anyone run into this? About 6-8 out of a 100 won’t seat all the way down. This is SPP. They shoot fine for the ones that seat correctly. I have used two different priming systems. It seems a bit excessive.
I ran into similar issue with other metric sized primers (Wolf, Tula, PMC, Fiocchi), particularly Fiocchi SP primers bought during the "Great Shortage" of 2013.Ginex primers seating high
Has anyone run into this? About 6-8 out of a 100 won’t seat all the way down. This is SPP
Yes RP brassSame brass?
I haven’t fired them, I’m not sure what to do with them. I’m using the brass cup. All RP brass. Using a T7 to seat. I have tried reseating but with about 25% success.Details?
Did the high primers fire on first strike? Second strike? Not even after how many strikes?
Ginex makes two variations that I’ve heard of…. bare brass cup and nickel plated cup. Which did you use?
What brass did you use?
What did you use to seat the primers?
When you say they won’t seat all the way down, did you try seating the high ones a second time with the same or a different tool?
FWIW, I use CCI pistol primers. Sometimes they don’t seat quite flush but they still all go bang. At first I fretted over it, but I decided since they all go bang except maybe 1 out of 500, mission accomplished. Caveat… I don’t shoot competitively nor carry reloads, so if a “click” does happen at the range, I just pull the trigger again. ymmv
Why would there be a metric primer?I ran into similar issue with other metric sized primers (Wolf, Tula, PMC, Fiocchi), particularly Fiocchi SP primers bought during the "Great Shortage" of 2013.
For most mixed range brass that's been reloaded several times with looser primer pockets, they seated fine slightly below flush (I aim for .004" below flush ... Check the US Army AMU on primer seating link) to pre-load the anvil tip against the priming compound. But with once-fired and particularly 9mm brass with tighter primer pockets (S&B, RWS, etc.), they were "no go" and I could not even seat them flush and they stuck up.
So I started to set aside S&B/RWS headstamp cases to be primed with smaller diameter "domestic" brand primers or Magtech SP primers (These have primed very well for me on par with Winchester SP ... Maybe Brazil being on "America" continent even though they are on metric system? ).
So check the headstamp of brass that Ginex primers won't seat flush/below flush and if they are same headstamp, you may need to do some sorting.
So what are these slightly larger metric primers good for? They are good for mixed range brass that's been reloaded/reloaded several times and extending the life of brass with looser primer pockets.
Most issues I read about seating the Genix SPP seem to be with the brass cup versions. I'm in my second thousand nickle cup Genix priming 9mm cases and haven't experience issues with high primers.I’m using the brass cup
Yes.Has anyone run into this?
Countries outside of US likely use machining tools calibrated to metric standards in cm/mm whereas US manufacturers use machine tools calibrated to thousandths of inch.Why would there be a metric primer?
Welcome to THR and the wonderful world of reloading/handloading.I'm new to handloading
Yes.Seat them harder.90/100 rounds I assembled were with Unis Ginex spp. Some priming attempts weren't successful (10/100)
Seating primers involve "feeling" two levels of resistance where first is primer cup being pushed down to the bottom of primer pocket and second is anvil being pushed up inside the cup to set tip against the priming compound which properly "pre-loads" the primer to set off reliably. As to seating primers properly, for me that's slightly below flush around .004" and explained in detail here - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...-and-discussions.778197/page-11#post-12417636I'm still learning the "feel."
This.Seat them harder.
Seating primers involve "feeling" two levels of resistance where first is primer cup being pushed down to the bottom of primer pocket and second is anvil being pushed up inside the cup to set tip against the priming compound which properly "pre-loads" the primer to set off reliably. As to seating primers properly, for me that's slightly below flush around .004" and explained in detail here - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...-and-discussions.778197/page-11#post-12417636
And do not worry about seating them hard/deep as I have tested domestic and foreign metric primers to .004" below flush down to .008" below flush where I started to flatten the primer cup and they all reliably ignited - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...-and-discussions.778197/page-10#post-11386382
I would not worry and try to seat primers slightly below flush. My QC check is to load finished rounds upside down on 50 round ammo trays factory rounds come in and run my finger tip over to identify any high primers, which could result in misfire.Due to that worry, my most recent batch of primed cases have all the primers sit flush with the case head.
Whenever I had questionable primer seating, I got out my ram prime and primed on my old single stage.
I have, but do it slowly. (Primer compound requires impact force with tip of anvil and cup applying pressure to detonate) Slow reseating of primer won't apply such "impact" force (Which BTW is the force we use to initially seat the primer, right? ).Does this mean you would prime a case, then attempt to reseat the primer?